Social Psychology Flashcards
Bibb Latané
Worked on bystander intervention
John Darley
Worked on bystander intervention
Helping behavior
Includes altruism and behaviors that may be motivated by egoism or selfishness
Altruism
Form of helping behavior in which the person’s intention is to benefit someone else at some cost to himself
Robert Zajonc
Worked on the mere exposure hypothesis. Social facilitation effect. Found that the presence of others helps with easy tasks but hinders complex tasks.
Prosocial behavior
Behavior that benefit other individuals or groups of people. There are two types: 1) altruism and 2) helping behavior
Mere exposure hypothesis
Mere repeated exposure to a stimulus leads to enhanced liking for it. The more you see something, the more you like it. Robert Zajonc has done research about this.
Spatial Proximity and propinquity
Plays a role in attraction. Even small differences have an effect. Possible explanations: 1) Potential friendships have a better opportunity to develop; 2) Increases the intensity of initial interactions.
The propinquity effect is the tendency for people to form friendships or romantic relationships with those whom they encounter often, forming a bond between subject and friend.
Attractiveness Stereotype
Tendency to attribute positive qualities and desirable characteristics to attractive people. Explains why physical attraction has been found a determinant of attraction.
Need complementarity
People choose relationships so that they mutually satisfy each other’s needs. The person who likes to talk is complemented by the person who likes to listen. Even successful complementary relationships have fundamental similarities in some attitudes that favor dissimilarity.
Equity theory
We consider not only our own costs and rewards, but the costs and rewards of the other person. people feel most comfortable in situations in which rewards and punishments are equal, fitting or highly logical.
Overbenefited people tend to feel guilty. Random or illogical punishment make people anxious.
If one person feels that inequity is present, there’ll be an instability.
Social Exchange theory
A person weighs the rewards and costs of interacting with another. More rewards lead to more attraction to the other. People attempt to maximize rewards and minimize costs.
Cognitive dissonance theory
Is the conflict you feel when your attitudes are not in synch with your behaviors.
Engaging in behavior that conflicts with an attitude may result in changing one’s attitude so that it is consistent with the behavior.
The greater the dissonance, the greater the pressure to reduce dissonance.
How can cognitive dissonance be reduced?
Dissonance can be reduced by changing dissonant elements or by adding consonant elements.
Which are the two types of dissonant situations?
1) free-choice dissonance
2) Forced-compliance dissonance
Which are the principles of cognitive dissonance theory?
1) If a person is pressured to say or do something contrary to his privately held attitudes, there will be a tendency for him to change his attitudes.
2) The greater the pressure to comply, the less the attitude change. Attitude change generally occurs when behavior is induced with a minimum of pressure.
Post-decisional dissonance
Dissonance that emerges after a choice. Festinger
Define Social Psychology
Concerned with social behavior including ways people influence each other’s attitudes and behavior: 1) impact of individuals on one another; 2) impact of social groups on individual group members; 3) impact of individual members on social groups; 4) impact of social groups on other social groups.
William McDougall
Psychologist - In 1908 published alone first textbook on social psychology.
E.H. Ross
Sociologist - In 1908 published alone first textbook on social psychology.
Verplank
1950’s suggested that social approval influenced behavior.
Found that the course of a conversation changes dramatically based upon the feedback (approval from others.
Helped to establish reinforcement theory.
Reinforcement theory
Behavior is motivated by anticipated rewards. Was challenged by social learning theorists.
Social learning theory
Behavior is learned through imitation. Also the most influential theory on aggression. Aggression is learned through modeling (direct observation), or through reinforcement.
Albert Bandura
main figure in social learning theory
Bindle
Developed the role theory in 1979
Role theory
People are aware of the social roles they are expected to fill, and much of their behavior can be attributed to adopting those roles.
Bystander Intervention
or bystander effect
John Darley & Bibb Latané.
March 1964 in New Gardens, New York, Kitty Genovese was stabbed to death in three separate attacks by the same man. The killing took mora than a half-hour. 38 witnessed the attack and heard her screams for help. Nobody called the police or took some action to stop the murder. This behavior was attributed to personality flaws of the witnesses. They didn’t help because of their problem-solving process and two situational factors (social influence and diffusion of responsibility)
The more bystanders nearby, the less likely anyone will help.
