FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

INTRODUCTION

A
  • Certain fundamental rights are protected under Constit.
  • If they are denied to everyone, it is a substantive due process problem.
  • If they are denied to some individuals but not to others, it is an equal protection problem.
  • The applicable standard in either case is strict scrutiny.
  • Thus, to be valid the governmental action must be necessary to protect a compelling interest.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Unenumerated Rights Generally

A
  • In addition to rights protected by first 8 Amends, the Constit also protects certain rights not specifically mentioned in its text.
  • Whether a right falls into the latter category depends on whether it is deeply rooted in nation’s history & tradition & essential to concept of ordered liberty.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

RIGHT OF PRIVACY

A
  • Various privacy rights, including marriage, procreation, contraception, & childrearing, are fundamental rights.
  • Thus, regulations affecting these rights are reviewed under strict scrutiny & will be upheld only if they are necessary to a compelling interest.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Marriage

A
  • Although not all cases examining marriage regulations clearly use compelling interest standard, law prohibiting a class of adults from marrying is likely to be invalidated unless gov can demonstrate the law is narrowly tailored to promote a compelling/ overriding or, at least, important interest.
  • Note: The Court has indicated that there is a “marital zone of privacy”, so it will likely grant broader protection to private sexual relations between married persons than it does concerning nonmarried persons.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Same-Sex Marriage

A
  • Fundamental liberties guaranteed by 14th Amend require every state to issue marriage licenses to 2 people of same sex & recognize same-sex marriages validly performed elsewhere.
  • However, Ct did not expressly hold that same-sex marriage is a fundamental right, nor did it address the standard of review (presumably, strict scrutiny).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Special Test in Prisoners’ Rights Cases

A
  • A statute/regulation that restricts constitutional rights of prison inmates will be upheld if statute/ regulation “is reasonably related to legit penological interests.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Procreation

A
  • Individuals have a fundamental right to reproduce that cannot be limited by the state.
  • Ex. invalidating a mandatory sterilization program as unconstitutional
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Use of Contraceptives

A
  • A state cannot prohibit distribution of nonmedical contraceptives to adults except through licensed pharmacists, nor prohibit sales of such contraceptives to persons under 16 who do not have approval of a licensed physician.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Abortion

A

-There is no longer a constitutional right to an abortion, matter is left to the states to legislate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Obscene Reading Material

A
  • Right of privacy includes freedom to read obscene material in your home, except for child pornography.
  • Does not include right to sell, purchase, receive, or transport obscene material
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rights of Parents

A
  • Parental rights are fundamental rights.
  • They include companionship, care, custody, & management of children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Education

A
  • Although state may prescribe reasonable educational standards, it may not require that all children be educated in public schools.
  • Neither may the state forbid education in a language other than English.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Visitation

A
  • A state law was found to be overbroad & in violation of parents’ rights where it
    (1) authorized cts to grant “any person” (including grandparents) a right to visit child upon finding that this would be in child’s best interests, and
    (2) did not allow judge to give significant weight to parent’s offer of meaningful visitation opportunity & the traditional presumption that a fit parent will act in child’s best interests.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Keeping Extended Family Together

A
  • Right of privacy includes right of family members—even extended ones—to live together.
  • Thus, a zoning ordinance cannot prohibit extended families from living in a single household since there is no compelling interest to justify such a rule.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Intimate Sexual Conduct

A
  • State has no legit interest in making it a crime for fully consenting adults to engage in private intimate sexual conduct that is not commercial in nature.
  • Rational basis test b/c of lack of a legit gov interest.
  • Ex. a state law making it a crime for members of the same sex to engage in sodomy violates DPC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Freedom from Collection and Distribution of Personal Data

A
  • Right of privacy does not prevent state from accumulating & computerizing names & addresses of patients for whom dangerous drugs are prescribed.
  • And state can republish the recording of an official act, such as an arrest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

RIGHT TO VOTE

A
  • 14th, 15th, 19th, 24th, & 26th Amends, all US citizens who are 18/older enjoy the right to vote.
  • It extends to all national & state gov elections, including primaries.
  • Right is fundamental; thus, restrictions on voting, other than on basis of age, residency, or citizenship, are invalid unless they can pass strict scrutiny
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Restrictions on Right to Vote: Residency Requirements

A
  • Relatively short residency requirements restricting right to vote (ex. 30 days) are valid b/c there is a compelling interest in ensuring that only bona fide residents vote.
  • However, longer residency requirements will probably be held invalid (ex. 1 year) b/c they discriminate against newer residents w/o a compelling reason, & thus violate EPC
  • Such residency requirements might also violate right to travel interstate.
  • Note also that Congress may override state residency requirements in presidential elections.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

.

