Semantic Memory Flashcards
What does semantic memory refer to?
Sometimes our memories do not refer to specific events but are more encyclopedic. This general knowledge is semantic memory.
How does the effect of priming demonstrate a salient characteristic of the semantic memory?
A salient characteristic of semantic memory is its organized and regular structure. Remembering one concept brings related memories closer to awareness. This facilitation of related ideas is priming
How is semantic memory structured? i.e what is it based on
Semantic memory is structured based on shared aspects of meaning metaphorically stored closer together. Because they are more activated, if there is then a need to use them they are now closer to conscious awareness and can be used more readily.
What task are people typically given in a priming study?
A lexical decision task. That is, they are given strings of letters and asked to indicate whether they are words. In these studies, there are pairs of words: a critical item, called a prime, is followed by a target. What is of interest is how fast people respond to the target (such as by pressing a button).
How quickly is priming observed in ERP recordings? Why?
Priming is even observed in ERP recordings as early as 250 ms after the target word is presented. This is because it is easier for the brain to activate that information, so it doesn’t need to work as hard.
Functionally, why does semantic priming occur? (2)
Semantic priming occurs because concepts are not understood in isolation but in terms of how they relate to each other. By activating related concepts, people bring to bear a larger set of knowledge to help them understand and think.
Priming also helps people detect inconsistencies. When people encounter semantically anomalous information, such as hearing the sentence “the doctor listened with his carrot,” ERP recordings show an increased electrical negativity around 400 ms after first seeing it.
What is meant by mediated priming?
When retrieving the concept “lion” it is likely that the concept “tiger” is activated because these are both large, predatory cats. If “tiger” is primed, are concepts related to it also activated, such as “stripes”? This would be mediated priming because the connection between “lion” and “stripes” is mediated by “tiger.”
Does mediated priming actually occur when studied?
In general, mediated priming does occur, as shown by using both response times and ERP recordings. However, mediated priming is more fragile than direct priming. Its priming is smaller in magnitude and it is sometimes not observed
What is the fan effect and how does it relate to the semantic memory?
In episodic memory, increased numbers of associations with a concept can slow down retrieval time, as in the fan effect. Semantic memory is made up of very large numbers of associations among concepts. This interconnectivity can be thought of as a complex network of concepts and associations.
And so, based on the fan effect, one would expect that it should be difficult to retrieve semantic information. However, the opposite is true. Specifically, concepts in semantic memory that have more interconnections are retrieved faster
Why is this different pattern of results regarding the fan effect associated observed?
In semantic memory these associations provide both direct and indirect connections among concepts. Two concepts might be directly associated but also share a number of intermediate concepts, which functionally increases the number of retrieval pathways between them. As a result, there are many ways that concepts can prime one another.
How is inhibition related to semantic memory?
Like episodic memory, inhibition can be used to help narrow a memory search to the appropriate part of semantic memory.
During retrieval, related concepts may be inhibited. For example, people retrieve the concept “salmon” for the category FISH more slowly if they had recently retrieved several other examples of fish.
How long does the conversion of episodic to semantic memory take and how may it be accelerated?
Information requires a great deal of time to move from episodic to semantic memory. For example, in a study by Dagenbach, Horst, and Carr (1990), students at Millersville University did not show
significant priming of newly learned words until after five weeks of practice. Thus, the conversion of knowledge from episodic to semantic memory can be a long process. That said, this process can be accelerated if new learning is done in many different contexts or settings rather than just one
When people process concepts through the semantic memory, do they tend to rely on more associative (what words tend to occur together) or similarity information?
For semantic memory, when people process abstract concepts (e.g., barrier) they tend to rely more on associative information (what words tend to occur together), but when they are concrete concepts (e.g., mushroom) people rely more on similarity information
That said, it may be the case that even abstract concepts have an embodied element. Concepts such as horror and beauty have an associated emotional element, and the bodily experience of the emotion may be tied, in some way, to some abstract concepts
Describe a study which demonstrates that semantic knowledge is influenced by how we physically interact with the world
Pecher, Zeelenberg, and Barsalou (2003) gave students a property identification task in which they were shown pairs of words, such as “BLENDER–loud.” The task was to indicate whether the second word was a property of the first. Students were faster when the property was from the same sensory modality as the previous trial. For example, people were faster to respond to “BLENDER– loud” if it immediately followed “LEAVES–rustling” (which also involves sound) than if it followed “CRANBERRIES–tart” (which involves the sense of taste).
What is the purpose of categorisation?
The process of categorization allows us to draw on prior experience in a regular and reliable fashion in new situations. We can assume that some of the elements of the new situation will be like those that were observed previously. (e.g dog)
What are the three levels of categorisation?
basic- The one at which we operate at most often. It is at this level that categories are defined by features that provide enough detail to allow us to treat different members as similar but without providing more detail than is often necessary (saw, dog, chair, drum).
subordinate- Provides detailed information about more specific portions of a basic category. (camping saw, miniature poodle, leather recliner, and kettle drum)
Superordinate- very general information that captures a wide range of basic-level categories ( tool, pet, furniture, and musical instrument)
How does retrieval speed differ between these categories? (3)
In general, basic-level category information is retrieved better than the other two. People can retrieve more attributes for basic level categories and are able to retrieve the names of basic- level categories faster than the others. This suggests that the basic level has some primacy in semantic memory.
Categories have many members. Describe three ways in which their combined influence may manifest themself
First, categories exhibit a central tendency, or averaged category ideal.
Second, categories have graded membership. Some members are thought of as being better members of the category than others (e.g robin vs penguin).
Finally, members of a category might not be defined by a single set of features. Different features may be shared among several category instances. This is called family resemblance.
Describe an important distinction between two classes of categories. Why is a distinction made here?
Artifact categories (things that people make) and natural kind categories (things that are found in nature). These category classes are served by different brain regions.
First, like most semantic memories, the left hemisphere tends to be more involved than the right. Natural kinds, such as animals, tend to involve more of the medial fusiform gyrus (BA 37) and superior temporal gyrus (BA 41).
In comparison, artifacts involve more of the lateral fusiform gyrus (BA 37) and the posterior middle temporal gyrus (BA 21), near brain regions important for verbs and action
Describe two other differences between these classes of categorisation
While both classes of categories show graded membership, this is more evident in artifact categories. This is because people have more certainty about natural kinds (e.g., what makes something a bird), and have more ambiguity about artifacts (e.g., what makes something a tool).
Also, people make perceptual decisions faster when comparing objects from natural kind categories (what something looks like tells you what it is) but make manipulability (how you use it) decisions faster when comparing objects from artifact categories
What is the classical view of categorisation?
The idea that categories are defined by necessary and sufficient features is the classical view of categorization. They are necessary in that those features must be present and they are sufficient in that, as long as they are present, something is a member of a category.
Describe a study providing evidence for the classical view of categorisation
A study by Bruner, Goodnow, and Austin provided support for the classical view. In this study, people were shown figures where items can be identified along four dimensions: the type of objects, their number, their color, and the number of borders. When people are given subsets of items, along with an indication of whether each one is a member of a category, people can derive the category rules.
How is this classical view limited in its explanations?
The classical view cannot explain central tendency, graded membership, and family resemblance.
Part of this rests on the fact that the brain does not work on the either/or principles of a digital computer. Instead, it makes judgments based on loose and shifting collections of cell assemblies, giving the judgments it produces a fuzzier quality
How can elements, features, or properties that define category members can vary in their importance?
Rarer features are more diagnostic than common features in defining a category. For example, “has a trunk” is more defining of an elephant than is “breathes,” although both are needed.