Stats Booklet 3 Flashcards
Data types
-quantitative
-qualitative
-primary
-secondary
Quantitative
Numeric form(1) Can be collected from individual scores in and the number of words and uses closed questions
Qualitative
1)descriptive 2)written form written such as from notes within an interview , diary entry from open questions
S/W of quantitative data
Quantitative is more simple analyse which allows comparison drawn between groups ,
S/w qualitative data
Types of data- NOMINAL DATA
Identify)justify)contex
1)categorical data
2)
3)hair categ
Types of data ordinal
1)ranked - ordered
2)not in fixedbintervals/ subjective
3)1-10 memory test/ iq test
Interval data
1)continuos data
2)standard/universal/official measurement
3)numerical scales
Primary data - define
S/W
1) data collected first hand from ppts specific to aim of study
2)E.g questionnaire exp, interviews
3) S- first hand data specific for aim of research which allows to target info ij a way to suit their aim(CONTEXTofaim) increasint IV
4) W-time and effort to obtain data and analyse findings, whereas secondary data is easily accessed (less eff+ time)
Secondary data - define
S/W
Link to IV
1)previously collected by a third party not specifically for aim of study and used by researcher
2)gov stats
3)S-easily accessed and min effort , info trying to collect already exists vs primary conducted by researcher themselves
4)W- may be poor quality data /inaccurate. Could be outdated and incomplete and not meet aim of study(C)
Meta analysis define(2)
1)reseArch that uses secondary data to gain data from many studies, which investigated same questions and methods of research
2)combines info from all studies to reach conclusions about behaviour
Meta analysis S/W
1)gather data from a range of studies, allow to view data with more confidence and increases generalisability of the finding across larger pop. Incresing EV
2)W- prone to publication bias, as reaearcher may not select all studies, choosing to leave out studies with -ve results. Thus biased data and may represent only some of the relevant data. Decres IV
Qualitative data- DEFINE CONTENT ANALYSIS (2)
1)a method of analysing qualitative data by converting large amount of qualitative data into quant.
2)identifying meaningful codes that can be counted, enabling us to present data in a graph
1)Why is appropriate to use a CONTENT ANALYSIS?
2) what is coding?
1)the data being analysed is qualitative data
2)coding is the initial process of CA where qual is converted into meaningful categories
How is a content analysis carried out(4)
1)read transcript or watch video of context
2)identify coding categories (C)
3)re read the diaries/questionnaire or relisten to recordings and tally everytime a code appears
4) present quant data in a graph
Define thematic analysis (2)
1)analysing qual data by identifying themes allowing to present data in quantitative form
2) interview recordings radio
Thematic analysis carried out(4)
1)if data is not in scenario read the transcript/ watch recordings (aggressive behaviour interview)
2)read and re read transcript
3)identify coding categories (shouting)
4)combine these codes to reduce number if codes into 4 themes that are linked(theme of aggression)
5)present data in qualitative format
Thematic analysis S/W
S- it is easy to assess the reliability of the findings and conclusions cause other researchers can access materials and use the coding systems to ensure findings are consistent
W- researchers bias,
-content confirms researchers hypothesis is more likely to be identify and compared to content that contradicts their aim (C).
-reducing IV
Assessing reliability of CAnalysis . Test retest
1) researchers creates coding categories (C) and tally eveytime it occurs within qual data
2)same researcher repeats the content analysis on same qualitative data, interview, tallying each time the coding category occurs
3)compare results from each CA and correlate results using stats test
4)strong +0.8 correlation shows high rel
Assessing reliability of CAnalysis. Inter rater reliability.(4)
1)the two raters would resd through the qual data separately but create coding categories together
2)two raters read the same content (aggressive behav) but record tally separately
3)compare tallies from both raters and correlate using stats test
4)strong +0.8
Assessing the validity of content analysis face va concurrent.
1)superficial method of analysing validity. And independent psychologist from the same field will check the coding category to see if researcher is measuring what they intend to measure at first sight. If they say yes CA is valid
2)comparing the results of a new CA with a CA results whose validity has already been established . If the results from both are similar is valid. A stats test
Improving validity of Content Analysis.(2)
1)ensure coding categories are operationalised
2)researcher are trained on how to use coding categories
Measures of central tendency VS measure of dispersion
TENDENCY - MMM
DISPERSION - SD / RANGE
Define measures of central tendency.(2)
1)average value in a set of data, e.g
2) mean, mode median