Attitudes
Keyston in the edifice of social psychology.
Typically expressed in opinion statements: likes or dislikes to people, things and ideas.
Components: 1) cognition or beliefs; 2) feelings; 3) behavioral predisposition.
A positive, negative, or neutral evaluation of a person, issue, or object.
Spreading of alternatives
The relative worth of 2 alternatives is spread apart. Accentuate positive things of chosen option and accentuate negative things of options that are not chosen. A mechanism to reduce dissonance. Festinger.
Free choice dissonance
When a person makes a choice between several desirable alternatives. A equally likes B and C. A chooses B. Therefore, there is dissonance since C is left out. Dissonance emerges after his choice –> post decisional dissonance. To reduce dissonance, spread alternatives.
Post-decisional dissonance
Dissonance that emerges after one’s choice.
Forced-compliance dissonance
When someone is forced into behaving in a way inconsistent with his attitudes. The force may come from either anticipated punishment or reward. Festinger.
Overjustification effect
If you reward people for something they already like doing, they may stop liking it. Once an activity is overjustified, there is a loss in the pleasure of doing it.
Self Perception Theory
Daryl Bem
To explain forced compliance dissonance.
When your attitudes are weak or ambiguous, you observe your own behavior and attribute an attitude to yourself.
People infer their attitudes upon observation of their own behavior.
According to this theory, there is not a state of discomfort or dissonance produced by behavior. A person’s initial attitude is irrelevant.
Consistency theories of attitude change
People prefer consistency and they will change or resist changing attitudes based upon this preference. If there is inconsistency (stimuli or irritants), the person will try to resolve it.
Which are theories of inconsistency?
1) Cognitive dissonance theory
2) Balance theory
Fritz Heider
Developer of the balance theory.
One of the founders of attribution theory. Divided attributions into two categories: dispositional and situational.
Balance theory
Balance exists when all three fit together. When there isn’t balance, there will be stress, and a tendency to remove this stress by achieving balance.
Balance: 1 or 3 positives
Unbalance: 0 or 2 positives
His original theory was modified since it was too simplistic.
Solution to unbalance: P changes attitude towards O. Or C changes attitudes towards P or O.
Sleeper effect
Over time, the persuasive impact of the high credibility source decreased while the persuasive effect of the low credibility source increased. Carl Hovland.
Two-sided message
Messages that contain arguments for and against a position are used for persuasion since they are balanced. Carl Hovland.
Carl Hovland’s persuasion model
Attitude change is a process of communicating a message with the intent to persuade someone.
Components of Carl Hovland’s persuasion model
1) Communicator: source, someone who has taken a position and intends to persuade someone to adopt his position. The more credibility is perceived, the greater the persuasive impact. Credibility depends on how expert and trustworthy a source appears to be.
Credibility increases by arguing against self-interest (i.e. criminals who argue for greater police)
2) Communication: message
3) Situation: surroundings
Carl Hovland & Walter Weiss Experiment
1952
Two sources: physicist Oppenheimer vs. Russian newspaper Pravda. opinions were measured before, immediately after and 4 weeks after. People were more persuaded by physicist.
William McGuire
Worked on the Analogy of inoculation and resistance to persuasion.
Inoculated people against attacks on cultural truisms by first presenting arguments against the truisms and then refuting the arguments. Cultural truisms that were not inoculated were quite susceptible to attack.
Analogy of inoculation
People can be inoculated against the attack of persuasive communications.
People can be psychologically inoculated against an oncoming attack by first exposing them to a weakened attack.
Refuted counterarguments
Presenting refuted counterarguments motivates people to practice defending their beliefs.
Cultural truisms
Beliefs that are seldom questioned. They are vulnerable to attack because the individual has never had practice defending them.
Reactance
When social pressure to behave in a particular way or to persuade someone is too hard. The person will choose to do or believe the exact opposite.
What determines when and with whom we affiliate?
Level of anxiety
Need to compare oneself with other people.
