stereo Flashcards
typical stereo bone fractionations
24/2
30-40/5
max hot spot allowed in bone
135 % (150% of prescription dose)
constraints for spinal cord PRV DMAX, 2 fx, 3 fx, 5 fx
2 fx = 17 Gy
3 fx = 20 Gy
5 fx = 25 Gy
constraints for brainstem PRV DMAX, 2 fx, 3 fx, 5 fx
2 fx = 19 Gy
3 fx = 23 Gy
5 fx = 31 Gy
constraints for heart PRV DMAX, 2 fx, 3 fx, 5 fx
2 fx = 26 Gy
3 fx = 30 Gy
5 fx = 38 Gy
constraints for esophagus PRV DMAX, 2 fx, 3 fx, 5 fx
2 fx = 20 Gy
3 fx = 27 Gy
5 fx = 35 Gy
constraints for stomach PRV DMAX, 2 fx, 3 fx, 5 fx
2 fx = 20 Gy
3 fx = 22 Gy
5 fx = 32 Gy
constraints for bowel PRV DMAX, 2 fx, 3 fx, 5 fx
2 fx = 20 Gy
3 fx = 25 Gy
5 fx = 29 Gy
constraints for chest wall PRV DMAX, 2 fx, 3 fx, 5 fx
2 fx = 37 Gy
3 fx = 44 Gy
5 fx = 55 Gy
lung constraints for bone stereo
V20Gy < 3 %
mld < 5 Gy
stereo fractionations for brain
18-22/1
27/3
30-35/5
single fraction brainstem constraint
DMAX < 12.5 Gy
single fraction spinal cord constraint
DMAX < 13 Gy
single fraction brain - PTV constraint
< 10 cc 12 Gy
constraint for lens, eye, optic chiasm, 1-5 fxs
Dmax<10 Gy
in stereo, eye and optic nerves and chiasm <25 Gy for 5 fx, 20 Gy (eye), 17.4 Gy (optic nerves and chiasms) for 3 fx,
constraint for hippocampi, 1-5 fx
D100% <6.6 Gy
3 fraction brain - PTV constraint
< 10 cc 19 Gy
5 fraction brain - PTV constraint
< 10 cc 23 Gy
why DIBH or DEBH for liver?
-what are OARs?
- at HFX, liver less contorted with DEBH
- all about movement, not trying to get lung to expand
- OARs are bowel, stomach
liver fractionations
30-60/1 to 6, treatment every other day (usually 5 fractions)
look at mean liver - GTV dose- if too high, reduce prescription dose and re-evaluate. Dose should be 13-17 Gy for highest to lowest doses
what BED do we aim for in liver
BED10 of 100 Gy min in PTV (apha/beta = 10 Gy)
lung movement for free breathing vs bresath management
5-7 mm
max hot spot for lung and brain
108 % (120 % of PD)
define R50%
ratio of 50 % isodose to PD
- volume must be no greater than a set R50%, typically ~ 5 for standard PTV volume
- R50% we aim for decreases as PTV size increases
Define D2cm
- max total dose to any point 2 cm or greater awat from PTV
- aim for about 50% for standard PTV size
conformity index
- want < 1.2
- treated volume/ PTV volume
- to ensure volumes are actually conformal, use Paddick index ((union of volume)^2/(PTV * treated volume)
lung fractionation
34/1 30/1 48/4 (peripheral) 54/3 (peripheral) 60/8 60/15
1 fx constraint spinal cord dmax
14 Gy
1 fx constraint esophagus dmax
15 Gy
1 fx constraint heart dmax
22 Gy
8 fx constraints, spinal cord PRV dmax
32 Gy
lung constraints, 1-15 fx
V20Gy< 10 %
lung constraint 1-8 fx
mld < 6 Gy
lung constraint 15 fx
mld < 14 Gy
8 fx constraint, esophagus dmax
40 Gy
15 fx constraint, esophagus dmax
50 Gy
does DVH have longer tail in SBRT?
Yes, because more heteorgeneous
when do you do single fraction lung SABR vs multi fraction?
single: tumour diamters < 3 cm, > 2 cm away from chest wall, diaphgram, and lung apex
multi: tumour diameter < 5 cm, >2 cm from proximal tracheal bronchial tree
size of tuning rings
1-4 cm depending on person and site
prescription dose levels for liver
GTV is 108 % (120% of PD)
PTV is 90 %
What OARs is one concerned about for SABR re-treatment in lung?
- bronchi, esophagus, trachea
- major vessels seem to tolerate high dose
PTV margin for spine
ctv + 2mm
CTV margin for stereo
usually none
why use contrast for liver?
aids in tumor visualization
also need constrat free studies for planning (to avoid incorrect effective depth due to presence of high density contrast agent)
liver constraint
> 700 cc to get < 15 G
-mean liver dose (liver – GTV) has to be 13-17 Gy depending on dose
issue with using 1 isocetner for multiple mets
rotation of patient can mean mets at a distance away from isocenter won’t be treated
- more severe for smaller mets
- usually want all mets within 5 cm of iso
what is AAPM report on SRS
TG42
approximate time estimates for implementing SRS program
10 weeks commercial
3 years to design hardware and software
2years to do own software
1 year do do own hardware
stereo time requirements for treating typical patient
20 % of a typical patient weekly load
how many cobalt beams in gamma knife/
201 or 192, about 30 Ci each
precision of gamma knife vs stereo linac
0.1-0.4 mm vs 1 mm
dose % from gamma knife to eyes, hyroid, breast, gonads
eyes = 2.5 % thyroid = 0.2 % breast = 0.06% gonads = 0.02%
dose fall-off 45-90% in different tissues for stereo
brain - 6%/mm
bone - 4%/mm
lung- 3%/mm
how big does one expect distoritions from MRI to be?
displacements of 20 cm or more from the center of the magnetic field can produce distortions of 4 mm in the image
defining characteristics of SBRT
High dose per fraction High heterogeneity (prescribe to smaller isodose) sharp dose fall off High conformity
how to get sharp dose fall off in SBRT?
non-coplanar beams
small MLC widths (2.5 mm)
lower beam energy
what is often assessed for stereo plans that is not in conventional plans?
conformity index heterogeneity index (ratio of highest dose received by 5 % pf PTV to lowest dose received by 95 % of PTV)
why is physicist present for first stereo plan?
verify TP, machine, immobilization device, isocenter, make sure localization algorithm didn’t match to the wrong vertebrae!
why do non coplanar beams help with dose fall-off?
POP entrance and exits super-pose-non coplanar beams help avoid this
-more compact dose distribution
what are advantages of circular beams over rectangular ones?
easier calc of 3D dose distribution more precise dose delivery sharper beams better field definition for small fields faster dose fall-off outside volume
the 3 types of linac stereo
multiple non co planar or coplanar arcs- startionary patient
conical- patient rotates on treatment chair while gantry is stationary
dynamic- gantry and patient rotate in unison
advtange of conical SRT
all points of beam entry are in upper hemisphere on patients head and all exits are in lower hemisphere; never a POP
what is sacrificed in stereo for conformity?
homogeneity
what isodose is prescribed to for gamma kinfe? stereo linac?
-gamma kinfe- 50%
stereo linac- 80 or 90 %
pros and cons of using more isocenters
pro: more conformity, less dose to OARs
con: more heterogeneity in target (shallower DVH fall-off for target), more complexity, and more scattered/leakage dose to patient
what is a shot in gamma knife?
elliptical region of high dose
can be 4, 8, 16 mm