Biological studies Flashcards
Study for technology used to study the brain and neurotransmission
Passamonti et al 2012
Passamonti et al aim
To investigate whether lowering serotonin alters dynamic interplay between PFC and amygdala
Passamonti et al sample
30 healthy volunteers
Passamonti et al method
- 2 conditions - serotonin depletion vs placebo
- Both group consumed drinks but one in serotonin depletion group lacked tryptophan (an amino acid needed to produce serotonin)
- Put through fMRI machine
- Measured brain responses to angry, neutral and sad faces
- Repeated next week
Passamonti et al results
Reduced activity in frontal lobe during low serotonin conditions when viewing angry faces
Passamonti et al conclusion
- If someone threatened and they have low serotonin might not be able to perform top-down control
- Lack of activity in PFC may affect ability to regulate stress response triggered by amygdala and increase emotional reaction
Passamonti et al strengths
- Randomised sample
- Double blind
Passamonti et al limitations
- did showing faces actually activate amygdala?
- serotonin levels weren’t measured so can we be sure that the people in the condition had less serotonin or that the drink had an effect
- Lacked ecological validity
study for localisation of function
Draganski et al 2004
Draganski et al aim
to see whether learning a new skill (juggling) would affect the brains of participants
Draganski et al sample
- 24 volunteers (ages 20 - 24)
- 21 f, 3 m
- Non-jugglers
Draganski et al method
- MRI scan at the start of the study to serve as base rate for grey matter and brain structure
- 1 of 2 conditions - jugglers and non-jugglers (control)
- in juggling condition taught three-ball juggling
- asked to practise this and notify when mastered
- jugglers 2nd scan
- told not to juggle anymore and scan three months later
Draganski et al results
- VBM used to see if significant differences in neural density (grey matter)
- no significant differences in the grey matter between the two conditions before study
- at end of first part jugglers had significantly larger amount of grey matter in mid-temporal area in both hemispheres - associated with visual memory
- Three months after (many couldn’t juggle anymore) amount of grey matter in these parts decreased
- no change in non-juggling
Draganski et al conclusion
- juggling relies more on visual memory (perception and spatial anticipation of moving objects) rather than procedural memory (would be change in the cerebellum or basal ganglia)
- Shows evidence of neural pruning
Draganski et al strengths
- pre-test/post-test design
- Experimental = cause-and-effect relationship
- Control group
Draganski et al limitations
- very small sample = may not be reliable
- field experiment = IV manipulated in natural conditions = internal validity (participants at home for a lot)
study for neuroplasticity
Draganski et al 2004
Study for Hormones
Zac 2009
study for evolutionary explanations for attraction
Clark and Hatfield 1978
study for neurotransmission
Rogers and Kesner 2003
Clark and Hatfield aim
Test parental investment theory
Clark and Hatfield sample
- 48 male participants + 48 female
- 5 female + 4 males asking from mildly unattractive to moderately attractive
- All students
- In florida
Clark and Hatfield method
- Approach a stranger on campus
- Say “I’ve been noticing you around campus. I find you very attractive”
- Would you go out with me tonight?
- Would you come to my apartment tonight?
- Would you go to bed with me tonight?
Clark and Hatfield results
Male asked female:
- Date - 56%
- Apartment - 6%
- Bed - 0%
Female asked male:
- Date - 50%
- Apartment - 69%
- Bed - 75%