social psychological explanations; frustration-aggression hypothesis Flashcards
what is the OG aggression-frustration hypothesis
dollard et al (1939)
= frustration always leads to aggression, and aggression always result of frustration
aggression = psych. drive similar to bio. drive, e.g., hunger
= cathartic response to when attempts to reach goal are blocked by some external factor (frustration)
3 reasons why aggression not always expressed directly against source of frustration
- abstract cause of frustration
e.g., state of economy, government - too powerful of a cause = risk punishment by aggressing
- cause may be unavailable at the time
= displace anger
weapon effect
berkowitz = frustration merely creates readiness for aggression
- presence of aggressive cues
= increased likelihood of acting on aggression
how did berkowitz and lepage test for the weapon effect
lab study, pps given electric shocks by confederate = create anger/frustration
pps later had opportunity to reciprocate on confederate
guns on table = increased no. of shocks pps gave
who conducted research into how frustration affects aggression
geen (1968)
geen’s (1968) research on frustration-aggression
- investigated how frustration affect aggression
method;
male uni students completed jigsaw puzzle
- level of frustration = experimentally manipulated in 1/3 ways;
1. puzzle impossible to solve
2. ran out of time due confederate continuously interfering
3. confederate insulted pps as failed to solve puzzle
= all pps later given opportunity to give confederate electric shocks
findings;
insulted pps gave strongest shocks on avg, followed by interfered groups
- all 3 groups = selected more intense shocks than control group
strength of frustration-aggression hypothesis
research support
newhall et al = metanalysis of 49 studies of displaced aggression
= concluded displaced aggression is a reliable phenomenom
- provoked frustrated pps unable to retaliate directly against source of frustration directly = more likely to displace compared to unprovoked frustrated pps
= support idea that frustration can lead to aggression against weaker/more available target
limitation of frustration-aggression hypothesis
research against aggression being cathartic
bushman = found pps who vented anger by repeatedly hitting punchbag acc became more aggressive compared to pps that simply did nothing
- argued that using venting to reduce anger, is like using petrol to put out fire
= suggest central assumption of FAH is invalid
further limitation of frustration-aggression hypothesis
misleading link
OG hypothesis = suggest frustration always lead to aggression
- nothing acc ‘automatic’ about link between the 2
- feeling frustrated may behave in range of diff ways, e.g., helpless/determined rather than aggressive, vice versa for someone who is acting aggressively = not necessarily due to frustration
= suggest FAH inadequate due to only explaining how aggression arises in some situations, not all