SU 14: Evidence Key Considerations Flashcards
Primary source for litigation claims is
Client’s Management, per AU 337 management is responsible for adopting policies and procedures to identify, evaluate and account for lit claims with GAAP
In determining the lawyer’s response to lit matters considered individually or collectively material who must have an understanding of materiality
The lawyer and auditor. Lawyers response to an auditor’s inquiry about litigation may be limited to those that are considered to be material to the f/s, provided the lawyer and auditor have reached an understanding of materiality (AU 337)
The reason for request that a letter of inquiry be sent to client’s lawyer.
To corraborate management’s assertion about litigation
Client is a defendant in a patent infringement lawsuit which would least likely be included in lawyer’s letter.
Going concern if maximum unfavorable damages are awarded. The lawyer does not have expertise to or information to make a judgement about the client’s going concern.
Scope of an audit is NOT restricted when an attorney’s response to an auditor limits responses to
Matters to which the attorney has given substantive attention in the form of legal representation. AU 337 states that two limitations on the lawyer’s response will not be considered scope limitation. The response is limited to matters lawyer has give substantive attention to on behalf of the cleint. Also, if the the lawyer and auditor have come to an understanding on materiality, the response can be limited to individually or collective material items.
Subsequent Procedures Include
- ) Reading latest interim statements and comparing to stmts being reported on
- ) Inquiring about and discussing w/mgmt various financial accounting matters
- ) Reading BOD minutes
- ) Obtain letters of representation from mgmt
- ) Inquiring of legal counsel
- ) Performing further procedures deemed necessary
Procedures to obtain evidence about occurrence of subsequent events
Inquiring of legal counsel concerning lit and assessments arising after y/e. Procedures applied after the balance sheet date should include examination of data to determine that proper cutoffs have been made to evaluate assets and liabilities at bs date. The auditor should perform procedures w respect to sub events period to ascertain whether events have occurred that may require adj or disclosure essential to fair presentation of f/s (AU 560)
Procedures performed in obtain evidence about subsequent events
Investigate changes in non-current debt occurring after ye. Procedures that s/b performed on or near the end of fieldwork include investigating any change in capital stock, non-current debt, and working capital. Events related to these accounts may require revision to y/e f/s or disclosure in notes
Customer bankruptcy effecting trade receivables 10 days after BS date but 1 month before issuance. Which of the 3 should be done: F/S s/b ADJ/ Disclosure no ADJ/Modified Auditor’s report
Disclosure with no Adjustment
Certain subsequent events may provide additional evidence about conditions at the date of the BS and affect estimates inherent in preparation of statements. These events require adjustment to client’s f/s at y/e. Other sub events provide evidence of conditions not existing at BS date but arising subsequent affecting the interpretation of y/e f/s. These events may require disclosure but do not require ADJ. The report is unaffected.
What are the procedures for obtaining evidence about occurrence of subsequent events (specific procedures)
Procedures performed at or near the end of fieldwork normally include inquiring of mgmt re: (1) whether interim statements were prepared on the same basis as statements being reported on (2) whether substantial contingent liabilities or commitments existed at the BS date (3) whether unusual ADJ were made during subsequent period (4) Whether any significant change has occurred in equity (5) current status of items that were accounted for on the basis of tentative, preliminary or inconclusive data.
After issuance of f/s client decided to sell accounts that equate to 30% of revenue to subsidiary the auditor should?
Take no action because the auditor has no obligation to make further inquiries. AU 561 states “after the date of the report the auditor has no obligation to make further or continuing inquiry or perform any further auditing procedures with respect to audited f/s covered by the report unless the new information may effect the report comes to their attention.
An event that would cause auditor to make further inquiries about after the issuance of f/s
New information about undisclosed lease transaction of the audited period. The auditor may become aware of information that (1) relates to prior f/s (2) was not know to them at the date of the report. (3) they would have investigated it if it had been discovered during the audit. In this case the auditor should undertake to determine if info is reliable and whether facts existed at report date. (AU 561)
What documentation is required for audit under GAAS
Management representation letter (AU 333). Written representations corroborate info received orally from mgmt but do not substitute for necessary procedures to afford reasonable basis for opinion
Types of statements in Mgmt Rep Letter
If applicable the list includes disclosure of guarantees whether written or oral which the entity is contingently liable.
Which matters would an auditor not apply materiality limits to when obtaining specific mgmt reps
Fraud involving employees with significant roles in internal control. Management representations may be limted to matters that are considered individually or collectively material on condition that mgmt and auditor have reached an understanding of materiality. Such limits do not apply to certain reps not directly related to amounts in the f/s, e.g. acknowledgement of responsibility for fair presentation, availability of records and knowledge of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the entity involving (1) mgmt (2) employees with significant activity in internal control (3) or others if fraud could have material affect on f/s