Task 7 Flashcards
Explain the assumptions of fNIRS:
- Active areas need Oxygen
- Oxygen is carried by Hemoglobin
- Hemoglobin absorbs light in a banana shaped way
- Oxygenated HB and deoxygenated HB blood have different optical properties -> They absorb different wavelength
What are the different optical properties of Oxygenated and Deoxgynated blood ?
- > Oxygenated = 850
- > Deoxyenated = 760
- > in general it is the range bewteen 700 -900 nm
Describe the Method of fNIRS:
- > 2 types of wavenlgth inform of near infrared light are introduced by the brain
- > Photons pass trough tissues and are then absorbed by Oxy or Deoxy hemoglobin
- > After absorption the rest of the photons will be refelected
- > The more Oxy is present the less 750 wavelength will be reflected
- > Based on the difference (how much came in and how much came out) we can estimate which regions were active
What is an important rule of fNIRS ?
-> When less Oxy will be reflected then more deoxy will be reflected
What are the limitaions of fNIRS?
-> Does only measure surface brain tissues 2-3 mm
What is an optode ?
= light source of fNIRS
What do you need for an fNIRS scan ?
-> Optode + detector
What happens if we vary the distance between optode and detector ?
- > Higher distance = more depth
- > Higher distance = less quality signal
- > Usually placed 2-7cm away from Optode
- > best is 3 cm
What is meant by event related optical signal ?
-> Measure change in optical properties at cell membranes themselves
-> more a direct meassure (better temporal resolution)
BUt lower SNR
What are more preceise fnirs method and why ?
- Frequency domain systems
- Time-resolves systems
- > both use leaser (more dangerous and expensive larger)
What is a less preceise fnirs method and why ?
- > Continuous wave (CW)
- > Since it uses light instead of leaser
- > Cheaper / smaller / less dangerous
Name some Pro of fNIRS:
- > Two Dependent variables
- > Save / non invasive
- > Low coast
- > Portable
- > Can be integrated with other technologies
- > No vulnerability to electromagnetic environment
Name some Con of fNIRS:
- > Light scattering / absorption by Skin / hair
- > Limited spatial resolution only reaching surface
- > Can not do comparisons of fNIRS data between subject
- > Limitations in the use of cranial reference points
What does fNIRS and fMRI have in common ?
- > Indirect meassurments
- > Both achived similar outcomes
Why is fNIRS worse then fMRI ?
- > Lowers spatial resolution
- > Limited to outer cortex