SPRING cog control across lifespan Flashcards

1
Q

steinberg 2013 development of exec function

A

court argues neurobio immaturity in adolescence so shouldnt be reprimanded for behaviour
early 20s > risk
dual systems model: hightened socioemotional processing thought to tax capacity of limited self reg abilities in young age - inclines adults towards risk and reward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is pruning

A

synaptic connections when young - increase till 2-4y

unnecesary connections removed and others strengthened to macimise speed of processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is myelination

A

myelin sheeth improve speed of synaptic transmission via saltatory conduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

blakemore and choudhury 2006 dev of white matter

A

MRI - steady increase in white mater in throughout hildhood and adol
younger more grey matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

sowell et al 1999 dev white matter

A

higher white matter in frontal and parietal cortex old>young

young > grey matter - pruning and less developed/prioritized connections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is grey matter made up of

A

neuronal cells, dendrites, myelinated and unmyelinated axons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

gogtay et al 2005 grey matter maturation

A

cross sectional longditudinal mri of 13 children every 2 years from 4-21y
grey loss in dorsal, parietal, primary sensory motor then spread to frontal and temporal cortices
follows maturation milestones ie motor and sensory dev early, then speech, lang and spatial, then exec function, thought etc
dlPFC last grey maturation, OF into 21y/o
white linear increase, grey loss region specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

grey vs white matter dev

A

grey NON LINEAR REGION SPECIFIC
white LINEAR
- grey increase till 12 then decline

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

grey matter and PFC dev (sowell et al 2001)

A

inverse relationship

gre decrease density (reduced no synapses) and DLPFC increase vol

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

dev of EF

A

basic function areas mature earlier ie motor/sensory - support goal directed beh
EF longer to mature ie spatial orientation and attention (Frontal lobe/DLPFC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

hwang et al 2010 antisaccade task - dev of top down control

A

antisaccade from target
adults top down control show increase connectivity to downstream cortical and subcortical areas assoc with occulomotor processing + decreases in short range connectivity to parietal/frontal regions
children more parietal and less top down
++ sig decrease in grey matter = more robust prepub increase in white in dPFC
adults better at inhibiting and saccading away and ability to override improves throughout dev

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

older brain characteristics

A

older experience greater decline in overall brain volume

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

exec funciton in aging

A

performance decreases from 20 y
vocab increase -experince
- ex.f. tasks depend on internal representation, maintenance and updating of context info in exerting control over thought and beh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Fotenos et al 208 brain vol with age

A

% grey matter + % wm ability sig decreases from 50 years

steeper with age - particularly in areas assoc with exec function and memory tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

lemaitre et al 2010 PFC with age

A

healthy brains of 18-87y/o
As ef decrease,age related declines in frontal gyri + PFC thickness, SA and vol
This is the area that is last to develop but also the first to decline – succeptable to brain changes across the lifespan
PARTICULARLY lateral and dorsomedial PFC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

age and amyg (van reekum et al)

A

change in EF also related to ability to suppress amyg activation despite increased cortical activity - greater response to bottom up
increase amyg = decrease EF capabilities

17
Q

Braver et al 2001 DA and PFC Function

A

canonical model
DA learn contingencies between stimuli and reward
processing and response to stimuli depend on weighting of reward prediction via DA system- increase DA = increase PFC prioritisation
PFC op down bias of context via mod gated channels
dlPFC reg access to context info

18
Q

hebb rat studies in cog decline

A

rat environ stimulation improve neural circuits and maze navigation

19
Q

smith et al 2009 cog tasks in old age

A

comp cog training 1 hour a day, 5 days a week for 8 weeks
improve on battery of tests: memory, attention, backward digit, letter no sequencing, verbal learning, delayed recall - NOT AREAS DIRECTLY TRAINED IN - generalised

20
Q

nouchi et al 2012

A

nintendo brain training games vs tetris
long and short term interventions
4 hours a day for 5 days or 1 hour a day for 4 weeks
more sig improvement over longer duration with shorter intervals - improved WM on n back and increase in white matter of dlPFC - some only improve in trained domain
-DEPENDS ON THE STRATEGIES USED WITHIN THE TASKS

21
Q

sandberg 2014 predictors of gain

A

strategy based intervention on ep memory - recall links between letters and no (ie d=25)
better pre task episodic memory = better improved memory (+ for speed of processing and verbal knowledge )
gain more if already good

22
Q

colcombe and cramer 2003 aeorbic

A

meta of aerobic on cog

fitness increase cog with greater influence on ef

23
Q

why might exercise improve cog

A

incerase in cerebral blood flow
change in hippocampus
social engagement and interactions
- improve levels of activation, processing of reward, change brain strucure/volume etc?

24
Q

eaton et al 2006 teens and risk

A

13000 adolsecents death in uk from motor vehicle crashes, unintentional injury, homicide and suicide

25
Q

van lejenhorst et al 2010 adolescents and risk in monetary reward

A

risk increase with increased reward across ages

teen peak in vmPFC and VS in adolescence - greater responsivity to emotionally valent stimuli/rewards

26
Q

dreyfuss et al 2014 go no go fear

A

adol specific increase in false alarms to threat stimuli
reflect failure to inhibit response to emotionally valient stimuli in the environment
- processing of neg/threat stimuli assoc with amyg activation (ledoux)

27
Q

winocur 1998 enrich enviorn

A

enriched in disadvantaged environ show redution in learn and memory - stay active

28
Q

smith et al 2009 cog assessments

A
improvements in 
memory
attention
backward digit 
letter no sequencing
delayed word recall
29
Q

guiney et al 2015 cerebral blood flow on cog

A

regular physical activity in young adults = greater aeorbic fitness = greater CBF reg and greater cog inhibition

30
Q

erikson 2011 hipp changes on cog

A

hipp shrinks into late adulthodo
BUT hipp and MTL increase in volume via exercise
active older adults show improved spatial memory following 2% increase in hipp volume
ONLY SPECIFIC AREAS IMPROVE