Social Psychology Flashcards
Why we need to affiliate with other people (both in groups and close interpersonal relationships)
> Social comparison
Anxiety reduction
Information seeking
People tend to seek out people who…
We like. We like people who: > We consider physically attractive > Are nearby > Familiar > Available > We expect continued interaction from > Have similar attitudes and values as our own
Cohen and Hoberman’s Study (1983) Social support buffer
Individuals who felt their lives were very stressful and perceived themselves to have low social support reported more physical symptoms. High social support reported less.
Conclusion: appropriate social support is a ‘buffer’ against stressful events. Social integration is good for physical and psychological health.
Thibaut and Kelley (1959)
Coined ‘social exchange theory’
Social Exchange Theory
A theoretical framework for interpersonal relationships.
Relationship continues when both partners feel that the benefits of remaining in the relationship outweigh the costs and benefits of other relationships.
Equity Theory
Partners in intimate relationships are happier if they feel that both partners’ outcomes are proportional to their inputs, instead of one partner receiving more than they give.
Satisfaction in relationships highest when:
> Ratio of outcome: inputs is equal to the other’s
> They try and restore equity if they end up in an inequitable situation.
Why people join groups (simple)
> Looking for company
Looking for things they cannot do alone
Identifying with larger groups (social categories) such as nationality, religion, political party, etc.
Bonds of attraction
Joining a group establishes bonds of attraction to the group, its goal and its members. They form a cohesive entity.
Social Comparison Theory
We affiliate with similar others in order to obtain support and consensus for our own perceptions, opinions and attitudes.
Social Identity Theory
Group formation involves a processes of defining ourselves as group members, and conforming to what we see as the stereotype of our group, as distinct from other groups.
Tuckman’s model of Group Development (1965; Tuckman & Jensen, 1977)
- Forming - people orient themselves to one another
- Storming - struggle over leadership and group definition
- Norming - agreement on norms and roles
- Performing - well regulated internally, performs smoothly and efficiently
- Adjourning - issues of independence within the group. Possible group dissolution
Group Socialization (Levine and Moreland, 1994)
They believe that people move through different roles during lifetime of a group.
Generic roles in group (Levine and Moreland)
> Prospective member
New member
Full member
Marginal member (drift out but may be re-socialised if they drift back in)
Ex-member (former membership has lasting effect on both self and group)
Group norms
> They change with changing circumstances. They prescribe attitudes, feelings and behaviours that are appropriate for group members in a particular context.
Norms relating to group loyalty and central aspects of group life are more specific
High-status group members allowed more deviation from group norms
Working in a group
Drawbacks: > Social loafing > Poor decision making > More extreme decisions/opinions as group instead of individual members Positives: > More people involved > Social benefits > Enlarged human resource pool