Sociology Of Personal Life, The Traditional Family And The Changing Life Course Sociologists Flashcards
Allan and Crow
Life course
In the 20th century up until 1960s there was a fairly standard life course for most individuals within the institution of marriage.
When children left home they had more time for leisure/ time with grandchildren
Levin
Life course
Life course was compulsory as there were strong social norms prescribing that this was the way to live.
Family unit took on the socially accepted format of the ‘cereal packet family’
Allan and Crow and Levin
Life course
Since late 1960s and early 1970s major changes in peoples lives and huge chances in personal relationships and forms of family and households.
Post modernist - Lewis
Typical family
Individuals have greater freedom to choose their behaviour rather than being regulated by an externally imposed public moral code.
There is no longer such thing as the ‘typical family.’
May
Personal relationships
Personal relationships are so diverse both in the family and beyond it that it would be more appropriate to study the sociology of personal life rather than families which are no longer at the centre of very many peoples lives and relationships.
Chambers
The individualisation thesis
Individualisation has been a central explanation for key changes in ideas about love, commitment family decline and for the development of new kinds of personal relationship.
Beck-Gernsheim
Individualisation thesis
Describes individualisation as the process whereby traditional social relationships, bonds, customs, values and beliefs used to strongly regulate peoples lives have been losing more meaning and influence.
Gabb
Relationships
Relationships outside the family can affect relationships in the family
Baumann
Individualisation thesis
The world of growing individualisation and change, kinship networks are frail and human bonds are weak.
People are searching for security.
Leading to growth in a wide diversity of family and personal living arrangement.
Focus has moved from the family to the individual.
Beck-Gernsheim 2
Individualisation thesis
The underlying cause of this individualisation is a modern medicine e.g. contraception and artificial insemination which enables sexuality and reproduction to be separated from each other.
Beck-Gernsheim 3
individualisation thesis
Suggests that it’s no longer clear who is part of the family as there is no longer talk of husbands and wives, parenthood and family names.
Beck-Gernsheim
Confluent love
Points out that growing individualisation that love rather than economic necessity guides people approaches relationships.
Argues love is changing away from ‘romantic love’ to ‘until the next best thing’ (confluent love).
Giddens
Confluent love and pure relationships
Individuals choose to stay together to meet their emotional and sexual needs.
Chambers
Confluent love and pure relationships
Relationships aren’t necessarily permanent and don’t involve long term commitment and stability enforced by external pressures such as demands of parents and wider kin established by social traditions.
Giddens
Marriage
People marry for the sake of love, divorce for the sake of love and engage in an endless cycle of hoping, regretting and trying again
Giddens
Same sex couples
Sees same sex couples as leading the way producing more democratic and equal relationships
Weston
Same sex couples
Found same sex couples created supportive families of choice from among friends, lovers and biological kin.
Smart
Individualisation thesis
Individualisation exaggerates the extent of family decline.
People’s lives and family ties still involve strong social and emotional bonds and connections.
People haven’t been cut free from external social rules and pressures - they are still influenced by factors such as social class, gender, ethnicity.
The view of contemporary life presented in individualisation theory isn’t based on any research into contemporary family life and doesn’t match life experiences of he majority of families or the experiences of family life shown in sociological studies
Chambers
criticisms of theories of individualisation, Confluent love and pure relationships
Agrees with Smart that aspects of traditional life haven’t declined.
Just because the cereal packet family has declined doesn’t mean people are free to do whatever they want, most people are committed to the values surrounding their conduct passed down by their culture, history, parents and communities.
Chambers and Smart
Criticisms of individualisation thesis
Individualisation only fits a small group of white heterosexual middle class and some same sex couples and ignores social class and ethnic differences and in some same sex relationships there is continuing fears of public hostility in some communities.
Beck
Changing families, households and personal lives - uncertainty and choice
The growth of the ‘negotiated family’ which doesn’t conform to traditional norms but varys according to wishes and expectations of members
Smart
Connectedness thesis
We are fundamentally social beings whose choice is always made within a web of connectedness.