Speech production Lecture Flashcards
Give a very basic conceptual model of speech production
Message - Determine your message
\/
Syntax- determine the syntactical structure with slots for each word
\/
Morphemes- fill the syntactic structures with correct words based on morphemes
\/
Phonemes- choose the sounds that are pronounced
Describe the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
The specifics of language change (or determine) the content of thought- the language and therefore words we have may determine the concepts we have/ understand
>Linguistic determinism
>Linguistic relativism
Where did Mr Whorf get this idea of language determinism
He was a fire prevention specialist and noticed that people were much less cautious about rules with empty oil drums than full ones despite them being more dangerous due to the vapours. Therefore he hypothesised that concepts in language determine cognition and behaviour.- “empty”
Contrast a weaker version of this hypothesis with a stronger one
Linguistic Relativism- Language can influence (but doesn’t determine) how we think
Linguistic determinism- Language determines thought; Some languages have no words for certain concepts therefore it will not be present in thought. It is the absolute difference.
What two language properties that differ between cultures were used for testing the Sapir-whorf hypothesis?
Words for colours- range anywhere from dark and light (then usually dark, light, red) to a wide range
Words for numbers- some languages very limited (one and many or 1,2,3) or infinite
Describe a set of studies which found evidence against the Sapir whorf hypothesis
The Dani (New Guinea) have two color terms. Dani subjects have no problem to distinguish colors that they cannot name. Just like Western subjects Dani subjects were better at remembering focal colours than non-focal colours
Berlin and Kay (1969): Despite the fact that the amount of colour terms varies with language, there is a constant underlying hierarchy. Indicates that perception shapes language, not the other way around.
Hieder (1972) / Rosch (1973): Dani subjects (2 colour terms) were able to perceive and remember colours for which they have no words. Perception is not determined or influenced by language
Describe a study which found evidence against for Sapir whorf hypothesis
Greeks have a word for dark blue (ble) and light blue (ghalazio). They were given an oddball task to detect the square among circles, some would be a deviant colour- a light or dark version. An ERP measurement was then taken to investigate the Mismatch negativity (MMN) ERP component- i.e are these perceptually different for greek/ English speaking people. this is an ERP component for automatic, pre-attentive change-detection.
The study found that there was, as expected, an MMN found for any deviance. However while MMN was around the same for light green and light blue violations for English speaking participants, the violations in the ‘colour blue’ was much stronger in greek speaking populations.
They concluded that having a separate word/ concept for a colour makes it more deviant in this manner therefore evidence for the weak Sapir Whorf hypothesis.
Retracting a bit, but name an influential early model of speech production
Levelt’s model of speech production
Look in copy
Which part of Levelt’s model does the Sapir whorf hypothesis concern?
There conceptual preparation in terms of lexical concept producing and lexical concept
What is the next process concerned with in Levelt’s model? describe it
Selecting the right word from memory is a 2-stage process in Levelt’s model:
Lexical selection = lemma (information on synactic and semantic properties) =>
Morphological encoding = morpheme/ lexeme (Information about phonetic properties) =>
Describe a study using images which demonstrates the need for these two separate layers
Word frequency was used- some words in English are more often encountered (he, she, can, will) than others (atone, regale, lechary). High frequency words are recalled more easily
However Wingfield found that in a task where participants had to match a word to a picture there was no effect of frequency (spoon/ spatula).
This suggests that at the level of matching a word to a picture (not having too generate it) lexeme extraction does not take place- this occurs at the level of pronunciation.
Describe a study using a literary technique which demonstrates the differences between lexemes and lemmas
A task was given where participants had to translate dutch words into English words. There were three stimuli:
Low frequency lemma, lexeme has a high frequency homophone (leer= leather, learn)
Low frequency lemma and lexeme (No homophone) (fracture)
High frequency lemma and lexeme (No homophone) (corner)
Homophones conceptually have two lemmas for one lexeme if at two different levels.
If linguistic information is combined in one package that included both sound form and meaning then frequency of actual target word is relevant (leather), frequency of homophone (learn) is not: therefore leather and fracture will be slow, corner will be fast
If linguistic information is also represented at the lexeme level, frequency of the homophone will also play a role: therefore leather would also be fast because of its fast homophone in learn, the two controls would remain the same.
Describe the results of the study using phonemes which demonstrates the differences between lexemes and lemmas
As expected, the low frequency control was slower than the high frequency control. However, low frequency words with a high frequency homophone were fast, indicating that connections between words at the phonetic (lexeme) level influence language production.
Describe the methods of a study which investigated which stage (lexeme/ lemma) came first
Used a picture-word interference task: people have to identify a picture (screw) vocally while hearing a distractor word in their ear which is related at the semantic (lemma) level (bolt), at the phonological (lexeme) level (shrew) or an unrelated distractor (tart). In addition to this, various stimulus onset asynchronies (OAS) of the distractor were manipulated:
Word before image (-150ms)
Word and image at the same time (0ms)
Word after image (150ms)
Response times in producing the correct word were recorded.
Describe how the model would predict the results of the study which investigated which stage (lexeme/ lemma) came first
The model shows the lemma (image- concept) coming before the lexeme (the noise)
This therefore predicts that hearing the unrelated lexeme (tart) shouldn’t be a too problem when hearing it while seeing the lemma- at least no worse than if presented when reporting the lexeme (no effect of order.)
It would also predict that hearing a semantically related word (bolt) while being presented the image would interfere with the lexical access and therefore be slower. However if it was presented at the lexeme stage, it shouldn’t make much of a difference compared to an unrelated word.
It would predict that hearing a phonologically related word (shrew) when presenting the image shouldn’t fuck up lexical access too much but would actually help when presented while trying to receive the lexeme (known from previous research.)
Semantic distractors should have an early effect while phonological distractors should have a late effect.