Belief perseverance
If you’re told to explain why a belief you hold is true and then you are told that this belief is false, you’ll tend to hold that belief. Lee Ross
List individual factors that influence attraction
1) Similarity
2) Need complementarity
3) Physical Attractiveness
4) Spatial proximity
5) Reciprocity
Credibility
The degree to which a person can be believed
Elaboration likehood model of persuasion
Petty & Cacciopo
There are two routes to persuasion:
1) CENTRAL ROUTE: the issue is very important to us. Strong arguments will persuade.
2) PERIPHERAL ROUTE: the issue is not very important to us, we cannot clearly hear the message or we are distracted. The strength of the persuader’s argument really doesn’t matter. What matters is how, by whom and in what surroundings the message is delivered.
Social comparison theory
We are drawn to affiliate because of a tendency to evaluate ourselves in relationship to other people.
What are the three principles of social comparison theory
1) People prefer to evaluate themselves by objective, non-social means. But when this is not possible, people evaluate their opinions and abilities by comparing them to those of other people.
2) The less the similarity of opinions and abilities between two people, the less the tendency to make these comparisons.
3) When there is a discrepancy; the tendency is to change one’s position so as to move in line with the group. The need to self-evaluation is linked to the need of affiliation.
Stanley Shachter
Found that greater anxiety leads to greater desire to affiliate. Discovered that anxious people prefer the company of other anxious people –> the perceived similarity of other anxious people is a factor in the affiliation.
Minimal justification effect
Also called insufficient justification effect.
Festinger
When external inducements (rewards or punishments) impact behavior, there is no need to change internal conditions.
When external inducements are minimal and they impact behavior, there is a dissonance that is reduced by changing internal conditions.
Festinger and Carlsmith experiment
1959
Extremely boring tasks for an hour, then they were asked to tell the next subject that the task was interesting and they were payed either $1 or $20 for that. Then, they were asked how boring the task was for them. Those who told the lie for $1 told the experimenters the task was more enjoyable than those who received $20.
The $1 people had dissonance and had to justify their lie and the fact that they lied for so little by thinking and saying that the task wasn’t boring.
Leon Festinger
Developer of the cognitive dissonance theory
Developer of the social comparison theory
Gain-Loss Principle
Aronson and Linder
An evaluation that changes will have more of an impact than an evaluation that remains constant.
We will like someone more if his like for us has increased. We will dislike someone more if his dislike for us has increased. Actually suggests that people prefer situations that start out negatively but end positvely, even over entirely positive events
Aronson & Linder
hypothesized the gain-loss principle
Reciprocity hypothesis
We tend to like people who indicate that they like us. We tend to dislike those who dislike us.
We don’t merely evaluate a person’s qualities and arrive at like or dislike. We take into account the other person’s evaluation of us.
Dynamogenesis theory
Developed by Norman Tripplet
The presence of competing others released energy in individuals that they could not release on their own.
Gustave Le Bon
Published his analysis of group behavior in 1895, considering the impact of other people on the individual.
He held that in crowds people are more emotional, less rational, more prone to extreme behaviors and easily stimulated by leaders from one kind of extreme feeling to another in short periods of time.
A person in a crowd, according to him, loses his/her individuality and becomes highly suggestible and with a lowered intellectual ability.
Floyd Allport
Coined the term social facilitation: the presence of others producing enhanced performance in individuals.
Social facilitation
the presence of others producing enhanced performance in individuals.
Norman Tripplet
1895 - Indiana University
Began his studies of how social forces affect bicycle racing. Considered the impact of people on the individual.
Made the first experiments in social psychology
Run the first social psychology type experiment on social facilitation - cyclists.
