Social Psychology 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Altruism

A

Behaving in a way that helps another person with no apparent gain or with potential cost to oneself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reciprocal Altruism

A

Theory that natural selection favors animals that behave in an altruistic way if the likely benefit to each individual exceeds the likely cost over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ethical hedonism

A

The school of philosophical thought that asserts that all behaviour, no matter how apparently altruistic, is and should be designed to increase one’s own pleasure or reduce one’s own pain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Aversive-arousal reduction model

A

Helping relieves the negative feelings aroused through empathy with a person in distress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Three levels of prosocial behaviour.

A

Micro: altruistic tendencies and individual differences are considered primarily in terms of biological processes, developmental and personality factors or evolutionary theory.

Meso: behaviours of helper–recipient dyads are studied according to specific situations.

Macro: Prosocial actions at the macro level are examined within the context of groups and large organisations, such as volunteering. Various theories underpin our understanding of altruism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Obedience

A

A social influence process whereby individuals follow the dictates of an authority. Can be pro-social or anti-social (war crimes, cults, crimes). Important to maintain social order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Conformity

A

The process by which people change their attitudes or behaviour to accommodate the standards of peers or groups (peer pressure, gangs, group norms, online ‘trolling’). Conformity varies across and within cultures, and tends to reflect economic and ecological demands. Few, if any, gender differences in conformity exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Factors that strengthen Obedience

A

Proximity to victim
Proximity to authority figure
Personality (hostility)
Legitimacy of authority
Liberating effects (following other people)
Directiveness of commands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reasons for conforming:

A

Normative Social Influence- conform to fit in and be part of a group.

Informative Social Influence- accept information from others (pressured).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Factors that strengthen conformity

A

Number of people in group, everyone in the group agrees, the group’s perceived status.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Social influence

A

Refers to the influence of the presence of other people on thought, feeling and behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The Milgram Experiment

A

Also known as the electric shock experiment, where participants thought they were giving an electric shock to people when they got an answer wrong. This experiment relates to Obedience. The Milgram studies indicated that most people will obey without limitations of conscience if they believe the authority is legitimate. 65% of participants conducted experiment to the end.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Asch Study

A

Highlighted conformity, as participants would say the wrong answer if all other members of the group said the wrong answer. If one member was correct, the subject would also answer correctly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Zimbardo Experiment

A

Also known as the Stanford Prison Experiment. A mock prison was developed to investigate conformity, obedience, and roles. In this experiment participants were assigned the roles of either prison guards or prison inmates. The study was supposed to run for two weeks but was ended after six days due to the participant’s extreme behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bystander effect

A

Phenomenon where people are less likely to help others when there is a group of people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Diffusion of responsibility

A

If there are a lot of people around, an individual will not take responsibility because they assume someone else will.

17
Q

Social Loafing

A

Another example of behaviours that occur within social groups where people exert less effort in a group setting. Another diffusion of responsibility.

18
Q

Techniques of social influence

A

Ways we can manipulate people’s behaviours.

19
Q

Foot-in-the-door technique

A

“Hey I missed class this week, can you please give me your notes?” “Great! Would it be OK if I had notes from the previous weeks too?”. Start with smaller request then increasing it when it is accepted.

20
Q

Door-in-the-face technique

A

“Hey mum, can I please have $100 for shopping today?” Mum: “No” “Can I have $50 please”. Starting with a larger and exaggerated request then decreasing it after it is refused.

21
Q

Bait-and-switch technique

A

“There is actually already an offer on this house that has been accepted, but we also have a listing just down the road I can show you”. Presenting an appealing option that is not available then offering another available option that is not as appealing.

22
Q

Labelling technique

A

Shopping mall charity donation employee: “Oh it looks like you must really love dogs, would you like to donate to the [dog charity]”. Assigning a label to someone then asking for a consistent request.

23
Q

Low-ball technique

A

“Your artificial lawn will be $1795.” “Plus $565 for installment”. Starting with low request then revealing hidden cost after it has been agreed to.

24
Q

Legitimization-of-paltry-favors technique

A

“You can sponsor a child for only the cost of a coffee per week”. Make the request more appealing by reducing perceived cost by comparing to affordable items or offering smaller instalments.

25
Q

That’s-not-all technique

A

“Purchase today and receive another set completely free”. Start with inflated cost then immediately adding a bonus.

26
Q

Group

A

A collection of people whose actions affect the other group members.

27
Q

Reference group

A

The group to which a person refers when taking a particular action. A reference group can be positive or negative. A reference group is considered positive if the person tries to emulate its members and meet their standards. A reference group is negative if a person rejects its members and disavows their standards.

28
Q

Norms

A

Standards for the behaviour of group members.

29
Q

Roles

A

A position within a group that defines appropriate behaviour for the person occupying it. Individuals internalise roles as role schemas, which direct their behaviour when they are in a particular role and lead them to expect certain responses from people with complementary roles

30
Q

Leaders

A

People who exercise greater influence than the average member of a group. Instrumental leaders take responsibility for seeing that the group completes its tasks. Social–emotional leaders try to keep the group working cohesively and with minimal animosity.

31
Q

Social facilitation

A

When people are performing dominant, well-learned behaviours, the presence of other people can facilitate performance. On the other hand, when people are performing non-dominant behaviours, or behaviours with which they are unfamiliar, the presence of others can hurt performance.

32
Q

Group polarisation

A

A movement towards a decision that is at the extreme position, either conservative or risky. May be increased with less face-to-face interaction.

33
Q

Group cohesiveness

A

People tend to cluster together to be viewed even more favourably by members of their ingroup.

34
Q

Groupthink

A

Where members of a group make decisions based more on maintaining group harmony and cohesiveness than a critical analysis of the realities of a situation. Having a member with opposing views may increase better quality decisions when warranted but lower moral and reduce group cohesion and satisfaction with the task.

35
Q

Bystander intervention

A

To intervene, a person must notice the event, define it as an emergency and assume personal responsibility for intervening. Situational determinants of whether or not people will help interact with individual difference variables, such as gender, determine when helping will occur.