Test #2 lecture notes Flashcards
social cognition
the investigation of how people think about others
Accuracy with regards to social cognition
it matters in terms of if one feels correct but not if they are actually correct
cognitive miser
humans tend to conserve our cognitive resources rather than use them
information overload
when there is more information to process than the cognitive resources you have present to do so. often times when this happens people shut down
information sacrificer
someone who uses criteria processes and shortcuts do be good enough, sacrificing information and accuracy
information maximizers
one who maximizes their use of cognitive resources, thinking through everything they can before they come to a decision and moving to the next goal
automatic vs. deliberate processes
6 points a,I,c,e,e,k
automatic does not require awareness, deliberate does.
automatic does not require intention, deliberate does
you can’t control automatic processes, you can control deliberate processes, thus,
deliberate requires more effort, is less efficient
automatic relies on knowledge structures
schemas
shortcuts for the mind, a large amount of information relating to a concept which affects how we process information
what happens when something breaks our schema
we get frustrated, and either try to adjust our schema or make an exception like penguins
stereotypes
person schemas
Kelly study on lecturers
gave students a short bio on a guest lecturer and it either triggered the stereotype for a warm friendly person or a cold distant person. Both groups of students saw the exact same lecture. Those who got the warmer bio rated the lecturer more positively, those who got the colder bio rated the lecturer more negatively.
scripts
schemas but specifically about events, how you expect an event to go. They can be for things like your morning routine, or how you set up a party, or welcome people into your home
priming
check notes
framing
how you present a question
gain framing
when you make a partisan think they are going to benefit by the way your are phrasing your question or comment
loss framing
when you highlight the potential for risk or the potential for loss when it comes to the words you choose
thought suppression
don’t think about white bears
heuristics
like schemas but more specific for decision making
representative heuristic
making decisions based on how typical it is to the average case
prototype
the average use used I the representative heuristic
barnum effect
creating examples that seem really relevant to the people you are talking about, while in reality they are really vague like fortune tellers - tricking people to think you have some internal knowledge by coming up with things that would be representative of most individuals
expectations regarding cause and effect
we expect the proportion of the effect to be the same size as the case. think earthquake and deaths
Availability heuristic
you make decisions based on how easy it is to bring examples to mind shark vs vending machine
simulation heuristic
the more easily you can create the event in your head, the more likely you are to believe it will happen - strictly regarding ease
anchoring heuristic
when we are asked to give a numerical answer, we like to anchor our answer based on information we already have. think of going second in answering how far the moon is from earth vs going first. judges and peoples assessments
attributions
explanations we make for why people do the things they do and why events may occur. essentially our explanations for why things are happening in the world
self serving bias
we take credit for our success and blame others for our failures
Weiner what are the two important pairs when it comes to attributions
internal vs external and stable vs unstable
internal vs external attributions
when what happened is because of the person or the environment. generally external for ourselves and internal for others
stable vs unstable attributions
when the explanation is unlikely to change ie. failing a marathon because the road was paved poorly, roads don;t get paved quickly vs saying I failed the marathon because it was too cold, weather is likely to change
Fundamental attribution error
overemphasizes internal attributions and underestimate external attributions, especially when talking about other people
actor/observer bias
often times we give ourselves a break because we think we know everything going on within ourselves, and have a good grasp on the external factors that are influencing behavior, so we pin things on those external factors. while when looking at others we don’t know how those external factors are affecting them we are more likely to make an internal attribution.
essentially because we know more things about our lives we are better at finding external scapegoats
Covariation model
actions vs intentions
we judge other based on their actions and judge ourselves based on intentions
conformity vs individuality
we assume other people are conforming while we come from a place of individuality
confirmation bias
we pay attention to information that agrees with us an we forget information that disagrees with us
optimistic bias
we think bad things won’t happen to us
overconfidence bias
we are a lot more confident in ourselves and or decisions than we should be
negative bias
when bad things happen to us, we focus on them extensively
optimistic bias vs negative bias
optimistic bias is future oriented negative bias is about the present or the past
illusory correlations
we make connections that we don’t have a reason or foundation to make, may use it to try and understand a chaotic world
one shot illusory correlation
when something so weird happens the through a single exposure you create a correlation
base rate fallacy
we ignore the base rate and do whatever we want. when we are trying tin Justin our behaviors we ignore or underuse base rate information, think lottery players
alternative outcomes effect aka gamblers fallacy
when someone keeps winning they thunk it will continue and when someone keeps losing they think they are due for change. believing that past history has an impact on future random chance
self fulfilling prophecy
when we believe that something will occur, we engage in behaviors that will make it more likely to occur
false consensus
we think more people will agree with you than may actually agree with you. fits will with information has or overconfidence effect. Think behind the curve flat earth’s doc
false uniqueness
we think we are more special than we actually are
perseverance
once we have a belief we are unlikely to change it, we find excuses that explain something we believe. think darley and gross
illusion of control bias
we think that we have more control in the universe than we actually do
counterfactual thinking
we image an alternative to an actual event. sometime upward or downward. usually we are not accurate , its not like if you left the house later you would’ve been in that car wreck
first instinct fallacy
we think that we should not change based on our first instinct.
this is considered a fallacy because we are doing a selective memory, we remember instances where if we had changed we would have ended up in a worse place, but not ll the times we did change and were right
bodenhausen
people are more likely to show their biases in their off times - morning people at night or night people in the morning
how not to fail
use deliberate rather than automatic processing; less likely to fall pray to these biases
meta cognition; thinking about your thinking to identify your biases
be more humble; if we are humble enough to recognize we can be wrong, it can set us up to avoid these biases
emotion
a conscious state that is in reaction to some external event or stimulus. a specific reaction
mood
a state that is not connected to o in reaction to any external stimulus. specific but not a reaction