Study Questions of Theology - God's Way of Salvation Flashcards
What is a covenant?
A sovereignly administered bond with stipulations and sanctions (Pipa)
What is the Covenant of Works (Life)?
“When God had created man, he entered into a covenant of life with him, upon condition of perfect obedience; for-bidding him to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, upon the pain of death.”—WSC #12
Who are its parties?
God and Adam as representative of all man.
Prove that it was a covenant
a. It was a; Promise: Eternal life; Stipulation: Not eat the fruit of the knowledge of God and evil; Sacrament: Garden
b. It is called a Covenant in Hosea 6:7
c. It was broken Job 31:33
d. It does not have the name covenant like the Davidic covenant in 2 Sam7:23 ( It is called a covenant in Psalm 89:3)
e. It had seals
f. It has threats: The death has 3 aspects; Judicial, which places the subject under the wrath of God; Spiritual, Adam lost communion with God; Physical death, we would have to suffer physical death
g. The parties of the Covenant: God and Adam are the parties of this covenant.
h. It had conditions: Perfect obedience
i. It had probation: Eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil
j. It had a promise: eternal life, the tree of life implies a promise of life
What is the Covenant of Redemption?
“God having out or hie mere good pleasure, from all eternity, elected some to everlasting life, did enter into a cov-enant of grace, to deliver them out of the estate of sin and misery, and to bring them into an estate of salvation by a Redeemer.”—WSC #20
The four names for this covenant?
- Nature; because it is founded on the nature of man (as it was at first created by God) and on his integrity or powers
- Legal; because the condition on man’s part was the observation of the law of nature engraved within him;
- Works; because it depended upon works or his proper obedience,
- Life: because it was promised eternal life.
How is the Covenant of Grace related to the Abrahamic Covenant?
One of the first stages in working out the promise of the seed. The promise of a redeemer was more specific. The grandeur of the purpose of God was more distinctly known. The Church was organized as a distinct visible or-ganization, separated for the world by the sign of circumcision.
How is the Covenant of Grace related to The Mosaic Covenant?
The simple theme of blood sacrifice was elaborately explained in the ritual of the tabernacle and temple services. The ethical provision of the covenant were expounded in the moral law.
How is the Covenant of Grace related to The Noahic Covenant?
Although sin has abounded God has promised to preserve Noah and his family, and the earth so that his cove-nant work may continue. But there was no change in the applicability of what had previously been revealed.
Discuss the relationship between the Old and New Covenants. Defend from Scripture.
- There is one covenant with different administrations.
“There are not therefore two covenants of grace, differing in substance, but one and the same, under various dis-pensations.”—WCF 7.6
“He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit.”—Galatians 3:14
- The Old and New covenants are distinct in that Scripture refers to them as Old and New.
“This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time, declares the Lord. I will put my laws in their minds and write them on their hearts. I will be their God and they will be my people.”—Hebrews 8:10 (Jeremi-ah 31:33)
“By calling this covenant ‘new’, he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disap-pear.”—Hebrews 8:13
- It is in this sense that the New covenant displaces the Old.
“By calling this covenant ‘new’, he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disap-pear.”—Hebrews 8:13
Explain and defend (with Scripture proofs} the orthodox doctrine of the person of Christ
“The only Redeemer of God’s elect is the Lord Jesus Christ, who, being the eternal Son of God, became man, and so was, and continues to be, God and man in two distinct natures, and one person, for ever.”-WSC #21
“The angel answered, ‘the Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy on to be born will be called the Son of God.”—Luke 1:35
“For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form…“—Colossians 2:9
“The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his pow-erful word.”—Hebrews 1:3
Best Rom 1:3-4 Romans 1:3–4 (ESV): concerning his Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh 4and was declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord,
Was Christ a human person?
Yes.
“Christ, being the Son of God, became man, by taking to himself a true body, and a reasonable soul, being con-ceived by the power of the Holy Spirit, in the womb of the virgin Mary, and born of her, yet without sin.”—
WSC #22
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God…The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us…“—John 1:1,14
Does Christ have a soul?
