Adult Attachment Flashcards
Internal Working Model
Influences us throughout lifespan, including romantic, familial and social relationships
Patterns of behaviour learned early in life, lay foundations for future relationships
Model of self-avoidance
Adult attachment (compared to parents’)
Often the same (80%). When not, reactionary.
Parent’s style shows predictive validity - high levels of similarity between parent and child patterns
Love relationships - Hazan and Shaver (1987) (general)
Groundbreaking analysis of love and romantic relationships
Love as an emotion - a complex pattern of appraisals and action tendencies
Relationship between love and attachment
Love is integration of behavioural systems
Romantic love - Hazan and Shaver (1987) (elictors and reactions)
Elictors
Familiarity with each other
Other satisfy’s your needs
Other inspires you with trust
Reactions
Security and self-confidence
Wanting to give to each other
Wanting physical closeness
^^ All consistent with goals of attachment behaviour
Hazen & Shaver (1987+) (Parallels)
Strong parallels exist between child-parent relationship and love relationships.
There are important differences - reciprocal caregiving and sexuality
Hazan & Shaver’s proposition (3 systems)
- Attachment
- Caregiving
- Sexuality
^ Love is an integration of three behavioural systems
Each interlocks with differing importance throughout the life cycle. Attachment is pivotal and lays foundation for the others
Love Attachment Styles (Adult)
Secure – comfortable with intimacy, able to trust and depend on people
Avoidant – difficulties with depending on others, discomfort with closeness
Ambivalent – Seeking extreme closeness, fear of being abandoned or not loved sufficiently
Adult Attachment Type A (Ds)
Avoidant Insecure-Dismissive
Usually attempt to down-play influence of attachment relationships in daily life.
Dismiss, devalue or deny the importance of attachment relationships.
Cut off from their feelings may need prompting to elaborate
Portray a strong theme of self-reliance and stress independence.
May sometimes openly derogate AFs while claiming personal strength and self-reliance.
Adult Attachment Type B (F)
Secure - Free or Autonomous
Usually show a balanced and objective view of attachment relationships.
Largely have access to their feelings, able to reflect on good and bad prior experiences.
Able to avoid attributing feelings of shame or blame to extremes.
Able to cope with separation and display autonomy.
Coherent descriptions and relevant info
Adult Attachment Type C (E)
Ambivalent/Enmeshed Insecure-Preoccupied
Entangled in their relationships and pre-occupied
Usually report being clingy and needy or coercive and manipulative as a child
Often over involved/absorbed in relationships
Discourse may be incoherent
Usually confused, un-objective and mentally entangled throughout AAI
May be unable to move beyond excessive preoccupation with past attachment relationships
Either accept it passively
Or struggle against it without success
Adult Attachment Type D (U)
Disorganised/Unresolved
May show any of above patterns but usually with lapses of memory or confusion during AAI
Trauma or loss may be raised inappropriately showing inability to put them in past or resolve them in present
Display no consistent strategy
Show high distress
(Ainsworth et al., 1978; George, Kaplan & Main,1985)