Summa Week 13 Flashcards

1
Q

What do we refer to as analysis of covariance?

A

ANCOVA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When and why do we use ANCOVA?

A

to test for differences between group means when we know that an extraneous variable affects the outcome variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does ANCOVA control?

A

known extraneous and confounding variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an advantage for ANCOVA re: variance?

A

reduces error variance by explaining some of the unexplained variance (SSerror), the error variance in the model can be reduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an advantage for ANCOVA re: control?

A

greater experimental control of confounds earns the researcher greater insight into the effect of the predictor variable(s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do we partition variance in ANCOVA?

A

SStotal = SStreatment + SSerror + covariate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What kind of test would have nine participants randomly assigned to 1 of three groups instructed by three teaching methods: A, B, C, and the DV is a measure of math achievement obtained after the experiment is completed?

A

a simple 1-way between-subjects ANOVA with the IV of teaching method (3 levels) and DV of math achievement test score

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If in a simple 1-way between-subjects ANOVA with the IV of teaching method (3 levels) and DV of math achievement test score test an experiment measures math aptitude before the experiment begins, what kind of test does it become?

A

a 1-way between subjects ANCOVA
IV: teaching method (3 levels)
covariance: math aptitude
DV: math achievement test score

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In a 1-way between subjects ANCOVA
IV: teaching method (3 levels)
covariance: math aptitude
DV: math achievement test score, why is it ANCOVA?

A

We cannot reasonably attribute the group difference in math achievement to teaching methods, and we cannot ignore the measurement of math aptitude. the differences among the mean scores of math achievement tests are caused by different instruction methods AND participants’ math aptitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why does the effect of the covariate need to be removed when using the regression method?

A

to control the source of variation due to the initial difference from the IV, not the covariate, a confounding variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why do we use adjusted means for ANCOVA?

A

it acknowledges the potential impact of the ANCOVA by zeroing in on what is due to the covariate, thereby limiting the data to the potential impact of the IV(s) alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the first step for adjusting means in ANCOVA?

A

do a regression analysis of the DV from the covariate for each group, and then get the slope value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the second step for adjusting means in ANCOVA?

A

calculate the adjusted means by using the formula:

= the adjusted mean of the DV for each group equals the mean of the DV for EACH group minus the slope which is multiplied by (the mean iof the covariate for each group minus the mean of the covariate for ALL groups)
= MadjDV = MDV - b*(Mcovpergroup - Mcovtotal)

e.g. adjusted means of achievement scores = means of achievement scores minus slope times (mean of aptitude test per group - mean of aptitude test for all groups)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does the adjusted means process look like given the example of the achievement scores using teaching and covariate of aptitude test?

A

= MadjDV = MDV - b*(Mcovpergroup - Mcovtotal)

e.g. adjusted means of achievement scores = means of achievement scores minus slope times (mean of aptitude test per group - mean of aptitude test for all groups)

= MadjA = 4.33 = 0.75 * (6.00 - 7.11) = 5.16 (vs. DV of 4.33)
= MadjB = 8.33 - 0.93 * (6.67 - 7.11) = 8.74 (vs. DV of 8.33)
= MadjC = 11.33 - 0.71 *(8.67 - 7.11) = 10.22 (vs. DV of 11.33)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the assumption of equal slopes?

A

the ANCOVA assumes a LINEAR relationship between the covariate and the DV and there is no interaction between the covariate and treatments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is there a strong linear relationship between the DV and covariate scores within all levels of the IV?

A

if so, then it is a significant relationship in a 1-way between-subjects ANCOVA

17
Q

Are the slopes of the liens relating DV and covariate the same for the three levels of IV?

A

If so, then it would imply a significant IV-by-covariate interaction, which would require looking into the simple effects. If not found significant, then looking at the main effects would be preferable

18
Q

How do you test the assumption of equal slopes in SPSS?

A

Analyze - General LInear MOdel - Univariate;
select DV and move it to the DV, select IV and move it to the fixed factor box, and covariate to the covariate, with options for IV in factor and move it to the Display means, select Descriptive stats, estimates of effect size, and homogeneity tests, as well as model - custom in the factors and covariate, select IV and covariate and move them into the model box for main effects as build terms, select them again for interaction as well

19
Q

What line is the test of the homogeneity of slopes assumption in an ANCOVA SPSS summary table?

A

found in the interaction line between the IV and covariate (METHOD * APT for example), with the df, and F value and Signature indicated for the analysis

20
Q

How would you present a homogeneity-of-slopes analysis in APA?

A

e.g. A preliminary analysis evaluating the homogeneity-of-slopes assumption indicated that the interaction effect of teaching method and math aptitude test score is not significant, F(2,3) = 0.18, p = .846. The covariate (math aptitude test score) was linearly related to the DV (math achievement test score) within all levels of the teaching methods. The homogeneity-of-slopes assumption was met and we could proceed to conduct a one-way ANCOVA.

21
Q

What does a significant homogeneity-of-slopes analysis imply?

A

differences in the DV are attributable not only to differences among the IV, but also to the initial differences in the covariate

22
Q

In order to control the source of variability in a homogeneity-of-slopes analysis, what stat technique is used?

A

ANCOVA

23
Q

What lines in the SPSS output are used for the homogeneity-of-slopes analysis in an ANCOVA test?

A

the Source line for labelling the covariate, the method, and the CORRECTED total (note the regular total uses a df that is too high)

24
Q

What can be done following a significant result in an ANCOVA?

A

pairwise comparisons to figure out which adjusted means differ with each other (ANCOVA is still an omnibus test)

25
Q

An example of an ANCOVA analysis for APA:

A

A one-way ANCOVA was conducted. the IV included ___ levels: A, B, and C. the DV was ___ and the covariate was the ____. The results of the ANCOVA indicated that there were significant differences among the three adjusted means, F(2,5) = 54.29, p < .001, suggesting a strong relationship between DV and IV, controlling for covariate. A pairwise comparison of levels of IV indicated that…