Teams And Teamwork Flashcards

1
Q

What is a team?

A

A team is a unit of 2 or more people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, set of performance goals, and expectations, for which they hold themselves accountable

Lussier + achua 2001

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Groups vs teams

A

. Teams are often used interchangeably
. Team is a group that possesses extra, positive features
. “A group turns into a team once it has organised itself to fulfil a purpose” (Buchanan and huczynski,2010)
. All teams are groups, but not all groups are teams
. Teams share missions and collective responsibility , commitment in group may not be as strong
. Teams have mutual accountability groups emphasise individual accountability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sharing common value and cooperating

A

. When one of those changes people often no longer belong
. Teams can only succeed or fail collectively

*most teams have fewer than us members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sundstorm et al 1990

5 dimensions

A

Each team type is differentiated along 5 dimensions:

  1. Degree of differentiation from other units how similar or different this team is from others in the organisation
  2. Degree of coordination - how closely the team needs to work with other work units in the organisations
  3. Degree of technical specialisation- do members need to apply specialist technical skills, or they draw upon members experiences and problem solving abilities
  4. Work cycles - how much time does the team need to achieve its aims
  5. Typical outputs - what does the team actually produce
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Typology allows you to catergorise teams in order to aid improvement

Typology teams :

A

Advice teams
Action teams
Project teams
Production teams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Advice

A

A team created primarily to provide a flow of information to management to be used in its own decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Action teams

A

. Execute brief performance, that are repeated under new conditions
. Members are specialised in terms of knowledge/skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Project teams

A

. Bring together people from different areas to accomplish a specific task
. Limited time frame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Production teams

A

. Consists of individuals who share a production goal

. Perform day-to-day, core operation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Working in a Team

A

. An understanding of, and commitment to group goals on the part of all team members
. Getting the very best out people whilst recognising organising are co-operative systems
. Crucial during periods of change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Teamwork and organisations

A

. Team is crucial to organisational performance
. Teams must be balanced – this can be achieved by:
. Recruitment employees who help balance the team
. Job design and work organisation are reviewed
. Good, open, honest communications are maintained
. Team performance is regularly reviewed
. Interpersonal conflict is dealt with promptly
. Team development is carefully planned
. Team performance is adequately rewarded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Are teams always good ?

Allen and Hecht,2004

A

. The romance of teams
. Teams fulfil psychological, social and political needs
. Teams make people more satisfied, faster confidence
. Teams fit with attractive ideals of empowerment, participation and democracy
. Faith in effectiveness that isn’t supported by research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Naquin and tynan 2003

A

. Teams are innapropriate and ineffective in certain situations
. Teams continue to be used uncritically in organisations
. Balance between being a team member and standing out as an individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Advantages of a team

A
. Achieve synergy 
. Total output execs sum of input 
. Mutual support, better decisions 
. Continuous improvement + innovation
. Increase job satisfaction 
. Satisfy needs such as affiliation, security, self-esteem, self- fulfilment 
. Links to retention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Disadvantages of a team

A
. Pressure to conform 
. Social loafing 
. Group think
. Too cohesive 
. Cliques 
. Change in own goals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Team effectiveness

Lussier and achua 2001

. Defined as the achievement of 4 performance outcomes

A
  1. Innovation/adaptation: can rapidly respond to needs and changes
  2. Efficiency: team can attain goals with fewer resources
  3. Quality: achieve superior results and exceed expectations
  4. Employee satisfaction: teams ability to maintain commitment and enthusiasm by meeting the personal needs of its members
17
Q

Hackman 1990 - 3 hurdles each team must overcome to achieve effectiveness

A
  1. Expand sufficient effort to achieve the task (motivation)
  2. Bring sufficient knowledge and skill to the task (composition)
  3. Use processes that are appropriate for the task and setting (processes)
18
Q

Determinants of effectiveness team decisions

A
  1. Team size and composition
  2. Members status
  3. Team cohesiveness
  4. Traits and values of team members
  5. Quality and leadership
19
Q

Problem team members

A
Talker 
Wanderer 
Bored 
Arguer
Silent
20
Q

Organisations role in creating effective teams

A
. Top management 
Unconditional support 
. Info and resources 
. Flexible task structure 
. Appropriate size 
. Right mix of people 
. Defined mission and goals 
. Team leadership 
. Feedback 
. Identify and build on strengths 
. Develop ability to anticipate and deal with change
21
Q

Decision making in teams

Advantages and disadvantages

A

Adv: pooling of ideas, diffusion of responsibility, members understand and buy into decisions made, higher value of commitment

Negs: timescales, team decisions could be inferior- trying to balance too much, team priorities vary from organisations, poor compromise - worse decision