A

.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Members of Armed Forces

A
  • Right to vote cannot automatically be denied to members of armed forces stationed at a particular locality.
  • They must be given an opportunity to prove their bona fide residency.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Compare—Nonresidents

A
  • Laws that prohibit nonresidents from voting are generally valid if they have a rational basis.
  • Ex. upholding denial of right to vote in city elections to persons outside of city limits, but w/in city’s police & licensing jurisdiction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Identification

A
  • State may require in-person voters to show a gov-issued voter ID.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Property Ownership

A
  • Conditioning right to vote, to be a candidate, or to hold office on property ownership is usually invalid under EPC, since property ownership is not necessary to any compelling governmental interest related to voting.
  • Ex. requirement of owning property/having children in schools to vote in school board elections struck
  • However, certain special purpose elections (ex. water storage district elections) can be based on property ownership.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Poll Taxes

A
  • Poll taxes are prohibited under 24th Amend, & also violate equal protection b/c wealth is not related to gov’s interest in having voters vote intelligently.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Primary Elections: State Regulation of Party Primaries

A
  • States may exercise some control over primary elections, but such regulation is subject to restrictions under 1st Amend (freedom of political association) & 14th Amend (EPC).
  • States can require a person to have been registered w/ a party for a reasonable time b/f that party’s primary election in order to be eligible to vote in the primary.
  • Ex. 11 months’ registration upheld & 23 months not upheld
  • However, if a political party wishes to open its primary elections to anyone, whether/not registered w/ the party, state cannot prohibit this b/c the state interest here is overridden by right of political association.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

States May Subsidize Primaries of Major Parties

A
  • States may subsidize primaries of major parties w/o similarly defraying costs of mechanisms through which minor parties qualify candidates for the general election
  • Ex. upholding law requiring new/small parties to proceed by petition/convention at their own expense rather than by publicly funded primary if new/small parties are given some effective way to qualify for general election
  • Ex. unduly burdensome petition requirements for new/small parties struck down as not justified].
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Dilution of Right to Vote: One Person, One Vote Principle

A
  • EPC of 14th Amend has been interpreted to prohibit state dilution of right to vote, & Art I has been interpreted to place same type of restriction on fed gov
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Establishing Voting Districts

A
  • Whenever gov body establishes voting districts for election of reps, number of persons in each district may not vary significantly.
  • One person, one vote principle.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Congressional Elections—Almost Exactly Equal

A
  • States establish districts for congressional elections. - However, requires almost exact mathematical equality between congressional districts w/in a state; thus, deviations of even a few % points between congressional districts w/in a state may result in invalidation of congressional district plan.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Compare—Apportionment Among the States

A
  • Congress apportions reps among states “according to their respective numbers.
  • Congress’s good faith choice of method in so apportioning reps commands far more deference than state districting decisions & is not subject to same precise mathematical standard as state plans.
31
Q

State and Local Elections—Variance Not Unjustifiably Large

A
  • Variance in number of people included in districts for purpose of electing reps to a state/local gov body must not be unjustifiably large, but districts need not be w/in a few % points of each other:
  • If a state can show variance between districts is reasonable & tailored to promote a legit state interest, the law establishing the districts may be upheld.
  • Ex. 16% variance in district populations was upheld in light of state’s interest in preserving political subdivisions, although 30% variance would be excessive
32
Q

.

A

.

33
Q

Exception—Some Variances Presumptively Valid

A
  • Ct has indicated that variances of 10%/ less are presumptively constitutional.
  • Therefore, state is not required to justify variances w/in that range
34
Q

Districts Can Be Measured Using Total Population

A
  • States need not measure equality of their districts by counting only persons eligible to vote.
  • It is sufficient to count total population.
  • The one person, one vote principle is best served by taking entire population into consideration
35
Q

Scope

A
  • The one person, one vote principle applies to almost every election where a person is being elected to perform normal gov functions.
  • Ex. trustees for junior college district
  • However, there are a few exceptions to note:
36
Q

Exception—Appointed Officials and Officials Elected “At Large”

A
  • Apportionment requirement is inapplicable to appointed officials not at-large systems of election
  • However, if an at-large voting system were established/maintained for purpose of suppressing voting power of minority race voters, it would be unconstitutional.
37
Q

Exception—Special Purpose Government Units (Water Storage Districts)

A
  • Gov can limit the class of persons who are allowed to vote in an election of persons to serve on a special purpose gov unit if gov unit has a special impact on class of enfranchised voters.
  • To date, only “water storage districts” to be so specialized that their governing boards are not subject to the one person, one vote principle.
  • Apportionment rules do not apply to water district even if district is major supplier of electricity in the state
38
Q

Standardless Recount

A
  • Counting uncounted ballots in a presidential election w/o standards to guide ballot examiners in determining intent of voter violates 14th Amend EPC
39
Q

.