Latané and Darley social influence in bystander intervention experiment
Students in a room. Alone (control) and with two other people disguised as students. While students were completing a questionnaire in the room, smoke was entering the room (ambiguous event). The two experimenters disguised as students had to perceive the smoke and make sure that the real students noted how the noticed the smoke and still not do anything. Then, the student thought it was not an emergency. The result of the experiment led to coining and defining the term pluralistic ignorance
Pluralistic ignorance
Latané & Darley
leading others to a definition of an event as a nonemergency
When most of the people in a group privately disagree with X, but incorrectly believe that most people in the group agree with it
Latané and Darley diffusion of responsibility in bystander intervention experiment
Students were part of a discussion. A subject was placed in a room and told that the discussion would take place by intercom. Each person was allowed two minutes to speak. Other speeches were prerecorded. The subjects believed there were one, two or five other participants. One of the participants spoke about a tendency toward epileptic seizures and had one (prerecorded) in the middle of the discussion. Since the subject did not know what were other’s reactions, social influence was not present. 100% of the students who thought they were alone reported the seizure. When they thought there was another person listening, the percentage declined to 85%. With four more people, the seizure was reported only 62% of the time.
Diffusion of responsibility
Once an event is perceived to be an emergency, if there is inly one bystander, he has 100% responsibility to act and control the emergency. However, if there is more than one person in that situation, responsibility, blame and guilt are shared, and people tend not to act. The more people present, the less the likelihood that any individual will offer help.
Empathy
the ability to vicariously experience the emotions of another.
Batson’s empathy - altruism model
when faced with situations in which others may need help, people can either feel distress or empathy. Each of these reactions can determine helping behavior. Other psychologists disagree with this. The state that helping behavior only occurs when a person perceives she will benefit from helping others.
Distress
mental pain or anguish
Batson’s helping behavior experiments
Set of experiments in which subjects saw a person in distress (for instance, receiving electroshocks) They were placed in two conditions:
1)Easy escape condition: after two electro shocks they were given the opportunity to stop watching and go home.
2) Difficult escape condition: after two shocks, they were asked to stay and witness 10 shocks.
After the second shock, all the individuals completed a questionnaire that measured their level of distress and empathy. Then, they were told that the person being shocked, experimented traumatic shocks as a child and they were given the opportunity to receive the reimaining 8 shocks in his place.
Subjects in the easy-escape condition who reported more distress than empathy, tended to leave rather than help. Subjects who reported more empathy than distress were more likely to help regardless of whether they were in the easy or the difficult-escape conditions.
Frustration-aggression hypothesis
When people are frustrated, they act aggressively. Researchers have found that the strength of the frustration correlated with the level of aggression observed.
Modeling
Direct observation
Bandura’s famous study on the effect of modeling
Two groups of children (3-5 years old) observed either:
1) an adult playing with tinker toys
2) an adult showing aggressive behavior towards an inflated “Bobo” doll.
Then, each child was made to feel frustrated and then left alone in a room full of toys, including the rubber doll. Children who observed the aggressive behaviors were more likely to act aggressively to the doll. In some cases, the aggression was completely copied.
Bandura believed that aggressive behavior is selectively reinforced, people act aggressively because they expect some kind of reward (material benefit, social approval, attention).
Muzafer Sherif’s Conformity Study
Used the auto kinetic effect in an experiment. He put some students alone in a room completely dark room except for a light. The participants were asked to report how many times they saw the light moving. Then, he brought a group of students and made them (as a group) estimate the amount of movement. The subject’s solitary estimate changed so that the group agreed. Individuals conformed to the group. Judgements converged on some group norm.
Autokinetic effect
A point of light in a room that is otherwise completely dark will appear to move.
Conformity
yielding to group pressure/ yielding to group pressure when no specific demand has made to do so.
The tendency to align your attitudes, beliefs and behaviors with those around you.
Going along with real or perceived group pressure.
Solomon Asch’s Conformity Study
Put students in a panel telling them they will evaluate line lengths. 7 to 9 people were confederates of the experiment. There was only one subject. The subject was always sit one seat before the last. Participants had to compare lines and give the response to a given question in the same order they were sit. All people gave the right answer to the first question. However, in the second question, all confederates gave the wrong answer even when the right answer was obvious. Subjects gave the wrong answer to this question approx. 37% of the time and they gave at least one wrong answer 75% of the time, while in the control group, wrong answers to the second question were given less than 1% of the times.
Stanley Milgram’s experiment
Give an electric shock to a person when he gives the wrong answer.
3 experiments:
1) Yale
2) Conneticut
3) Indirect punishment by not delivering the shocks by themselves.
