SPIDER Acronym Flashcards
Critique of the study
> . What are the main findings/results?
. What are the overall conclusions?
. What were the strengths and limitations?
. Does the research question align with the methods, analysis, and conclusions?
. How trustworthy is the study?
. What are the implications for practice?
. What options for future research have arisen from this study?
Critique of the study findings/results
> . What themes emerged? (e.g. from conducting focus groups or interviews in qualitative studies)
. What statistics resulted? (e.g. from conducting a survey or measuring variables in quantitative studies)?
Overall conclusions of the study?
Discuss why this research matters:
>. Synthesize key points;
>. Demonstrate importance of ideas; and
>. Introduce new or expanded ways of thinking around the research topic.
Research Question
This is the phenomenon of interest we want to explore (e.g. pain, loneliness in chronic disease, experience of giving birth). Qualitative research questions are trying to explore/understand a phenomenon/experience.
Methodology
Refers to the approach or paradigm that underpins the research. A qualitative research methodology (ethnography, grounded theory, etc.) yields a different type of data from a quantitative research methodology. We will discuss quantitative methodologies in the 2nd half of this course.
Methods
Data collection techniques (in SPIDER TOOL this is the D or design)
Strengths and limitations
What were the strengths and limitations of the design of the study?
>. Was the selection of participants appropriate?
>. Was the method of data collection appropriate to the research question?
>. Was the data analysis process clearly described?
Trustworthiness has four aspects
> . Credibility
. Transferability
. Dependability
. Reflexivity (also known as confirmability)
Implications for practice
Impact of research on: >. Policy decisions; >. Related fields of interest; >. Development of theories; or >. Future research.
Future research is birthed out of the following
>. Building on a particular finding; >. Addressing a flaw in the research; >. Examining or testing a framework; >. Testing framework in new context; or >. Re-evaluating or expanding on a framework or model.