A

.

40
Q

Gerrymandering
1)
Racial Gerrymandering

A
  • As indicated above, race (& presumably other suspect classifications) cannot be predominant factor in drawing boundaries of a voting district unless district plan can pass under strict scrutiny.
  • Moreover, a district’s bizarre shape can be used to show that race was predominant factor in drawing district’s boundaries
  • Bizarre shape is not necessary to such a finding.
  • Note that person challenging reapportionment has burden of proving race-based motive.
41
Q

Partisan Gerrymandering

A
  • Partisan gerrymandering (drawing district boundaries to favor one political party over another) presents a political question beyond reach of fed cts.
  • Accordingly, fed cts will not strike down partisan gerrymandering on constitutional grounds
42
Q

.

A

.

43
Q

Multi-Member Districts

A
  • State is generally free to have some multi-member districts together w/ some single-member districts, if number of members representing a district is proportional to its population.
  • However, single-member/multi-member districts will be held to violate EP (even though they meet the one person, one vote principle) if district lines were drawn on basis of unconstitutional criteria, like to suppress voting power of racial minorities/identifiable political group.
44
Q

States May Use Independent Commissions to Draw Districts

A
  • To avoid gerrymandering, states may use independent instruction to adopt congressional districts, rather than allowing state legislature to redistrict.
45
Q

Candidates and Campaigns
a.
Candidate Qualifications
1)
Fee Must Not Preclude Indigents as Candidates

A
  • States may not charge candidates a fee that makes it impossible for indigents to run for office
  • An unreasonably high filing fee (which was not tailored to promote a substantial/overriding state interest) might be held totally invalid so that no candidate would have to pay the fee.
  • A reasonable, valid fee would have to be waived for an indigent candidate who could not pay the fee.
46
Q

.

A

.

47
Q

Restrictions on Ability of Person to Be a Candidate

A
  • Restrictions on ability of persons to be candidates must be examined to see if they violate either 1st Amend right of political association/14th Amend EPC
  • Such regulations are judged on a sliding scale of scrutiny
48
Q

Note:

A
  • State may require candidates to show reasonable support (signatures/votes) to qualify to have their names placed on the ballot.
  • Ex. upholding requirement of receipt of at least 1% of votes cast in primary election
49
Q

Required Resignation of Office Is Permissible

A
  • State may require state officials to resign their office if they enter an election for another gov office
50
Q

Campaign Funding, Contributions, and Expenditures

A
  • Gov may allocate more public funds to the 2 “major” parties than to “minor” parties for political campaigns & may w/hold public funding from candidates who do not accept reciprocal limits on their total campaign expenses; but such expenses cannot otherwise be limited, unlike campaign contributions to political candidates, which may be limited if gov chooses
51
Q

.

A

.

52
Q

Extraordinary Majorities—Referendum Elections

A
  • Gov may require a supermajority vote for voter referendums, even though such a requirement might give a minority disproportionate power.
  • Ex, upholding 60% requirement for referendum approval
  • Ex, upholding requirement that new county charter be approved by separate majorities of city and noncity voters
53
Q

Replacement of Incumbent Legislators

A
  • State may validly give to a political party right to name an interim appointee to legislature to fill out unexpired term of a legislator from that political party who left office.
  • No voter is denied equal protection by this system.
54
Q

RIGHT TO TRAVEL
1.
Interstate Travel
a.

A
  • Individuals have a fundamental right to travel from state to state, which encompasses the right:
    (1) to leave & enter another state, and
    (2) to be treated equally if they become permanent residents of that state.
  • Ex. striking down California law that limited welfare benefits for new residents to what they would have received in their prior state of residence
55
Q

Standard of Review

A
  • When a state uses a durational residency requirement (a waiting period) for dispensing benefits, that requirement normally should be subject to the “strict scrutiny” test.
  • This means that the gov must show that waiting period requirement is tailored to promote compelling/ overriding interest.
  • However, in some right to travel cases, Ct has not been clear as to whether it is using this strict scrutiny, compelling interest standard of review.
  • The important point to note for the bar exam is that state residency requirements should not be upheld merely b/c they have some theoretical rational relationship to an arguably legit end of gov
56
Q