Experimenter prodded subject to give erlectric shocks by 4 sentences.
Subjects shocked person: majority continued shocking up to maximum voltage.
Three of the participants suffered from seizures and others showed signs of distress and nervousness.
Try to read again and again the experiment.
Compliance
A change in behavior that occurs as a result of situational or interpersonal pressure.Conforming to others to gain their approval and avoid their disapproval. Occurs when people go along publicly but not privately.
Foot-in-the-door effect
demonstrates that compliance with a small request increases the likelihood of compliance with a larger request. (the small request is reasonable)
Homeowners signed a petition for safe driving. A few weeks later were asked to put a sign in the front door that said “drive carefully”. Compliance was greater in this way than what is was in the control group.
Door-in-the-face effect
People who refuse a large initial request are more likely to agree to a later smaller request. (the large request is unreasonable).
College students were asked to serve as voluntary counselors for two years. Then, they were asked to serve as chaperone juvenils on a trip to the zoo. More subjects complied compared to the control group.
Doll preference study
Clark & Clark (1947)
The experimenter showed each children a black and a white doll and then asked several questions. Both black and white kids preferred the white doll. It highlighted the negative effects of racism and minority group status on the self-concept.
Later experiments showed that black children have positive views of their own ethnicity. This can be due to the changes in society and the use of improved methodologies.
Kenneth Clark & Mamie Clark
studied ethnic self-concept among ethnically white and black children using the famous doll preference experiment. Results were used in the 1954 Brown vs. the Topeka Board of Education case
Hierarchy of salience
the way identities are organized. An identity will emerge according to the situation and the hierarchy of salience for that situation.
The more salient the identity,the more we conform to _______
the role expectations of identities.
Social Perception
the ways we form impressions about the characteristics of individuals and of groups of people.
Primacy effect
Refers to those occasions when first impressions are more important than subsequent impressions.
Recency effect
When the most recent information we have about an individual is most important in forming our impressions.
Attribution theory
focuses on the tendency for individuals to infer the causes of other’s behavior. Heider
we are all naive psychologist that try to discover causes and effect in events and other’s behavior. People will attribute intentions and emotions to just about anything
Dispositional causes
related to the person whose behavior is considered. Includes beliefs, attitudes, and personality characteristics.
Situational causes
are external and are related to features of the surroundings like threats, money, social norms and peer pressure.
fundamental attribution error
Tendency for bias in evaluations of other people.
bias towards making dispositional attributions rather than situational attributions when inferring the causes of others’ behavior. It is not simply a bias, it is an error.
Halo effect
Tendency for bias in evaluations of other people.
Allow a general impression about a person ( I like Jill, in general) to influence other, more specific evaluations about a person ( Jill is a good writer, Jill can do no wrong).
This explains why people are often inaccurate in evaluations of people that they either believe to be generally good, or those that they believe to be generally bad.
Belief in a just world
Belief that good things happen to good people and bad things happen to bad people.
A strong belief in a just world increases the likelihood of “blaming the victim” since such a world view denies the possibility of innocent victims.
M. J. Lerner
Studied the tendency of individuals to believe in a just world.
Theodore Newcomb
Studied the influence of group norms. Studied political norms.
Theodore Newcomb’s study
Small woman’s college. Most of the parents were Republican. However, the college’s atmosphere was liberal. Each year of a student college career was marked by an increase in liberalism. Over time, students accepted the norms of their community. He studied:
1) Patrons of voting behavior (increase in votes for liberals specially among students of more advanced levels; Therefore, they started being republicans and ended up as liberals).
2) Follow up 20 years later. Most of the students who left school being liberals remained liberals and those who left conservatives remained conservatives. Liberals generally married liberals and those who married conservatives went back to their previous conservatism.
Edward Hall
There are cultural norms that govern how far away we stand from the people we’re speaking to. i.e.
1) USA intimate 1 foot
2) USA strangers several feet apart.
Proxemics
The study of how individuals space themselves in relation to others.
Zajonc, R. Theory - social facilitation effect
the presence of others increases arousal and consequently enhances the emission of dominant responses and impairs the emission of nondominant responses.
