Social Intelligence & Communication Flashcards
SOCIAL LEARNING MECHANISMS
OBSERVATIONAL CONDITIONING
STIMULUS/LOCAL ENHANCEMENT
IMITATION
TOOL USE
TEACHING
COMMUNICATION
OBSERVATIONAL/VICARIOUS CONDITIONING
- monkeys fearing snakes
- naiive monkey doesn’t fear snake
- observes fear reaction in other w/snake present
- conditioned fear of snakes
- particularly important in phobias
ENHANCEMENT
- blue tits & milk
- demonstrators beh draws observers attention to location/stimulus
- makes imitation hard to establish
IMITATION
- when enhancement/observational conditioning can’t explain new beh
- quail/rats/budgerigars/pigeons
- 2-action test
- set up 2 dif responses both delivering same reward (ie. pressing lever)
- demonstrator performs 1 response to stimuli; observer watches; then test observer
- same response could be =
1. imitation evidence
2. priming of response; may not require effort; concept of mirror neurons
IMITATION: RATS
HEYES ET AL. (1990)
- response = pushing joystick to left/right (not typical beh); bi-directional response controls for enhancement effects
- rats observed demonstrator pushing joystick; transferred to demonstrator chamber; reinforced for pushing either direction (preferred to push in same direction)
- BUT turned out observer only followed smell of demonstrator on joystick aka. enhancement
IMITATION: PRIMATES
- potato washing in Japanese macaques
- spread in pop too slow to be imitation (stimulus enhancement)
- anecdotal evidence (problem of anthropomorphising)
- conclusion = inconclusive evidence for true imitation
TEACHING
- intentional learning facilitation w/teacher costs
- flavour prefs in rats/mobbing in birds = NOT teaching
- little intentional teaching evidence in animals; only beh helping young educate themselves/direct attention to object/location/beh (ie. meerkat guard giving young de-tailed scorpion to learn hunting)
COMMUNCATION TYPES
REFERENTIAL
TACTICAL
COMMUNICATION: PIGEONS
- receiver/sender set up; sender sends 2 lights; cannot be directly viewed by receiver BUT can see sender; 2 response keys (L/R); sender cannot see them either
- both rewarded if correct response key clicked (green = L, red = R)
- receiver settles on 1 key (ie. L) eventually; correct 50%; BUT sender has contingency issue aka. red doesn’t feed it -> Pavlovian conditioning (green = food) -> sender only comes out for food (discriminative stimulus for receiver) aka. peck R when seen, L when not
- not exactly communication
COMMUNICATION VS EXPLOITATION
- advantage for sender = manipulation of beh for others
- benefits for both?
- communication = intention to send message to receiver
- reliable effect on receiver’s beh
- can be between species
REFERNTIAL COMMUNICATION
- releaser/FAP communication = no decision; direct instruction to receiver
- referential communication = messages give varied info about external matters to sender/receiver (ie. dance language of honey bees/vervet monkey alarm calls)