Socio cultural studies Flashcards

1
Q

Study for SIT

A

Sherif 1954
Drury et el 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tajfel aim

A

to investigate if intergroup discrimination would take place based on being put into different groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Tajfel sample

A

48 British school boys (14-15)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tajfel method

A
  1. rate 12 paintings by Klee and Kandinsky
  2. randomly put into 2 groups but told they preferred either Klee or Kandinsky
  3. award points to 2 other boys, one from same group one not
    - if high value chosen for in = higher profit to the out-group
    - if mid-range value chosen = same points to out group
    - if low value chosen = only 1 point to out group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tajfel results

A

The boys were willing to give their own team fewer points to maximise the difference even if it meant they left with fewer points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tajfel conclusion

A

There is a natural tendency of members of a group to favour their in-group even in minimal groups without competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tajfel strenghts

A
  • high level of control. Confounding variables were minimised.
  • replicated = reliable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tajfel limitations

A
  • highly artificial = lacks ecological validity
  • may have shown demand characteristics, trying to please the researcher
  • may have interpreted the task as competitive and tried to win
  • sampling bias
  • use of deception = unethical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Abrams aim

A

to determine if in-group identity would affect one’s willingness to conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Abrams sample

A

50 undergraduate students (23 males and 27 females) enrolled in an introductory psychology course

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Abrams method

A
  1. Confederates introduced as either psychology students (in-group) or ancient history students (out-group)
  2. Asch paradigm - shown 9 lines and one to the side, one of the 9 lines same length as the one on the side
  3. 18 trials, 9 confederates gave correct, 9 gave incorrect
  4. In private condition participant was asked to write down everyone’s including their own so no one else saw
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Abrams results

A
  • 77% conformed at least 1 trial
  • most conformed in group public, then private then out group private then public
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Abrams conclusion

A
  • social categorisation can play a key role in one’s decision to conform publicly
  • overall conformity levels are about the same as Asch’s original
  • public conformity exceeded the usual level in the in-group condition but was far below normal in the out-group condition as tend to exaggerate the difference between us and the out-group
  • Thus, in this experiment, in-group members may be seen as more correct, while out-group members are seen as less likely to be correct when participants are made conscious of their group membership
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Abrams strenghts

A
  • high level of control
  • replicable = reliable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Abrams limitations

A
  • Culturally biased
  • Deception
  • Highly artificial = low ecological validity
  • Only uni students
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fagot aim

A

to determine the role that parents may play in gender-role development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Fagot sample

A
  • 24 families (12 with a boy and 12 with a girl)
  • Each only child between 20 and 24 months
  • Both parents lived at home and 20 - 30 years old
  • All white
  • varied in income
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Fagot method

A
  1. observation checklist of 46 child behaviours and 19 reactions by parents
  2. 5 60-minute observations completed for each family over 5 weeks
    time sampling, making note of behaviour every 60 seconds
  3. each parent was asked to rate the 46 behaviours as more appropriate for girls, for boys, or neutral and also filled out a questionnaire on the socialisation of sex roles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Fagot results

A
  • Boys were more likely to be left alone
  • boys more positive responses when they played with blocks
  • girls more negative responses when they manipulated an object
  • More positive responses to girls than boys for playing with dolls
  • criticised girls more when they participated in activities like running and jumping
  • more positive responses to girls when they asked for help
  • Fathers were more concerned with appropriate sex-typing
  • both parents found more behaviours appropriate for girls only than for boys only
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Fagot conclusion

A
  • Parents reacted more favourably to the child when the child was engaged in same-sex preferred behaviour
  • more likely to receive negative responses to cross-sex-preferred behaviours
  • Parents gave girls more positive responses when they engaged in adult-oriented, dependent behaviour
  • On the questionnaire, parents did not see asking for help as a sex-preferred behaviour; however, they were more likely to act positively toward a girl than a boy asking for help = not fully aware
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Fagot strenghts

A
  • Naturalistic = high ecological validity.
  • two observers = not influenced by personal biases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Fagot limitations

