Surrender Values Flashcards
List 5 reasons for not having a surrender value under a term assurance
1) Low asset shares
2) Cost of selective withdrawals
3) To recoup losses on early lapses by making some profit on later lapses
4) It would be difficult to devise a surrender value scale to treat policyholders fairly due to the volatility of asset shares
5) Asset shares can become negative at later durations and it would be difficult to sell the idea of decreasing surrender values to policyholders
List the factors to consider in determining without-profits surrender values
DaMn PAPACIES
Documentation
a
Maturity values projected
n
Premiums paid
Asset shares
PRE
Avoid frequent changes
Competition
Illustrations given to customers
Ease of calculation
Selection against insurer
Auction value
The value it would fetch if the policyholder were to transfer it as an ongoing policy to someone else. Such transactions are usually dealt with by specialized brokers.
Advantages of using the auction value as the surrender value
1) Is an independent assessment of policy value
2) Is perhaps more likely to result in a value which the policyholder has to accept as fair
Disadvantages of using the auction value as the surrender value
1) The underlying assumptions for auction values would probably be different to the company’s own assumptions
2) The auction value may fluctuate unpredictably and so it may be difficult to determine without actually offering the policy for sale
How does asset share differ from supervisory reserves?
Asset share represents the money that the company has really accumulated in respect of any policy, while the supervisory reserves represent how much money the company must hold in respect of a policy
List two ways in which the asset share may be averaged over time
1) If we do the asset share calculations every so often for practicality, we will be implicitly averaging over the period between calculations
2) Asset shares can be smoothed over a specified time period so that the impact of smoothing over that period is zero
Retrospective policy value
Acc(past income) - acc(past outgo)
Represents the earned asset share at the date of surrender (or an estimate thereof) and thus represents the maximum surrender value the company could pay without making a loss.
Advantages of the retrospective policy value as a surrender value
1) At early durations it will not look too unreasonable compared to premiums paid less initial expenses (assuming policyholders accept the expense deduction)
2) Not overly complex
Disadvantages of the retrospective policy value as a surrender value
1) It does not say anything about the profit the company would have made if the contract were not surrendered
2) Hence it is not easy to ensure equity (either with continuing policyholders or any shareholders)
3) Except by chance, the surrender value will not run into the maturity value
4) Because the method excludes future benefits, it could produce surrender values that differ significantly from a realistic prospective approach
Prospective policy value
EPV(future outgo) - EPV(future income)
Advantages of the prospective policy value as a surrender value
1) If calculated on a realistic basis, it will produce a surrender value that represents what the contract is worth to the company (ie the cost of surrender is equal to the expected cost of the contract remaining in force)
2) Surrender value will run into maturity value for without-profits contracts
3) Relatively easy to use since it does not require any knowledge of what happened in the past
4) More likely to produce surrender values comparable to those available at auction
Disadvantages of the prospective policy value as a surrender value
1) A realistic basis may produce very low or negative surrender values early in the term of the contract
How will the surrender value for a unit-linked contract be calculated?
The surrender value will typically be the bid value of the units, less any surrender penalty that applies.
This surrender penality may be:
- a % of the unit value
- a % of the premium
List the considerations when setting a basis for a retrospective policy value calculation
1) Past experience
2) Smoothing of investment return
3) Competitive considerations
4) Marketing considerations
5) Profit-rentention
6) Prudence