Examples

A
  • B/C of the ad hoc nature of these rulings, we will list 4 examples of Supreme Court decisions in this area:
    1) A 1-year waiting period b/f person may receive subsistence welfare payments is invalid.
  • Similarly, a law providing that persons residing in the state for less than a year may receive welfare benefits no greater than those paid in the state of prior residence is also invalid.
    2) A 1-year waiting period for state subsidized medical care is invalid.
    3) A 1-year waiting period to get a divorce is valid.
    4) A state may require a voter to register to vote in a party primary 10 months b/f primary election (to avoid interparty “raiding”).
  • However, a 23-month registration period would be invalid.
57
Q

Distinctions Between Old and New Residents

A
  • Some state laws that have an adverse impact on new residents do not involve a waiting period.
  • Ex. a state may attempt to dispense state benefits on basis of length of time a person has resided in the state.
  • A state law that distinguishes between residents of the state on sole basis of their length of residency will serve no legit state interest.
  • This type of law should be stricken under rational basis test b/c it has no rational relationship to any legit state interest
58
Q

International Travel

A
  • SC has not yet declared that the right to international travel is fundamental, although the right appears to be protected from arbitrary fed interference by DPC of 5th Amend.
  • Ct has held that this right is not violated when the fed gov refuses to pay Social Security benefits to persons who leave the country.
  • The test here is “mere rationality, not strict scrutiny
  • Congress may give executive branch power to revoke passport of person whose conduct in another country presents a danger to U.S. foreign policy.
  • The Treasury Department, w/ congressional authorization, could restrict travel to & from Cuba w/o violating 5th Amend
59
Q

RIGHT TO REFUSE MEDICAL TREATMENT

A
  • Right to refuse medical treatment is a part of an individual’s “liberty” that is protected by 5th & 14th Amend DPCs.
  • However, SC has not ruled that this aspect of liberty is a “fundamental right” & has not explained which standard of review should be used.
  • Nevertheless, Ct has ruled on validity of several types of legislation.
60
Q

Vaccination

A
  • Individual can be made to submit to vaccination against contagious diseases b/c of gov & societal interest in preventing spread of disease.
61
Q

Refusal of Medical Treatment

A
  • Mentally competent adult has right to refuse lifesaving medical treatment (including lifesaving nutrition).
62
Q

Compare—No Right to Assisted Suicide

A
  • No general right to commit suicide; thus, a state may ban persons from giving individuals assistance in committing suicide.
62
Q

.

A

.

63
Q

Compare—Criminal Defendants

A
  • Under DPC, gov may involuntarily administer antipsychotic drugs to a mentally ill D facing serious criminal charges in order to make him competent to stand trial if:
    (1) treatment is medically appropriate,
    (2) treatment is substantially unlikely to cause side effects that may undermine fairness of trial, and
    (3) considering less intrusive alternatives, treatment is NECESSARY to further IMPORTANT gov trial-related interests.
64
Q

RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS
.

A
  • 2nd & 14th Amends protect right of individuals to keep & bear arms
65
Q

Right to Self-Defense

A
  • A person has right to keep a handgun at home for self-defense & right to carry a handgun outside home for self-defense.
66
Q

Standard of Review

A
  • SC has held that it will not use strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, or rational basis review in the 2nd Amend context.
  • Rather, if plain text of 2nd Amend covers an individual’s conduct, then gov must justify regulation by demonstrating it is consistent w/ country’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.
  • The historical inquiry should pay particular attention to evidence from when 2nd Amend & 14th Amend were adopted (respectively, 1791 & 1868).
  • Simply positing that regulation promotes an important interest will not suffice.
67
Q

.

A

.

68
Q

Prohibited Regulations: In-Home Possession

A
  • A total ban on handgun possession in the home is unconstitutional.
  • Likewise, a trigger-lock requirement is unconstitutional
69
Q

Carrying a Handgun in Public

A
  • 2nd Amend protects right to bear commonly used arms in public.
  • This right can be subject to certain well-defined restrictions, but only if gov can show that regulation is supported by historical tradition
70
Q

“May Issue” and Special Need Regimes

A
  • A discretionary licensing regime (known as a “may-issue” regime) that gives broad discretion to licensing officials & requires applicants to show some special need beyond a general desire to protect oneself/one’s property to obtain a license to carry a firearm is unconstitutional
71
Q

.

A

.

72
Q

Acceptable Regulations: “Shall Issue” Regimes

A
  • Some regulations are permissible based on historical tradition.
  • Some “shall-issue” licensing regimes (regimes in which authorities must issue licenses whenever applicants satisfy certain threshold requirements) are constitutionally sound.
  • Permissible regulations may involve background checks, reviews of mental health records, & training requirements
    “Sensitive Places”
  • It is permissible to prohibit carrying of arms in certain “sensitive places,” such as legislative assemblies, courthouses, schools, & polling places, but arms may not be banned in urban areas broadly