test one Flashcards

1
Q

is science that is done in “service to the law literal latin root is “having to do with argumentation and debate”

A

Forensic science:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Major contributions of forensics to criminal Justice System:

A
Element of the crime 
support/disprove statements
Identify substances
Identify persons 
Provide investigative leads
Establish linkages or exclusions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the study of diseases – medical doctors that are experts in determining cause of death

A

Forensic pathology:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

study of insects

A

Forensic entomology:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

experts in skeletal remains

A

Forensic anthropology:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

study of poisons, toxins, and drugs in the body

Forensic psychiatry and psychology: evaluate the mind, “profilers”

A

Forensic toxicology:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

investigate automobile accidents, transportations, structural collapses

A

Forensic engineering:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

investigate use of computer technologies and electronic records

A

Forensic computer science:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

use of specialized equipment ex: specialized lights, ground penetrating sonar

A

Forensic/ investigation technologies:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

this encomposses all of hte speciality aras found in full- service forensic science laborites

A

Criminalistics:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Criminalistics 4 major categories

A

biological analysis,
materials analysis,
forensic chemistry,
pattern evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  • being able to tell what is potential evidence at a scene
A

Evidence recognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • this is identifying what is examined
A

Classification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

being able to exclude something as not being something

-

A

Disassociation -

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

recognizing something as unique, a way to classifying something as different they the rest of a group

A

Individualization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  • using evidence to determine how the event that caused the evidence, occurred.
A

Reconstruction

17
Q

2-D image as a result of contact with a hard surface

A

Imprints:

18
Q

example of an imprint

A

Example: handprint on cloth would not be

19
Q

: 3-D image produced by pressing into a soft surface

A

Indentation

20
Q

example of an indentation

A

a footprint in the soil

21
Q

Results of a hard surface being marking up by another object in motion
Usually done on metal or wood
These can sometimes be seen with the naked eye, and sometimes it requires a microscope

A

Striations:

22
Q

This when material ends up on a surface by traveling through the air (no direct contact)
Example: blood/ paint splatter, dust, pollen

A

Deposits:

23
Q

Classification of physical evidence:

A

Identification
Individualization
Reconstruction
Demonstrating exclusion can have as much value as inclusions

24
Q

Three databases exist for physical evidence

A

AFIS (Automated fingerprint identification system)
CODIS (Combined DNA Indexing system)
NIBIN (National integrated Ballistics Information network)

25
Q
  • that a “novel” scientific or technical piece of evidence could not only be admitted if the underlying scientific principles are generally accepted by the scientific community to which the test belongs
A

Frye

26
Q

Requires that scientific tests on evidence be “truly scientific”
They must have been subjected to significant hypothesis of the underlying principles
They judge is responsible for determining if the evidence is admissible using the criteria set out by the Frye case or the Daubert case, spending on jurisdiction

A

Daubert