Sport psychology studies Flashcards

1
Q

Salas et al (1999) - team building

A

4 effective team processes - goal setting, role clarification problem solving, interpersonal relations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Gould et al (1999) - team building

A

unsuccessful teams had poor coach athlete relations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Paradis and Martin (2012) - team building

A

meta analysis

goal setting intervention most effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Carron et al (2014) - cohesion

A

elite university basketball players and club soccer players
positive relationship between cohesion and success percentage (r=0.55-0.67)
GEQ
task cohesion
perceptions of tam task cohesiveness relatively consistent among members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

slater and Sewell (1994)

A

high cohesion lead to increased self efficacy and future participation
male and female hockey
GEQ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rovio et al (2009) - cohesion

A

group cohesion can be harmful
junior ice hockey team
3 adults, 22 players
GEQ
video interviews, observation
high social cohesion led to decreased performance
pressure to conform to norms, maintenance of unanimity, reluctance to express critical opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mascarenhas et al (2005) - training decision making for coherence

A

pilot the use of video based training programs to develop referees SMMs
English rugby football union national referees
immediate decisions on pre and post tests of 10 real game videos
expert provided their view
lowest ranked referees significantly more accuracy by 17.43%
SMM training is appropriate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Garcia Gonzalez (2014) - training decision making

A

10 week decision making in tennis
training based on analysis of combining tactical questioning and video feed back
11 males
Nielsen and McPherson instrument used to assess decision making
Experimental group improved significantly in decision making and performance and maintained during retention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Callow et al (2009) - leadership

A

309 ultimate frisbee
GEQ
differentiated transformation leadership inventory - cohesion and performance
leadership behaviour of fostering acceptance of group goals and promoting team work predicted task and social cohesion and performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mesmer Magnus and DeChurch (2009) - communication

A
meta analysis (72 studies)
3 factors affected team information proessessing were found to enhance team information sharing: task demonstrability, discussion structure and co operation 
information sharing predicted team performance and cohesion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Grove and Lavelle (1997) - social identity

A

48 retired athletes
18 experienced highly stress reactions to retirement
higher the athletic identity at time of retiring, increased degree of emotional adjustment difficulties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gordon (1995) social identity

A

less likely to plan post athletic career

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sallis and Owen (1999)

A

5 phase framework - way of viewing various process in the understanding of PA

Measure PA–> establish links between PA and health –> determinants –> interventions –> translate into practise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly