Sociocultural Paper 1 SAQs Flashcards
The individual & the group Ethics Study
Steele & Aronson 90s
The individual & the group Method Study
Tajfel 70s
Social cognitive theory Study
Odden & Rochat 2000s
Social identity theory Study
Tajfel 70s
Stereotypes Study
Steele & Aronson 90s
Influence of culture on behaviour & cognition Study
Berry 60s
Cultural dimensions Study
Berry 60s
Cultural influences on individual behaviour Ethics Study
Lyons-Padilla 2010s
Cultural influences on individual behaviour Method Study
Lyons-Padilla 2010s
Enculturation Study
Odden & Rochat 2000s
Acculturation Study
Lyons-Padilla 2010s
Steele & Aronson 90s Ethical Considerations
Steele & Aronson 90s Stereotypes Study
Theory
- Stereotypes are generalisations of characteristics associated with a groups of people.
- Stereotypes generate prejudice & discrimination against marginalised group.
- Stereotype threat posits internalization of stereotypes thus harming self-perception, & thus behaviour as a self-fulfilling prophecy occurs
Aim
- To investigate the effect of stereotype threat on the test performance of African Americans
- to investigate the result of prejudice within members of an out-group instead of typical inter-group prejudice
Participants/Research
- true
- over 100 black & white (comparison) students
- experimental condition: half of all participants were told they would complete a test which diagnosed intellectual ability (inducing stereotype threat for the black participants in this group)
- control condition: rest were told the test was a neutral exercise
Method
- participants completed test
- performance on test was analysed and compared
Results
- black participants performed worse than white participants in stereotype threat condition
- black and white participants performed the same in neutral/control condition
Implications
- black participants may have internalised racial stereotypes about negative academic performance, and thus felt negative self-perception causing them to fulfill this stereotype
Tajfel 70s Methodology
Tajfel 70s Social identity theory Study
Theory
- Social identity theory posits individuals identify with being apart of social groups leading to social categorization—individuals distinguishing themselves by their in-group, against an out-group
- also leads to positive distinctiveness where individuals desire positive social identity tend to see their in-group’s characteristics as positive causing in-group favouritism, often combined with social comparison where an individual then compares their positive in-group traits to negative ones of an out-group often generating stereotypes if the in-group is dominant, and prejudice against the out-group then even discrimination
Aim
- investigate the development of social group identity after arbitrary placement into groups and its influence on out-group prejudice
Participants/Research
- true
- over 60 boys (14-15 y/o)
Method
- participants were asked to estimate the number of dots within an area, & were placed into groups based on whether they overestimated or underestimated the no. Dots
- each participant was tested by asking to reward certain amount of money to their in-group which was connected to a certain about of money to the out-group
- these options were shown in matrices with 2 main conclusions
(1) most in-group profit, w/ more money given to out-group
(2) maximum difference between in & out group’s profit, however, this was the lowest possible amount in-group would receive
Results
- the boys would consistently choose option 2, giving the least money to their in-group, to disadvantage out-group at any cost
Implications
- even when there is no reason for out-group discrimination, people are still inclined to in-group favouritism, as social group identity is formed
- provides evidence for social group identity theory