Social Psychology Flashcards
Outline Cruthchfeilds experiment and results
Conformity in private
Range of participants- men women army officers
Participants day alone on cubicles questions projected on screen and incorrect answer appeared
Personality test
Found same levels of conformity as Asch’s, personality test revealed higher levels of conformity if “intellectually less effective” submissive inhibited with a inferiority complex
Outline Asch’s experiment and results
Lab Carried out 12 times 8 participants,1 participants per grp Match lines, all confederates gave wrong answer In control grp- 0.7% wrong Experimental grp- 75% wrong
Extensions to Asch
Perrin and spencer- 396 science and engineering students- only 1 case of conformity
Smith and bond- meta analysis- more conformity in collectivist society’s (Fiji and Japan)
Outline zimbardo
1973 Stanford uni. Divided class into guards and prisoners. Guards wore mirrored glasses and prisoners wore shackles and uniform. Arrested at home. Zimbardo was chief guard. Guards became increasingly aggressive and it was abandoned.
What is compliance
Going along with the majority even if we have different ideas because we want to appear normal, because being identified with the majority is desirable. We go along with the majority without analysing why the difference in ideas exist. this results in public compliance where there little private attitude change.
What is informational social influence
ISI is where you change your behaviour because you believe the group is right. You change both your public and private beliefs and internalise that of the group. This type of social influence usually results in a long-term change and remains even if the group is not present.
What are the real life implications of zimbardo
Abu Ghraib prison. Lyndie England
Outline sherif 1935
Lab experiment. Repeated measures design. Autokinetic effect.
1-Participants asked to estimate how far light moves. PERSONAL NORM
2- put in groups of 3, made estimates. GROUP NORM
3- retested and have group answer. INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE
When in group first norms appeared quicker
Jones et al 2000
Tennessee teacher complained of funny smell which made her feel ill. School evacuated as 80 students and 19 teachers became ill.
Extensive searches found nothing
Reicher and Haslam
Controlled filmed groups in mock prison. 15 make volunteers- 5 guards 10 prisoners. Daily test for depression and stress. After 3 days one would be chosen to become a guard. Guards felt uncomfortable rebellion on day 6 and agreed on democracy but former prisoners wanted stricter regime. Abandoned due to stress
What did zimbardo say cruel behaviour was
Situational not dispositional
Rotter
‘locus of control’. people with an internal locus of control believe that events are because of your own actions and external locus of control believe that events are brought about by luck, fate or the actions of others.
Milgram 1963
lab
> Yale Uni
> 40 male pps (paid)- social contract
> experimenter in lab coat- legitimate authority
> asked to shock student if gave wrong answer 15V-450V
>100%- 300V and 65%-450V
Milgrams extensions
Allies- 10%
Proximity to victim- 40%
proximity to authority- 23%
shabby office- 48%
evaluate milgram
> lab
ethically bad
paid- social contract
yale is prestigious