Biological studies Flashcards

1
Q

Study for technology used to study the brain and neurotransmission

A

Passamonti et al 2012

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Passamonti et al aim

A

To investigate whether lowering serotonin alters dynamic interplay between PFC and amygdala

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Passamonti et al sample

A

30 healthy volunteers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Passamonti et al method

A
  • 2 conditions - serotonin depletion vs placebo
  • Both group consumed drinks but one in serotonin depletion group lacked tryptophan (an amino acid needed to produce serotonin)
  • Put through fMRI machine
  • Measured brain responses to angry, neutral and sad faces
  • Repeated next week
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Passamonti et al results

A

Reduced activity in frontal lobe during low serotonin conditions when viewing angry faces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Passamonti et al conclusion

A
  • If someone threatened and they have low serotonin might not be able to perform top-down control
  • Lack of activity in PFC may affect ability to regulate stress response triggered by amygdala and increase emotional reaction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Passamonti et al strengths

A
  • Randomised sample
  • Double blind
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Passamonti et al limitations

A
  • did showing faces actually activate amygdala?
  • serotonin levels weren’t measured so can we be sure that the people in the condition had less serotonin or that the drink had an effect
  • Lacked ecological validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

study for localisation of function

A

Draganski et al 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Draganski et al aim

A

to see whether learning a new skill (juggling) would affect the brains of participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Draganski et al sample

A
  • 24 volunteers (ages 20 - 24)
  • 21 f, 3 m
  • Non-jugglers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Draganski et al method

A
  • MRI scan at the start of the study to serve as base rate for grey matter and brain structure
  • 1 of 2 conditions - jugglers and non-jugglers (control)
  • in juggling condition taught three-ball juggling
  • asked to practise this and notify when mastered
  • jugglers 2nd scan
  • told not to juggle anymore and scan three months later
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Draganski et al results

A
  • VBM used to see if significant differences in neural density (grey matter)
  • no significant differences in the grey matter between the two conditions before study
  • at end of first part jugglers had significantly larger amount of grey matter in mid-temporal area in both hemispheres - associated with visual memory
  • Three months after (many couldn’t juggle anymore) amount of grey matter in these parts decreased
  • no change in non-juggling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Draganski et al conclusion

A
  • juggling relies more on visual memory (perception and spatial anticipation of moving objects) rather than procedural memory (would be change in the cerebellum or basal ganglia)
  • Shows evidence of neural pruning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Draganski et al strengths

A
  • pre-test/post-test design
  • Experimental = cause-and-effect relationship
  • Control group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Draganski et al limitations

A
  • very small sample = may not be reliable
  • field experiment = IV manipulated in natural conditions = internal validity (participants at home for a lot)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

study for neuroplasticity

A

Draganski et al 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Study for Hormones

A

Zac 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

study for evolutionary explanations for attraction

A

Clark and Hatfield 1978

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

study for neurotransmission

A

Rogers and Kesner 2003

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Clark and Hatfield aim

A

Test parental investment theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Clark and Hatfield sample

A
  • 48 male participants + 48 female
  • 5 female + 4 males asking from mildly unattractive to moderately attractive
  • All students
  • In florida
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Clark and Hatfield method

A
  • Approach a stranger on campus
  • Say “I’ve been noticing you around campus. I find you very attractive”
  • Would you go out with me tonight?
  • Would you come to my apartment tonight?
  • Would you go to bed with me tonight?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Clark and Hatfield results

A

Male asked female:
- Date - 56%
- Apartment - 6%
- Bed - 0%
Female asked male:
- Date - 50%
- Apartment - 69%
- Bed - 75%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Clark and Hatfield conclusion

A

Agrees with parental investment theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Clark and Hatfield strengths

A
  • 1982 and 2015 results the same so reliable
  • Field experiment so ecological validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Clark and Hatfield limitations

A
  • Ethical concerns as they were deceived
  • Could be because of social norms not the theory
  • Women might have more safety concerns about casual sex then men
  • Cultural bias
  • They were asked on weekdays at school so might not be the same in a club or smt
28
Q

A study for ethics in the relationship between brain and behaviour

A

Rogers and keener 2003

29
Q

A study for research methods in the relationship between brain and behaviour

A

Passamonti - true experiment

30
Q

Zac 2009 aim

A

To study the effect of testosterone on a male’s generosity and sense of aggression

31
Q

Zac 2009 sample

A

25 male students

32
Q

Zac 2009 method

A
  • Wanted to create “Alpha male”
    drew blood from the participants to establish baseline levels of testosterone
  • rub a gel on their shoulders - testosterone gel or a placebo
    next morning another blood test
    treatment doubled the amount of testosterone
  • Ultimatum Game
  • told could be generous with money or stingy
  • stingy offers could be rejected = both men to lose all the money
  • four weeks later repeated but other substance gel
33
Q

