Structured Inequality (Ch. 7) Flashcards
(22 cards)
institutionalized inequality
determined by distribution of scarce resources (anything people want that isn’t abundant enough for everyone to have as much as they want -> income/wealth, prestige, power)
What does the fact that 1/2 of global wealth is held by top 1% of people indicate?
Inequality/disparity is increasing
significance of structured inequality
- inequality determines life chances -> access to power and resources to control life (ie. going to university) - lack of resources = vulnerability (ie. chronic illness, victimization, etc.) - more equal society -> less social/health problems
absolute poverty
lack basic necessities of life (clothing, food, shelter)
relative poverty
poor compared to average Canadian
3 measures of poverty
- low-income cut-off - market-basket measure - low-income measure
LICO (low-income cut-off)
spending over 55% of salary on food and shelter
Market-basket measure
based on purchases of food
LIM (low-income measure)
fixed percentage of average household income
who are the poor?
- well-educated and underemployed -> “working poor” -> 1/3 work full or part time, but work minimum wage labour - 20% of recent uni grads earn 1/2 of average salary - women, aboriginals, people with disabilities, etc. at higher risk for poverty
liberal ideology
- fairness - equal opportunity -> everyone gets a chance -> winners and losers are self-made - supports capitalism
meritocracy
society where advancement is based on individual achievement
social mobility
since the 70’s, wealth Canadian families saw income increase, middle class income stayed the same, and the lowest 20% of families saw income decrease
achieved status
- occupation: jobs that require extensive training and have higher income - schooling, which affects occupation and income -> prepares you for work - influenced by ascribed status
ascribed status
- ancestry: social standing of family you’re born into
occupational mobility
only exists in middle of hierarchy, very rare to go “from rags to riches” and move from bottom of hierarchy to top
education and economic inequality
- liberal ideology: stay in school, get a degree, you’ll be rewarded with a good job - fact: regardless of education, racialized people are still more likely to have lower-paying jobs, work less hours, or get paid less for same work
gender and economic inequality
women get paid less -> “women’s work” jobs like teachers, nurses, etc. are underpaid as well
power and economic inequality
power is source of wealth, occupation, schooling, etc.
how change theorists react to economic inequality
- advocate for equality of opportunity (same life chances for everyone) - this isn’t possible in a capitalist society though, because those with greater wealth/power control competition between people, born into privilege or not
why is there economic inequality?
- designed into structure of capitalism -> scarcity of work promotes competition and weakens class solidarity - surplus population of unemployed workers will accept cheaper wages - class system uses meritocracy to control who has access to middle class
criminalizing poverty
people in poverty aren’t contributing to capitalism, so they are criminalized (ie. squeegee kids, homeless people)