A
  • Culturally biased
  • Deception
  • Highly artificial = low ecological validity
  • Only uni students
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

2 studies for cultural groups and influences on behaviour

A

Berry 1967
Kearins 1981

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Berry aim

A
  • based on earlier research by Barry, Child, and Bacon (1959) which suggested that hunting and fishing societies tend to be individualistic, whereas agricultural societies tend to be collectivistic
  • aim of measuring the level of conformity in these two types of societies by applying a version of the Asch Paradigm.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Berry sample

A
  • Temne of Sierra Leone = rice farming.
    Inuit people of Baffin Island, Canada, = hunting and fishing
  • made up of people who maintained the traditional way of life and people who either had a Western education or Western employment
  • Scots as a reference group - both urban and rural Scots
  • approximately 120 participants in each group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Berry method

A
  1. Each individual was brought into a room by him or herself
  2. given a set of nine lines
  3. 2 practice tests
  4. on 3rd “Most Temne (or Inuit or Scottish) people say this line is equal in length to the one at the top” and correct answer given
  5. trials 4 - 6, the wrong response was given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Berry results

A
  • Temne (collectivistic) much higher rate of conformity
  • Inuits even lower rate of conformity than Scots
  • no significant difference if the participants were living the traditional life or were highly exposed to Western culture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Berry strengths

A
  • The directions were given in their own language by a native interpreter
  • control condition to strengthen the internal validity of the study
  • highly replicable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Berry limitations

A
  • lacks ecological validity
  • Quasi-experiment = causality cannot be determined
  • questions of temporal validity, more globalised world = more access to media could be different
  • ecological fallacy = lead to stereotyping about cultural groups
30
Q

2 studies for the impacts of globalisation

A

Norasakkunit and uchida 2014
Chui

31
Q

aim of norasakkunit and uchida

A

applied Berry & Sam’s acculturation model to explain the origins of hikikomori

32
Q

norasakkunit and uchida sample

A

195 Japanese uni students

33
Q

norasakkunit and uchida method

A

3 tests:
1. standardised test to see whether high risk or low risk for hikikomori
2. measure attitudes about social harmony and conformity, looked at three levels: perception of their current self, ideal self, Japanese society
3. measure local identity (high social harmony and collectivism) and global identity (high individualism and achievement)

34
Q

norasakkunit and uchida results

A
  • both groups agreed social harmony and conformity highly valued by Japanese society
  • high risk ranked social harmony values much lower than the low-risk students
  • high-risk scored lower than low-risk on local identity and global identity
35
Q

norasakkunit and uchida conclusion

A

local culture may alienate many Japanese youths who decide not to conform to the cultural norms but can’t access the globalised culture so they withdraw from society

36
Q

norasakkunit and uchida strengths

A

Large sample

37
Q

norasakkunit and uchida weaknesses

A
  • correlation study = no cause and effect determined
  • Biased sample = not generalisable
  • Analogous approach = students don’t actually have hikikomori
  • Data self reported = demand characteristics
  • Doesn’t explain why mainly in japan and not in other marginalised groups world wide
38
Q

Gries et al sample

A

2684 university students & staff in the US

39
Q

Gries et al aim

A

To investigate the effect of interpersonal contact, media exposure to, & knowledge on China on American views towards China

40
Q

Gries et al method

A

2 large surveys to see whether there was a relationship between knowledge about China, prejudice against the Chinese, & preference for US/China government policy

41
Q

Gries et al results

A

greater knowledge of China was actually associated with greater negativity towards China and a desire for tougher China policies

42
Q

Gries et al conclusion

A

contact with another group through media exposure actually caused more negative reactions

43
Q

Gries et al strengths

A
  • Large sample: high generalizability
  • Surveys are replicable = increased reliability
44
Q

gries et al limitations

A
  • Correlational so does not establish a cause & effect relationship
  • self reported data
45
Q

