The Federal System: RELATIVE SPHERES OF FEDERAL AND STATE POWER Flashcards
EXCLUSIVE FEDERAL POWERS
- Some powers are exclusively fed (ex. treaty power, coinage of money, & duty on imports, declaration of war, federal citizenship, naturalization, & borrowing money on US credit).
- Any state exercise of these powers would undermine the federal system.
- On exam, do not allow states to take actions that might touch upon foreign relations.
EXCLUSIVE STATE POWERS
- Federal gov has only those powers granted to it by Constit
- State govs have “unlimited” powers, all powers not prohibited to them by Constit.
- 10th Amend: all powers not delegated to fed gov by Constit are reserved to states (or to the people).
- However, given the expansive interpretation of fed powers (ex. commerce power), little state power is exclusive.
CONCURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE POWER—SUPREMACY CLAUSE
- Most governmental power is concurrent, belonging to both states & fed gov.
- Thus, it is possible for states & fed gov to pass legislation on same SM.
- When this occurs, Supremacy Clause: fed law is supreme, & state law is rendered void if it is preempted.
- State law may be preempted expressly/impliedly.
Express Preemption
- Fed law may expressly provide that states may not adopt laws concerning SM of fed legislation.
- Note: will be narrowly construed.
Implied Preemption
- Even if fed law does not expressly prohibit state action, state laws will be impliedly preempted if they actually conflict w/ fed reqs, prevent achievement of fed objectives, or Congress has preempted entire field.
Implied Preemption: Actual Conflict Between State and Federal Law Requirements
- A valid act of Congress/fed regulation preempts any state/local action that actually conflicts w/ fed rule
- Whether by commanding conduct inconsistent w/ that required by fed rule, or by forbidding conduct that federal rule is designed to foster.
Implied Preemption: State Prevents Achievement of Federal Objective
- State law will also be impliedly preempted if it interferes w/ achievement of a fed objective.
- This is true even if state/local law was enacted for some valid purpose & not merely to frustrate fed law.
Implied Preemption: Field Preemption
- State/local law may also be preempted if it appears Congress intended to “occupy” entire field, thus precluding any state/local regulation.
- Cts will look at fed regulatory scheme to deduce Congress’s intent.
- Ex. if fed laws are comprehensive/federal agency is created to oversee the field, there’s preemption
Presumption Against Preemption
- In all preemption cases, especially any involving a field w/in state’s power (ex. regulations for health, safety, or welfare), it will start w/ presumption that state police powers are not to be replaced unless that’s the clear & manifest purpose of Congress.
ABSENCE OF FEDERAL AND STATE POWERS
- Some powers are denied to both Congress & states
- Ex: Qualifications Clauses, setting qualifications to serve in Congress, are exclusive & cannot be altered by Congress/states.
- Ex: State-imposed term limit for members of Congress invalid
- Ex: State law instructing each member of its congressional delegation to support a constitutional amendment for term limits, & providing that failure to do so be noted on ballot, was invalid b/c it imposes a substantive qualification rather than regulates “manner” in which elections are held
INTERSTATE COMPACT CLAUSE
- States may enter into agreements/compacts w/ other states w/ consent of Congress.
- Not all agreements between states are “compacts” requiring congressional consent.
- Compact Clause reaches only interstate agreements that increase state’s political power at expense of fed supremacy (ex. agreement where one state cedes territory to another state).
- Congressional consent not required for multistate tax compact b/c compact does not give member states any powers they could not exercise in its absence
- SC has the power to interpret such compacts
- Member states do not have final authority over interpretation.
INTERSOVEREIGN LITIGATION: SUITS BY THE UNITED STATES AGAINST A STATE
- US may sue a state w/o its consent.
SUITS BY STATE AGAINST UNITED STATES—UNITED STATES MUST CONSENT
- Public policy forbids a state from suing US w/o its consent.
- Congress can pass legislation allowing US to be sued by a state in given situations.
FEDERAL OFFICER AS DEFENDANT
Limitation
- Suits against fed officer are brought against US itself if judgment would be satisfied out of public treasury/ would interfere w/ public admin - not permitted.
Specific Relief Against Individual Officer
- Specific relief against officer as an individual will be granted if officer acted ultra vires (beyond one’s legal authority):
(1) Beyond his statutory powers; or
(2) Valid power was exercised in an unconstitutional manner.
SUITS BY ONE STATE AGAINST ANOTHER
- One state may sue another state w/o latter’s consent.
- SC has exclusive original jurisdiction