During early stages of learning, when everybody is amateur, the presence of others would enhance the wrong, dominant movements. However, in experimented performers, the presence of others will improve performance because the dominant movements are the right ones.
Social loafing
the tendency for people to put forth less effort when part of a group effort than when acting individually.
i.e. the team rope pulling (tug of war) is half of the sum of the individual strengths. the amount of clapping done by spectators at sporting events and the productivity of a collective farm.
if you closely monitor each person, it wipes the effect out
Philip Zimbardo
Worked on anonymity: people are more likely to commit antisocial acts when they feel anonymous within a social environment. When a person is anonymous, there is diminished restraint of unacceptable behavior.
Prison simulation
Study made by Phillip Zimbardo. Mock prison. 12 students prisoners, 12 students guards.
Prisoners were arrested, driven blindfolded to the mock prison, stripped, deloused and given uniforms with ID numbers.
Guards were told not to use physical violence. However, when a rebellion started on day 2, guards sprayed prisoners with carbon dioxide from a fire extinguisher, stripped them and putting the ringleaders on solitary confinement. A first prisioner had to be released because of uncontrollable crying, fits of rage and disorganized thinking. Three prisoners developed similar symptoms and fifth prisoner developed psychosomatic rash. The experiment, intended to last 2 weeks, lasted 6 days. The sense of self of individuals was overwhelmed by the roles they were playing, and they began acting their roles, forgetting they were university students participating in an experiment.
Deindividuation
Loss of self-awareness and of personal identity. It can be the result of mingling in a crowd, wearing uniforms or adopting a larger group identity in some way.
Irving Janis
Studied groupthink
studied decision making in groups and why these decisions sometimes go wrong. He revised archives and historical documents of government officials. Inferred that bad decision making in groups is due to groupthink.
Groupthink
tendency of decision-making groups to strive for consensus by not considering discordant information.
Bay of Pigs is an example of ____. Why?
The plan for this invasion stated that in the event of an unsuccessful initial landing, the invaders should retreat into the Escombre Mountains. No one revised a detailed map that showed there were 80 miles of swamps and marshes separating the place of initial landing from the mountains.
Risky shift
Group decisions are riskier than the average of the individual choices. This average riskiness of the individual choices can be considered to be an estimate of the group’s original riskiness. Therefore, there occurs a shift.
Value hypothesis
Risky shift occurs in situations in which riskiness is culturally valued. i.e. riskiness in business venture is culturally valued. The less members of a group will compare themselves with more risky members and then become riskier.
James Stoner
1968 - Studied group polarization
conducted an experiment in which he presented couples to examine the risky shift in controversial situations. He found a shift toward caution instead of risk. The shift depended on the content of the dilemma.
Group polarization
tendency for group discussion to enhance the group’s initial tendencies towards riskiness or caution. If a group originally has a tendency to be risky, further discussion will tend to make the group more risky and vice versa.
Leaders of groups engage in____ communication than nonreaders.
more
By artificially increasing the amount a person speaks, that person’s perceived leadership ________.
also increases
Kurt Lewin
conducted research to determine leadership styles. Manipulated leadership styles used to supervise boys in an after-school program. Each group experimenting a different leadership style. Founder of social psychology. Applied Gestalt ideas to social behavior. Field theory. Life space. Valence, vector, and barrier are forces in the life space.
Autocratic leadership style
- Provide clear expectations for what needs to be done, when it should be done, and how it should be done. 2. Set a clear division between the leader and the followers. 3. Make decisions independently with little or no input from the rest of the group.
groups leaded by this style were more aggressive, more hostile and more dependent on their leader in Lewin’s Study. Quantity of work was greater than in democratic groups but motivation and interest were stronger in the democratic groups.
Laissez-faire leadership style
Leader who offer little or no guidance and gives complete decision-making freedom to the group or to individual members, often leading to poorly defined roles and a lack of motivation.
groups leaded by this style were less efficient, less organized, and less satisfying for the boys than democratic groups according to Lewin’s study.
