Task 1 Flashcards
Two key concepts underlie the cognitive approach:
- Information processing depends on internal representations
- These mental representations undergo transformations.
The fact that RT vary (especially in the same category condition) shows
that we have representations of the physical, identity (a = A) and abstraction (category) of a stimuli
Internal transformations
Our mental representations undergo transformations (i.e. memories about smells transform olfactory sensations into memories). The most common transformation is that of sensations being transformed into perceptions being transformed into actions. This can be altered through memories (i.e. when you’re scared of dogs you wont pet a dog that others would
Word superiority effect
people are most accurate in identifying a target letter when the stimuli are words, which suggests that we do not need to identify all the letters of a word before we recognize the word.
etter and word
representations are activated in parallel which facilitates performance
Mental chronometry
the study of the organization and timing of mental processes.
the subtraction method
he constructed two tasks that differ only in a single component of processing, and measure reaction time in both tasks. Then subtract the reaction times; the outcome is the duration of that single component. The same simple subtraction forms the basis of modern functional brain imaging techniques (EEG, fMRI, …).
Operationally defined, reaction time is the time interval between the onset of a stimulus and the overt response to that stimulus, in this case the button press. However theoretically…
Assumption: that the participant intends to be “as fast as possible without making errors”
We can therefore theoretically define RT as the minimum amount of time needed by the participant
to produce a correct response.
Speed-accuracy tradeoff
more errors happen when the participant tries to be really fast, but most researchers prefer this over perfect performance, just to avoid the risk that the participant takes more time than actually needed
why measure RT?
-reliabilty & orderliness (RT is interesting when there are sensitive differences between experimental conditions)
. - scale properties: there is a meaningful zero point=> can be interpreted easily (often measured variable is time)
-Rt is the only property of mental processes we can measure
limitation of RT
- only simple tasks (rt with 100-200 ms)
-rt can only reflect the end product of the process
=> we can only observe output and make guesses what happens in between
-Knowledge of processes involved in a task: In practice, we may not have prior knowledge about which exact kind of stage is added or removed when we change the task in some way
donders substraction method
A: sensory time + motor time =201 ms
B: sensory time+discrimination time+ response selection time +motor time =284 ms
C: sensory time+ discrimination time + motor time =237 ms
subtracting B-C gives duration of response selection
subtracting C-A gives the duration of stimulus discrimination
Donders task assumptions
seriality
pure insertion
=> critique because for example lower readiness to respond can also effect motor processes
knowledge of processes involved in task
=>In practice, we may not have prior knowledge about which exact kind of stage is added or removed when we change the task in some way
Sternberg’s Memory Search Task
This task attempted to purely insert multiple processing steps.
On each trial, a set of letters is presented, and the participant is asked to memorize them. This set can contain from 1 to 6 letters. After the letters have disappeared, a single ‘probe’ stimulus is presented, and it is to be decided whether the probe letter is a member of the just memorized set. A “YES” or a “NO” response can then be given.
overall findings of Sternbergs task
Mean RT appear to increase linearly with the number of items held in memory
The slope is similar for positive and negative responses, even though they require exhaustive searching of the entire set (whereas positive responses are self-terminating). This suggests that participants continue to search the set, even after they found a match (non-optimality).
The fact that the function is linear suggests that the time to scan each single item does not depend on the total size of the set (= orderliness of RT).
additive factor method
propositions
- Serial / successive processing: information is processed serially and each stage performs some transformation on its input, producing some output that is passed on to the next stage (evidence: successive levels of the visual system)
- Constant output: manipulation to increase RT increases the duration of one or more processing stages but does not change the output of that stage. The output is therefore independent of the duration. If the output of some stage is constant, it can be seen that the next stage can then act as normal. Later processing stages cannot compensate for delays earlier on. An increased duration of some stage is simply propagated through all following stages to the final response.
- Total RT is the sum of the stage durations
- If two different manipulations affect two different stages, they will produce independent effects on total RT: the effects should be additive and not interact in statistical sense
- If 2 manipulations interact (modify each other) they must affect some stage in common
Additivity of effects of two factors is consistent with the presence of two processing stages
AFM does not contain the assumption of pure insertion