Team Characteristics Flashcards

1
Q

Team

A

two or more people who work interdependently over some time period in order to accomplish common goals related to some task-oriented purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Input-Process-Output (IPO)

A

framework used to describe what

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Team Development Models

A
  • Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development
  • Punctuated Equilibrium Theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development

A
  • Forming
  • Storming
  • Norming
  • Performing
  • Adjourning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Forming (Tuckman’s Stage 1)

A

Members orient themselves by trying to understand their boundaries in the team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Storming (Tuckman’s Stage 2)

A

Members remain committed to ideas they bring with them to the team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Norming (Tuckman’s Stage 3)

A

Members realize that they beed to work together to accomplish team goals and consequently they begin to cooperate with one another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Performing (Tuckman’s Stage 4)

A

Members are comfortable working within their roles and the team makes progress toward goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Adjourning (Tuckman’s Stage 5)

A

Members experience anxiety and other emotions as they disengage and ultimately separate from the team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Punctuated Equilibrium Theory

A

Initial meeting -> inertia -> punctuated equilibrium -> process revision -> inertia

  • Initial Team Meeting: members make assumptions and establish a pattern of behavior that lasts for the first half of the projects life
  • Midway Point: members realize that they have to change their work model fundamentally to complete it on time “Whoa our time is almost up… things get serious”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Team Interdependence

A

the way members of a team are linked to each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of Team Interdependence

A
  • Goal Interdependence
  • Outcome Interdependence
  • Task Interdependence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Goal Interdependence

A

members have shared vision of team goals and align their personal goals with that vision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outcome Interdependence

A

members are linked in terms of outcomes they receive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Task Interdependence

A

the degree to which team members interact with and rely on each other for the information, materials, and resources to accomplish team tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Team Interdependence

A

the way members of a team are linked to each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Types of Task Interdependence

A
  • Pooled Interdependence
  • Sequential Interdependence
  • Reciprocal Interdependence
  • Comprehensive Interdependence
18
Q

Pooled Interdependence

A

group members complete their work assignments independently, then this work is ‘piled up’ to represent the group’s output (everyone does their own work and combines at the end)

19
Q

Sequential Interdependence

A

different tasks are done in a certain order and the group is structured so that each member specializes in a task (each person works on their step to give to the next)

20
Q

Reciprocal Interdependence

A

members are specialized to perform specific tasks and members interact with a subset of other members to complete the team’s work (some people work with some other people)

21
Q

Comprehensive Interdependence

A

each member had a great deal of discretion in what they do and with whom they interact through the course of the project (everyone works with everyone)

22
Q

Pros/Cons of Task Interdependence

A

Efficiency vs. Coordination
Efficiency (pooled and sequential)
– Pro: more efficient in coordination and communication
– Con: Less capable of adapting to new situations because of lack of member communication and knowledge

Coordination (reciprocal and comprehensive)
– Pro: more capable of adapting to new situation because of high interaction
– Con: Spend more time on communication and coordination - decreasing productivity

23
Q

Team Composition

A

Who makes up the team
- size, roles, ability, personality, diversity

24
Q

Team Size

A

4-5 people is ideal
- Jeff Bezos “if we can’t feed the team with 2 pizzas its too big”
Options: more the merrier – too many cooks spoil the pot

25
Q

Member Roles

A

Task Roles
Team Building Roles
Individualistic Roles

26
Q

Task Roles (Member Roles)

A

‘Task Performance’
- Initiator/Contributor
- Coordinator
- Orienter
- Devil’s Advocate
- Energizer
- Procedural/Technician

27
Q

Team Building Roles (Member Roles)

A

‘Citizenship Behavior’
- Encourager
- Harmonizer
- Compromiser
- Gatekeeper/Expediter
- Standard Setter
- Follower

28
Q

Individualistic Roles (Member Roles)

A

‘Counterproductive Behavior’
- Aggressor
- Blocker
- Dominator
- Recognition Seeker
- Self-Confessor
- Slacker

29
Q

Member Personality

A
  • Agreeable (more cooperative, trusting, promote positive attitudes about the team, smooth interpersonal interactions)
  • Conscientious (dependable, work hard to achieve goals)
  • Extraverted (perform effectively interpersonally, positive, optimistic)
30
Q

Warning about Member Personality

A

Too Agreeable – enhance harmony but lose task performance increase group think

Too Extraverted – power struggles, unproductive conflict b/c assertive and dominant personalities

31
Q

Member Ability

A

Aside from general cognitive ability - team success depends on the structure of the task

32
Q

Types of Task Structure

A
  • Disjunctive
  • Conjunctive
  • Additive
33
Q

Disjunctive Task Structure

A

The entire group needs to come up with a single solution
- Highest member ability determines team performance
Ex. Quiz Team

34
Q

Conjunctive Task Structure

A

Each member of the group needs to contribute for the groups success
- Lowest member ability determines team performance
Ex. relay race

35
Q

Additive Task Structure

A

All members’ contributions are added together
- All members’ ability are added up to determine team performance
Ex. climbing a mountain or tug-o-rope

36
Q

Team Diversity

A

degree to which members are different from one another in terms of any attribute that might be used as a basis for categorizing people (race, gender, nationality, age, expertise, experience, personality, ability, values/beliefs)

37
Q

Value in Diversity Problem Solving Approach

A

More diversity stimulates exchange of knowledge and information - which fosters learning among team members
- diversity is GOOD especially for ethnicity, expertise, personality, and attitudes

38
Q

Similarity Attraction Approach

A

People tend to be attracted to those perceived as similar and avoid interacting with those dissimilar
- diversity is BAD especially for race and culture

39
Q

Surface-level Diversity

A

diversity based on OBSERVABLE attitudes
- Gender
- Race
- Age
- Ability/Disabilities
(small negative relationship with team performance or no relation)

40
Q

Deep-level Diversity

A

diversity based on attributes that are inferred with experience
- Values
- Attitudes
- Beliefs
- Personality
(positively related to team performance)

41
Q

Characteristics of an Effective Team

A
  • 4-5 people
  • deep level diversity
  • comprehensive task interdependence
  • mix of personalities
  • task and team building roles
  • Tuckman’s Theory