Thatcher and the end of consensus, 1979-97 Flashcards
Why Thatcher won 1979 - conservative Campaign?
-Conservative campaign focused on earning votes of traditional labour voters, first time voters and voters in marginal constituencies.
-Populism was used in attempt to win over working class labour voters (E.g. Thatcher was photographed tasting tea and holding a calf.) Portrayed as a “Housewives friend”. to win over working class housewives, traditional Labour voters.
-“Labour isn’t working” campaign 1978 - picture of snaking queue to unemployment office - Labours negative impact on economy.
Why Labour lost 1979?
Election largely decided in London and Midlands, 40 seats changed hands from Labour to Conservative.
Winter of discontent, 78-79:
-Public services strikes demanding 40% pay rise. (leading to piling of rubbish in the streets etc.)
-Press unsympathetic/sensational to Labour/Unions presented labour as weak - used WOD as decline of country.
-Government caved to pay rise, perceived as weak and not in control of unions.
Economic Issues:
-Unemployment went from 542,000 in 74 to over 1.3 mil 2 years later.
-Stagnating with growth rates, low productivity, low investment.
-Wilson resigned - March 76 - lack of confidence in the pound - value fell.
- Solution - IMF loan 1976 - Healy asked International Monetary Fund for loan of 3600million dollars - to support pound.
-problem - meant GOV spending cut by 2 billion.
Outcome of 1979 election - Liberal vote?
Liberal Vote
-liberal kept hold of most strongholds.
-However, total vote dropped by over a million.
-Voters blamed them for keeping Callaghan’s government in office since 1977 (The Lib-Lab Pact - By election loses meant labours slim majority in HOC disappeared. Deal between Callaghan and Lib leader steel - 13 Lib MPS agreed to support gov.)
-Midland areas, collapse of Lib vote, hand seat to Conservative, even though labour vote did not significantly decline.
Most Important reasons was the economic circumstances and labour inability to deal with them.
Why Thatcher won 1983 - conservative strengths?
-Conservative majority of 144 – second largest majority in 20th century.
-Conservatives’ share of the vote fell by 1.5 per cent from 1979.
-Falklands war victory in Argentina, despite criticism of the war and how it was fought, received favourable press coverage – leading a national revival.
-Privatisation policies increased public shareholding and selling off council houses appealed to many middle-class and working-class skilled voters.
-Economic policies reduced inflation.
-Benefitted from the split in the Left-wing vote.
Why Labour lost 1983 - Labour weakness?
- Michael Foot’s Labour party fell by 9.3%, highlighting Labour weaknesses
-Labour vote dropped from 11.5 million to 8.5 million, giving Thatcher the stronghold, despite the conservative vote decreasing.
-Labour party had split in 1981.
-New Social democrat party allied with liberals won 7.7 million votes - splitting the anti-conservative vote, allowed conservative gains in traditional labour seats up North.
-Previous labour voters turned away - unpopular policies, Michael Foot as leader - Foot lacked assured manner on TV - his unilateral nuclear disarmament, nationalisation of industry and government regulation seemed old fashioned.
-Labour manifesto described as ‘longest suicide note in history’ - so out of touch with country.
Why Labour lost 1987?
Labour weakness:
-Kinnocks style: long winded in speeches compared to Thatcher - very strong leader - strong hold and colleagues and growing international reputation.
-However Labour gained 1.5 mil votes and 20 seats since ‘83.
-more affected by Alliance who contested every seat 1987 – splitting the left-wing vote.
Other reasons for the outcome of 1987 election?
-Conservatives won more votes than ‘79 or ‘83 despite losing twelves seats.
-Unemployment was falling, and the pound was strong.
-Conservative benefitted from left-wing vote.
-Labour actually gained 1.5 mil votes - so not as weak as 83.