Democratic leadership style
he most effective leadership style. They 1. Offer guidance to group members while participating in the group and allowing input from other group members. Show less productivity, but higher quality contributions. Group members feel engaged in the process and are more motivated and creative.
groups leaded by this style were more satisfying and more cohesive than autocratic groups.
Quantity of work was greater than in democratic groups but motivation and interest were stronger in the democratic groups.
Cooperation
persons act together for their mutual benefit so that all of them can obtain a goal.
Competition
A person acts for his individual benefit so that he or she can obtain a goal that has limited availability.
Prisoner’s dilemma
Classic method for investigating people’s choices to compete or cooperate.
Prisoner A and B have been taken into custody for a felony. They are separated and can choose between confessing and not confessing. If both confess, they will be charged with a moderate sentence. If one confesses, the other will be left free and he will receive a harsh sentence. If neither of them confesses, they both will receive a misdemeanor. it is preferable to have:
1) be left free
2) misdemeanor
3) moderate sentence
4) receive a harsh sentence
Robber’s Cave experiment
Study on cooperation and competition. Muzafer Sherif.
Created hostilities through competition and then reduced the hostilities through cooperation.
Boy’s camp. 22 twelve-year-old boys.Two groups of boys. The groups did not know about the existence of the other group. One group had rude rules while the other had polite rules.
During week one, both groups engaged in cooperative activities, developed a status hierarchy, differentiation of roles and tasks, norms and self-adopted names.
During week two, both groups competed against each other and had rude behaviors. At the end of the week, both groups reported not wanting to see the other group again.
Researchers then tried to reduce hostility by:
1) 7 contact situations, i.e. going to the movies together - did not function.
2) activities in which they had to work together in order to solve a problem. (superordinate goals). Joint effort to reach these goals dramatically improved intergroup relations.
at the end they became quite friendly.
Group conflict is most effectively overcome by the need for cooperative attention to a higher superordinate goal between two parties
Muzafer Sherif
conducted conformity experiment - autokinetic effect
conducted robber’s cave experiment and found that having superordinate goals increased intergroup cooperation.
Superordinate goals
Goals that are best obtained through intergroup cooperation.
Alice Eagly
Suggested that gender differences in conformity were not due to gender, per se, but to differing social roles. Theory of role congruity.
Stanley Milgram
Studied obedience by asking subjects to administer electroshock. Proposed stimulus-overload theory explain differences between city and country dwellers.
Stimulus-overload theory
explains why urbanites are less prosocial than country people, they don’t need anymore interaction. they already have all the social interaction they need
False consensus bias
or false consensus effect.
is a cognitive bias whereby a person tends to overestimate how much other people agree with him or her. There is a tendency for people to assume that their own opinions, beliefs, preferences, values and habits are ‘normal’ and that others also think the same way that they do
Lee Ross
Worked on belief perseverance, cognitive biases and naive realism
Richard Nisbett
Lack of awareness
We all lack awareness into why we really do what we do. (aside: due to repression or biases, this is why psychotherapy is so important… integration of objective truths with subjective living/appraisals). the first comprehensive, empirically based argument that a variety of mental processes responsible for preferences, choices, and emotions are inaccessible to conscious awareness.
Representativeness heuristic
The representativeness heuristic is used when making judgments about the probability of an event under uncertainty
When people rely on representativeness to make judgements, they are likely to judge wrongly because the fact that something is more representative does not make it more likely
Availability heuristic
The availability heuristic is a mental shortcut that occurs when people make judgments about the probability of events by how easy it is to think of examples. The availability heuristic operates on the notion that, “if you can think of it, it must be important.”
if someone asked you whether your college had more students from Colorado or more from California, under the availability heuristic, you would probably answer the question based on the relative availability of examples of Colorado students and California students. If you recall more students that come from California that you know, you will be more likely to conclude that more students in your college are from California than from Colorado
What is compliance in conformity research?
Going along publicly with something, but not privately.
What is the effect of forewarning people?
Less likely to comply or conform
Zimbardo and Population Density
Found that anti-social crime correlates with population density
Specifically, what is the ingroup/outgroup bias?
it is the believe that your group has lots of positive traits, few negative, and the opposite of the other group. This is the basis of prejudice