Study Notes Flashcards
The two primary dimensions of behavioral theories of leadership are
consideration and initiating structure.
Which statement exemplifies Hersey-Blanchard’s situational leadership theory?
A leader’s style must change over time as individuals develop and require a different type of direction and leadership.
In the contingency theory of leadership, what is the term for the degree of confidence, trust, and respect that followers have in their leader?
Leader-member relations
Peter Salovey and John D. Mayer define four branches of emotional intelligence:
- Perceiving emotion. Identifying and evaluating emotions in oneself and others. For example, the emotionally intelligent person is in tune with emotional shifts in a room during an organizational meeting.
- Using emotion to facilitate thought. Capitalizing on feelings to promote and inform decision making, problem solving, and other cognitive activities. The emotionally intelligent person can use changes in mood, for example, as an opportunity to approach a decision from multiple viewpoints.
Peter Salovey and John D. Mayer define four branches of emotional intelligence:
- Understanding emotion. Interpreting complex emotions and understanding their causes. The emotionally intelligent person, for example, can predict how employees’ emotions are likely to evolve following the announcement of structural changes to the organization.
- Regulating emotion. Tracking and managing one’s own and others’ emotions. For example, the emotionally intelligent person can detach from feeling angry about a particular problem if anger has proven limiting in helping to solve the problem.
What practice illustrates transparency?
Supporting promotions decisions with specific examples
What is the term for the proposition that ethical behavior is determined by local culture, laws, and business practices?
Cultural relativism
Conflict Resolution Modes: Accomodate (smooth)
The leader restores good relations by emphasizing agreement and downplaying disagreement. Useful when there is little time to be lost and movement forward is needed. It does not, however, address the root conflict. If the group continues, the conflict will probably recur.
Conflict Resolution Modes: Assert (or force)
The leader imposes a solution. One side wins and the other loses—hence the term “win/lose” conflict resolution.Useful in a crisis because it resolves the issue quickly; also when authority is being challenged or when the impact on future relations with the group is minimal. Like accommodation, it does not permanently address the problem.
Conflict Resolution Modes: Avoid
The leader withdraws from the situation or accepts it, leaving the conflict to be resolved by others or remain unresolved. Useful when the conflict will resolve soon without any direct intervention or when the conflict or relationship is not worth the time investment. Leaders should be aware that avoiding conflict can weaken their role in the organization and may damage the group by leaving a problem unresolved or allowing it to be poorly resolved.
Conflict Resolution Modes: Collaborate (or confront)
The leader and those in conflict accept the fact that they disagree and look for a “third way,” a new solution to the problem of the conflict. Since both sides contribute to the solution, this may be seen as “win/win” conflict resolution.Useful when the stakes are high, relationships are important, and time allows. (It does require time and strong interpersonal skills.) There is greater chance for an enduring, equitable, mutually satisfying resolution.
Conflict Resolution Modes: Compromise
The leader asks those in conflict to bargain—altering positions on different issues until a mutually acceptable solution is defined. The solution relies on concessions. For this reason, it is often referred to as “lose/lose” conflict resolution. Useful for complex issues, when both sides are determined to win, and when time doesn’t allow for true problem solving. Solutions may be temporary and only partially effective, but when strong personalities are involved, it does preserve the egos of all parties.
There are different negotiating styles, but they are commonly considered as soft, hard, or principled: SOFT
Soft negotiators value the relationship more than the outcome and will back down on issues in the interest of reaching agreement—even if they are no longer getting what they need.
There are different negotiating styles, but they are commonly considered as soft, hard, or principled: HARD
Hard negotiators are committed to winning, even at the cost of the relationship.
There are different negotiating styles, but they are commonly considered as soft, hard, or principled: Principled
Principled negotiators aim for mutual gain. They can separate people from positions and maintain focus on the issues. They identify common interests and make them a goal of the negotiation. This is referred to as interest-based or integrative bargaining. Principled negotiators are also creative: They come to the negotiation prepared with different options that may satisfy both sides.
Edward T. Hall—high- and low-context cultures
Context level affects communication and relationships:
High-context culture—A statement’s meaning includes the verbal message and the nonverbals and social and historic content attached to the statement.
Low-context culture—A statement’s meaning is encoded in its words only.