Thatcher’s View on the Economy
- Four main issues:
o Inflation – prices had doubled since 1970’s.
o Lack of investment, modernization and economic stagnation.
o Costly + unprofitable publicly owned industries.
o Lack of incentive to modernize and increase productivity. - Believed state sector had been allowed to grow too much at expense of private business.
- Privatizations – enterprise encouraged through reduction of direct taxation.
- Deal with inflation – reduce amount of money in circulation.
- Did not believe regulation of wages or income would work – market would determine the wages and prices – unemployment preferable to increased inflation.
Thatcher’s Economic Policies?
- Privatisation began in October 1979 – sale of British Petroleum – continued throughout the 1980s.
- No longer support for failing industries – stopped production – leading to unemployment.
- Budgets 1980 and 1981 – reduce money in circulation – decreasing government spending – raising indirect taxation.
- Increase confidence abroad – pound value rose.
- Direct taxes + taxes on business – reduced – free money for investment.
- Interest rates remained high through 1980s.
- Financial services Act 1986 – deregulated dealing in stocks and shares and opened up share trading. ‘Big Bang’ -revitalised London’s money making market.
The Impact of Thatcher’s economic policies?
- Privatisation popular with those who bought shares in new companies. In 1979 there were 3 mil private shareholders - by 1990 - 11 million. gave many people a stake in success of economy.
- Prices rise fell: 1980 = 18%, 1983 = 4.5% - further fall in 1985-6.
- Stronger pound, changes in taxation, financial deregulation – growth in financial sector.
- Unemployment rose sharply – 1980s – initially 1.5 million – 3 million by 1983.
- Did not begin to fall substantially till 1986 – still over 2 mil 1990.
- Foreign investment increased – Japanese’s car firm Nissan – plant in North East.
- New industries emerged in 1980s – no big employers.
- Critics argues economic improvement was due to increase in North Sea oil production – tuning Britain into a net exporter of oil by 1980.
Was there an economic revolution under Thatcher?
Agree
o Shift from public to private sector.
o Privatised industries remained in private hands – after end of Thatcher.
o Encouragement of enterprises, small businesses + investment on stock market.
o More home ownership.
o Industries forced to become more competitive – fewer restricted practices + lower labour costs.
Was there an economic revolution under Thatcher?
o Thatcher’s policies were a selfish ‘get rich quick’ culture – disregard for rights and conditions of workers.
o Decline in manufacturing industry – Britain lost 15% manufacturing base.
o Greater divide between prosperous London, The Midlands and South-east and older mining + industrial areas.
o Gov spending as a percentage of GPD fell after 1984-95 – however not permanent figure in 2010-11 higher than 1979 – also cuts ot gov expenditure – not new – Labour CotE Healy – unpopular cuts in 1970s.
Was there an economic revolution under Thatcher?
Conclusion
o Economy did offer more consumer choice.
o Balance between states role in the economy and private sector did change.
o Movement in employment from trad industries to services was accelerated.
NHS reforms under Thatcher?
- Aimed to make NHS more efficient by applying business principles to its administration.
- Hospitals became self-governing trust, had to look after their own budget.
- Gps became fund-holders - hand to manage their own budgets.
- NHS services expected to compete to provide the most efficient and cost-effective service to GPs.
- Many believed in was much needed financial discipline for NHS.
- However, some people were highly critical of this, claiming first stage of privatisation, putting profit motive above patient care.
Education reforms under Thatcher?
Schools:
* Concern about education system:
* Quality of secondary education: two tier qualification - O levels +CSEs.
* thatcher’s solution: GCSE - replaces both in 1986, qualification for all levels of ability.
* 1988 - national curriculum introduced - regular testing.
* However, there were strong oppositions to these educational changes:
* Concern GCSE not academically rigorous enough.
* Content of curriculum (e.g. English and History) disputed.
Universities:
* Cut budgets - forced unis to seek alternative budget/accept more students.
* 1988 - Uni Funding Council - reflect the needs of economy, not just focusing on pure research.
* Removed polytechnics from local authority control - under control of University Funding Council.