Task 6 - Surfing the edge of chaos Flashcards

1
Q

Dynamic system

A

A system whose changes over time can be characterized by a set of equations that show how current values of variables depend mathematically on previous values of those variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

State space

A

The set of states that a dynamic system can be in, determined by the variables that are used to measure it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Attractors

A

Dynamic systems have attractors (relatively stable states) that they tend to settle to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Phase transition

A

Changes from one attractor state to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dynamic systems challenge to cognitive science

A

The mind should be seen as a dynamic system instead from a computational-representational perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Complex systems theory

A

Complex systems all have certain principles in common that predict their behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Basin of attraction

A

The set of states that are attracted by (i.e. will evolve toward) the attractor. Each attractor has a basin of attraction (what forms the walls basically)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does it mean for a system to be in a deep basin of attraction?

A

Means its resilient/stable, will not be easily perturbed and pushed out of current state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hysteris

A

The fact that recovery is not linearly related to the removal of the cause of the shift.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Early warning signs (EWS)

A

Show you that a complex system is about to change:
1. Increases in autocorrelation
2. Increases in variance
3. Flickering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Network perspective

A
  • Theorizes that symptoms can also trigger each other and thereby form clusters of cooccurring symptoms in a self-organized (bottom-up) fashion
  • Lumping together of some symptoms more often than others can be explained by the fact that a certain mental state (e.g. feeling down) easily triggers another mental state (e.g. worrying), but not so easily another mental state (e.g. the feeling of being watched)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bridge symptoms

Network theory

A

Symptoms that connect across boundaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intractable conflict

A

A conflict that persists because it seems impossible to resolve. It is differentiated from tractable conflicts by its persistence, destructiveness, and resistance to
resolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Intractable conflict and dynamic systems theory

A

Intractable conflict could be seem as an attractor, meaning that to produce long-lasting change, one had to change the system is such a way that the equilibrium is changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Catastrophe theory

A
  • A mathematical theory that deals with sudden & unexpected changes in systems.
  • Primarily concerned with understanding how small changes in certain parameters of a system can lead to sudden, dramatic and discontinuous changes
  • These abrupt changes are referred to as catastrophes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Self-organization

A

The process whereby order emerges because of the interactions among system elements rather than because of the intervention of higher-order agents.

17
Q

The 4 elementary catastrophes

Catastrophe theory

A
  1. The fold catastrophe
  2. The cusp catastrophe
  3. The swallowtail catastrophe
  4. The butterfly catastrophe
18
Q

Cusp catastrophe

A

The catastrophe that can occur when there are 2 control variables and 1 behavior variable.

19
Q

A-not-B task

A

Task used by researchers to establish when infants acquire the concept of object permanence:
* Experimenter hides a toy under a lid at location A, repeated several times.
* On a switch trial, the experimenter hides the object at a new location B.
* If there is a short delay between hiding and reaching, 8-10 month infants reach not to where they saw the object disappear, but back to A (A-not-B error)

(Can be explained by dynamic field model)