Zac 2009 results

A

27% stingier when they received the testosterone gel

34
Q

Zac 2009 conclusion

A
  • men with naturally high testosterone levels would be expected to be more selfish and also more likely to punish others for violations of social norms
  • testosterone has the opposite effect of oxytocin - a rise in distrust and an increase in selfish behavior
35
Q

Zac 2009 strengths

A
  • repeated measures design = no participant differences
  • After debriefing = showed participants whether they received testosterone or placebo
  • counterbalanced = order effects did not play a role in the results
36
Q

Zac 2009 limitations

A
  • Other social factors that could have had an effect
  • did not measure activity in the amygdala or hypothalamus
  • highly artificial = low ecological validity
    levels of testosterone artificially manipulated and game very simplistic so not real-life
37
Q

a study for pheromones

A

Wedekind 1972

38
Q

A study for research methods into hormones and pheromones and their effects on behaviour

39
Q

A study for ethical consideration into hormones and pheromones and their effects on behaviour

40
Q

A study for genes

A

Tiihonen 2014

41
Q

A study for genetic similarity

A

Tiihonen 2014

42
Q

A study for research methods into the relationship between genetics and behaviour

A

Clark and Hatfield

43
Q

A study for ethical considerations into the relationship between genetics and behaviour

A

Tiihonen 2014

44
Q

Tiihonen 2014 aim

A

To see if there is a correlation between the MAOA short gene and violent crimes

45
Q

Tiihonen 2014 sample

A

Almost 900 offenders in Finnish prison

46
Q

Tiihonen 2014 method

A
  • Interviewed then separated according to crimes into violent and non-violent
  • Recorded if experiences maltreatment as a child and drug abuse
47
Q

Tiihonen 2014 results

A
  • Those with gene 13x more likely to commit violent crime
  • Connection between genes and behaviour was strongest for the 78 in “extremely violent offender”
48
Q

Tiihonen 2014 conclusion

A

The combination of MAOA short gene and maltreatment as a child can lead to an increase in violent behaviour

49
Q

Tiihonen 2014 strengths

A
  • Some discluded because of psychosis
  • Large sample
50
Q

Tiihonen 2014 limiations

A
  • Not generalisable because of sample bias
  • Quasi experiment so doesn’t establish cause and effect relationship
51
Q

Saxton 2008 aim

A

To test effects of Androstadienone at a speed dating event in which men and women interact in a series of brief encounter

52
Q

Saxton 2008 theory

A

Androstadienone - found in predominantly male sweat - derivative of testosterone

53
Q

Saxton 2008 sample

A

Event 1 - uni students 19-25
Event 2+3 - private speed dating agency (30-41) (21-35)

54
Q

Saxton 2008 method

A

Field experiment
3 conditions on cotton wool
Androstadienone and 1% clove oil
Clove oil
Water
Under nose of female participants
Females rated males on attractiveness from 1-7

55
Q

Saxton 2008 results

A

In ⅔ females with Androstadienone rated males as more attractive than with just water and clove oil

56
Q

Saxton 2008 conclusion

A

Androstadienone is a possible pheromone given off in male sweat and acts as a chemical messenger to increase feelings of attraction in a female. It may act as a sexual signal giving information about male mate quality

57
Q

Saxton 2008 limitations

A
  • over-simplifies - ignoring cognitive and sociocultural factors
  • Biased sample
  • in real life deodorants and perfume used
  • Not very strong results - not conclusive
  • Participant variables
  • Don’t know is pheromones even exist in human
58
Q

Rogers and Kesner 2003 theory

A
  • In the hippocampus, there is a high concentration of acetylcholine receptor sites
  • acetylcholine is excitatory neurotransmitter and agonist
59
Q

Rogers and Kesner 2003 aim

A

To investigate the role of acetylcholine in spatial memory recall in the hippocampus

60
Q

Rogers and Kesner 2003 sample

61
Q

Rogers and Kesner 2003 method

A
  • One group given scopolamine injection (is antagonist and blocks acetylcholine) and other placebo into the hippocampus
  • Put in a maze they already knew and had to find food
62
Q

Rogers and Kesner 2003 results

A
  • Group with scopolamine took longer and made more mistakes
63
Q

Rogers and Kesner 2003 conclusion

A
  • Acetylcholine does play a role in memory in the hippocampus
64
Q

Rogers and Kesner 2003 strengths

A
  • True experiment = cause and effect relationship
  • Used placebo so wouldn’t just be adrenaline from injection having an effect
65
Q

Rogers and Kesner 2003 limitations

A
  • Memory is very complex and takes place in more area then just hippocampus
  • Not humans
  • ethics