Stalking & Harassment Flashcards
Sections 1 & 2 Protection from Harassment Act 1997 states;
“A person must not…..
…pursue a course of conduct which;
(a) amounts to harassment of another, and…
(b) he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
(Section 2 merely states that - a person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1 or 1A commits an offence).
3 Defences area available to the section 2 offence, what are they?
- That the course of conduct was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime.
- That ut was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment.
- or.. that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable.
Section 1 sub section (1A) makes it an offence to what?
1 (1A) Protection from Harassment Act makes it an offence….
“for a person, or persons to pursue a course of conduct involving the harassment of 2 or more people - on separate occasions which the defendant knows or ought to know involves harassment, the purpose of which is to persuade any person* not to do something that he is entitled to do or to do something he is not under any obligation to do.
(* this does not have to be one the people being harassed).
Section 1 (1A) can be broken down into 6 points - name all 6…
- A person must not pursue a course of conduct…
- ..which involves harassment of 2 or more people and…
- .. which he knows or ought to know involves the harassment of those people and…
- ..by which he intends to persuade any person (whether or not they are mentioned above)…
- .. not to do something that he is entitled or required to do or…
- ..to do something he is not under any obligation to do.
For an offence under section 1 (1A) what is meant by a ‘course of conduct’ ?
A course of conduct must involve conduct on at least 2 occasions,
and regarding 2 or more persons - it means conduct on at least one occasion in relation to each person.
(Court will determine if- 2 or more amount to a ‘course of conduct’ leading to HAD
However the fewer and wider spread the incidents the less HAD will be proven).
Note: Incidents a year apart could be a course of conduct - for example; an anniversary.
Summarise “Harassment”
A series of incidents, that may not commission to a substantive offence, but when looked at as a ‘course of conduct’ are likely to cause fear, alarm or distress.
Summarise “Stalking”
A series of incidents that cause serious alarm or distress - and the suspect ought to have known this.
Can include loitering places the victim frequents.
Sending gifts.
Repeatedly contacting a victim, possibly monitoring their eMail and internet use.
Summarise “Controlling Behaviour”
A range of acts designed to make a person subordinate and or dependent by;
isolating them from sources of support,
exploiting their resources and capabilities for personal gain,
depriving them of the means needed for independence, resistance and escape
and regulating their every day behaviour.
Summarise “Coercive Behaviour”
A continuing act, or pattern of acts of assault, threats or humiliation and intimidation,
or other abuse used to harm, punish or frighten the victim.
With regards to “Course of Conduct Crimes” - when do we record a new offence?
One offence of stalking, controlling or coercive behaviour may not amount to a crime - HOWEVER…
when considered as a ‘series’ of individual incidents they are deemed a ‘course of conduct crime’.
Further incidents between the same parties - after it has been reported to Police - but no formal action has been taken - add these to the original Occ. & update OEL
* NO NEW CRIME *
If action HAS Been taken.
Record a new crime.
If there are other offences - record as the most serious.
In what priority would we consider offences in this area?
Stalking.
Harassment with Violence (Section 4)
Controlling & Coercive
Harassment without Violence (S2)
Section 7 of the Protection from Harassment Act determines the meaning of…..?
Harassment.
Including ‘alarm & distress’
Behaviour is repeated and unwanted.
Note: ‘likely to cause alarm or distress, can be either/or ‘alarm’ or ‘distress’ doesn’t have to be both together.
Summarise what is meant by “ought to know”
It’s an objective test.
It is irrelevant whether the accused was actually ‘subjectively aware’ their conduct amounted to harassment - even if they were oblivious.
They would still be guilty if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the conduct would amount to harassment.
PHA 1997 - Section 4 covers what aspect…?
‘Putting people in fear of violence’
Define Section 4, PHA 1997
“A person whose course of conduct..
..causes another to fear on at least 2 occasions..
that violence will be used against them..
IF
they know or ought to know that their course of conduct will cause the other to fear violence on each of those occasions.
** NOTE **
The course of conduct must cause the victim to fear violence WILL be used rather than MIGHT be used.
Beware: In previous exams…
Causing the victim to fear what MIGHT happen in the future is not enough.
(The violence in this offence can be in the future as long as the fear of it in present tense).