2 studies for SCT

A

Bandura 1961
Joy, Kimball & Zabrack 1986

46
Q

2 studies for stereotype formation

A

Harris and Fiske 2006
Fein and Spencer 1997

47
Q

2 studies for the effect of stereotypes

A

Steele and Aronson 1995
Payne 2001

48
Q

2 studies for research methods into the group and the individual

A

Sherif 1954 - field experiment
Bandura 1961 - true experiment

49
Q

2 studies for ethical considerations into the group and the individual

A

Sherif 1954
Bandura 1961

50
Q

2 studies for cultural dimensions

A

Chen et al 2005
Berry 1967

51
Q

2 studies for research methods into cultural origins of behaviour and cognition

A

Berry 1967 - quasi
Kearins 1981 - quasi

52
Q

2 studies for ethical considerations when investigating cultural origins of behaviour and cognition

A

Berry 1967
Kearins 1981

53
Q

2 studies for enculturation

A

Greensfield 1969
Fagot 1978

54
Q

2 studies for acculturation

A

Lueck & Wilson 2010
Wang et al 2010

55
Q

2 studies for research methods into cultural influences on individual behaviour

A

Lueck & Wilson 2010 - semi structured interview
Fagot 1978 - observation

56
Q

2 studies for ethical considerations into cultural influences on individual behaviour

A

Fagot 1978
Lueck & Wilson 2010

57
Q

Sherif 1954 aim

A
  • to study whether a conflict between groups could be diminished if they worked together on a superordinate goal.
  • Predicts that:
  • positively independent groups - work towards common goals - will have good intergroup relations
  • negatively independent groups - compete for scarce resources - will create conflict and ethnocentric attitudes
58
Q

Sherif 1954 sample

A
  • 22 boys - aged 11-12, white, middle class, protestant, Oklahoma
  • None of them knew each other
  • Didn’t know they were taking part
59
Q

Sherif 1954 method

A
  • Split into two random groups
  • Picked up in different buses
  • Bonding stage = create group identity
  • Conflict through games eg. tug of war with prizes and eating others food if they got there first
  • Created limited resources
  • Hostility between groups eg. setting flags on fire, raiding cabins, physical fights etc
  • Boys asked to list features of their group and the other
  • Reducing tensions with common goal eg. food truck “breaking down” and the boys had to work together to pull it
60
Q

Sherif 1954 results

A

Showed they called in group favourable terms and out group unfavourable

61
Q

Sherif 1954 conclusion

A

Showed how conflict between groups arises and how it may be solved

62
Q

Sherif 1954 strengths

A
  • Field experiment = high ecological validity
  • Also very controlled for field experiment
63
Q

Sherif 1954 limitations

A
  • Could not observe boys at all times eg. at night or more private conversations
  • Could show demand characteristics
  • Ethical consideration - signs of emotional distress eg. bedwetting and running away
  • Also no consent from boys
  • Sample bias - only young american boys = not generalisable
64
Q

Drury et al 2009 aim

A

used virtual reality to investigate the role of SIT in helping

65
Q

Drury et al 2009 sample

A
  • 40 students from University of Sussex
  • 20 to 25 years
  • 7 participants were male - the rest was female
66
Q

Drury et al 2009 method

A
  • VR simulator to experience an emergency in London metro - escape a fire
  • could help people or push them out of their way
  • Before starting the participants asked to read a news report about a fire in the King Cross metro where 31 people died
  • either told:
    “You have just been to an England football match… You and the other England supporters are making your way through the local rail station”
  • Or:
    “You have spent a long day shopping in central London and are now on the way back”
  • rest is the same
  • “people” in the VR simulation wore same shirts to make social group identity salient
  • one condition there was a small crowd (8 other people)
  • other was larger (32 other people)
67
Q

Drury et al 2009 results

A
  • participants with a high in-group identification gave more help and pushed others less than did those who did not have in-group identification
  • Crowd size did not affect the amount of help given
68
Q

Drury et al 2009 strengths

A
  • mundane realism
  • Internal validity
  • Applicable
69
Q

Drury et al 2009 limitations

A
  • Culturally biased
  • Only uni students
70
Q
A