Sociology And Science - done Flashcards
positivism
positivists believe they can apply logical methods of the natural society to explain society - this knowledge will be true and objective as its sceintific- reality exists independently outside of the human mind
positivism on patterns laws and inductive reasoning
reality has patterns and is random. Durkheim - real laws can explain these patterns done thru induction - gathering data through careful observation and measurment. once enough data is gathered we can form a general law (verificationism) - these laws can predict future events
positivism and objective quantitative research
pos use quantitative data to uncover and measure patterns of behavior - mathematical precise statements about their research. researchers should be detached and objective, since water boiling is effected by scientists feeling neither should the researcher on the people
Durkheim and suicide
used OS to research suicide determined that it is not the result of motives but of social facts acting on other social facts. protestants killed themselves more than Catholics as catholicism was more successful in the integration of individuals
interpretivism
society should not model itself on natural science - unsuited to studying human beings, we should abandon detachment and objectivity - we must put ourself in the place of the actor
- favour participant obs, personal documents, unstru interv
interpretivism and the subject matter of sociology
natural science studies matter which has no conscious and sociology does the opposite as people have free will. Mead says we choose how to respond to external stimuli rather than automatically responding - humans are not puppets on a string but construct society through meanings they give
types of interpretivism - interactionalist
interactionists - we can have casual explanations - Glaser and strauss are against using hypoythesis as it may influence our view of what’s important, instead favour bottom up approach which is when our ideas emerge as we go along
karl popper
falsificationism
criticisms and the open society
falsification
a good theory is falsifiable but when tested stands up to all attempts to disprove it, it is bold in the sense that it makes large generalisations that predict precisely big amounts of events or cases
criticisms and the open society
for a theory to be falsifiable it must be open to critisims - sciene is a public activity - this is so flaws can be fixed rapidly and make the theory better - favoured in open societies where opinions matter unlike closed ones