Christ, being the Son of God, became man, by taking to himself a true body, and a reasonable soul, being conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit, in the womb of the virgin Mary, and bom of her, yet without sin.
WSC #22
John 12:27
27“Now My soul is troubled, and what shall I say? ‘Father, save Me from this hour’? But for this purpose I came to this hour.
What is kenosis?
“The term “kenosis” is used in a twofold sense in theology. Originally it was used by Lutheran theologians to denote the self-limitation, not of the Logos, but of the God-man, whereby He, in the interest of His humiliation, laid aside the actual use of His divine attributes. In the teachings of the Kenoticists, however, it signalized the doctrine that the Logos at the incarnation was denuded of His transitive or of all His attributes, was reduced to a mere potentiality, and then, in union with the human nature, developed again into a divine-human person”
How do we know that Adam accepted the conditions?
a) He tried to hide himself form God after his sin. (Gen 3:13)
b) A Law was imposed upon Adam, which necessarily implies a federal agreement and contract.
c) Eve talked about God’s covenant (stipulation) to the serpent
d) Adam was in the estate of innocence, so he loved whatever God required and prepared for Adam
e) Adam’s shame proved his own violation against to the covenant
- How do we know that Adam Acted in behalf of the human race? What are Smith’s arguments?
(1) All that was said to Adam in punishment for his having broken the covenant applied to the whole race.
(2) The solidarity of the race, and the representative character of Adam is clearly taught in Romans 5:12 , 18 ; 1 Corinthians 15:22 .
(3) The plan of salvation is based on the same representative principle. Christ is compared to Adam as the Second Adam, or the Last Man ( Romans 5:12-21 ; 1 Corinthians 15:22 , 45-58 ).
(4) This principle of representation is seen to be operative in many of the institutions of human society, such as family, church and state.
Did Christ lay aside any of His divine attributes at the incarnation?
No.
“The Lord Jesus, in His human nature thus united to the divine, was sanctified, and anointed with the Holy Spirit, above measure, having in Him all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge; in whom it pleased the Father that all fullness should dwell; to the end that, being holy, harmless, undefiled, and full of grace and truth, He might be thoroughly furnished to execute the office of a Mediator and surety. Which office He took not unto Himself, but was thereunto called by His Father, who put all power and judgement into His hand, and gave Him commandment to ex-ecute the same.—WCF8.3
For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form…“—Colossians 2:9
Briefly explain and defend against the challenges to orthodox Christianity posed by: Docetism
-This was the view that said that the Son of God only “seemed” to become a man. The suffering and human aspects of Christ were imaginary or apparent instead of being part of a real incarnation.
“Now Thomas (called Didymus), one of the twelve, was not with the disciples when Jesus came. So the other disciples told him, “we have seen the Lord!”
But he said to them, “unless I see the marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe it.”
…Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.”
Thomas said to him, “my Lord and my God.”—John 20:24-25,27,28
Briefly explain and defend against the challenges to orthodox Christianity posed by: Arius
-He believed that Jesus was a heavenly being an intermediary between God and man, but still a created being.
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the begin-ning.”—
Briefly explain and defend against the challenges to orthodox Christianity posed by: Apollimarius
–Said that the soul was replaced by the logos so Jesus did not have a human soul. Allowed Christ only a divine nature and no human initiative.
“Christ, being the Son of God, became man, by taking to himself a true body, and a reasonable soul, being con-ceived by the power of the Holy Spirit, in the womb of the virgin Mary, and born of her, yet without sin.” — WSC ft22
Briefly explain and defend against the challenges to orthodox Christianity posed by: Eutyches
-Said that Christ had one nature, implying that Christ was a third something made from the mixture of Divinity and humanity.
“The only Redeemer of God’s elect is the Lord Jesus Christ, who, being the eternal Son of God, became man, and so was, and continues to be, God and man in two distinct natures, and one person, for ever.”—WSC #21