social intelligence Flashcards

1
Q

what argments are there for multiple intelligences

A

IQ does not provide a full account of indivudal differences in life success

suggestion that interpersonal skills (social intelligence) as independent from IQ and that these can be more important irl than academic abilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

is there a definition of social intelligence

A

difficult to categorically say whether social intelligence is distinct from emotional intelligence

idea of ‘dealing with others’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how does Thorndike (1920) conceive of social intelligence

A

thorndike (1920): ability to read people like a book, manage others, act wisely in social relationships, contrast with mechanical and abstract intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did Vernon (1933) talk of social intelligence

A

ability to get along with people in general
social techniques
ease in society
knowledge of social matters
susceptibility to stimuli from other members of a group
insight into the temporary moods / underlying personality traits of strangers

ability rather than preference (resembles knowledge of social matters) - personality?

is it objectively testable - can we have a correct answer (accurately identifying anotheres emotions)

different from cognitive abilty?

predicts unique variance/ life outcomes?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Gardner’s 1983 theory of multiple intelligences

A

there are different types of intelligence and these are entirely distinct
intrapersonal intelligence concerns self-awareness, personal cognisance, personal objectivity, the capability to understand oneself, relationship to others, the world and one’s needs and reactions to change

interpersonal: perception of other’s feelings, ability to relate to others, interpretation of behaviour and communications, understanding the relationship between people and their situations, including other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what types of intelligence have been proposed

A

visuo-spatial, linguisitc/verbal, logical/mathematical, bodily/kinesthetic, musical , interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic

notes factor analysis of these produced 3 factors: general intelligence, kinesthetic and musical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the measurement problem with social intelligence

A

need to make sure we do not confound social intelligence with personality

social intelligence is mutlfacited and there is great variation in the types of skills it encompasses (Happe & Frith, 2014)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what early tests exist for social intelligence

A

GWIST: judgement in social situations, memory of names and faces, recognition of the mental states behind words (Hunt, 1928)

PONS: films clips of a woman in an emotional state, must identify emotion (Rosenthal, 1979)

select faces and voices displaying the same mental state (Guildford & Hoepfner, 1971)

Photographs of 2 people in 2 conditions, asked to identify friends or strangers and who was supervisor (Sternberg & Smith, 1985)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the proposed structure of intelligence for testing g

A

verbal intelligence and performance intelligence

verbal intelligence includes vocab, similarities, synonyms, digit span, arithmetic, comprehension

performance intelligence includes block design (visualisation ability), symbol search(information processing speed and visual perception), matrix reasoning, digit-symbol substitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the proposed structure of social intelligence s

A

representation of another’s cognitive state and representation of another’s emotions

representing anothers cognitive state includes theory of mind, imitation, social attention , biomotion perception (human figure moving from limited stimuli), social leanring, metacognition

representing anothers emotional state includes: social reward, affective touch (emotional facets of tactile sensation), empathy

both include the self-other distinction (representaiotn of our own actions, sensations and emotions and others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

are social abilities correlated?

are they independent of g?

A

GWIST.54 correlation with equivalent IQ test (Hunt, 1928)

FA of GWIST and other IQ tests failed to show a distinct social factor (Woodrow, 1939)

no relationship between IQ tests and PONS and no relationship between friend and supervisor task (Sternver & Smith, 1985)

tests of social ability correlate .28 on average, tests of social ability and IQ tests correlate .33 on average (Keating, 1978) –> no distinct social factor, IQ can explain some of the differences in social ability

Seven social factors independent of traditional measures of intelligence (Schneider et al., 1996)

FA of the large battery of 5 social tests (social interest, social skills, empathy, emotionality, and social anxiety) that were distinct from verbal and abstract intelligence

need better tests
lack of non-social condition
low ecological validity
expliciti vs implicit social cognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

why is there so much variance across studies

A

variance in aptitude tested, face recognition, emotion recognition, ToM, social motivation

variance in assessment method: self-report, objective tests

self-report measures require self-awareness (correlated with personality especially extraversion, openness and agreeableness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is implicit mentalising

A

the ability to represent the mental state of the self and othres
(referred to as ToM, cognitive empathy, mind reading)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the two mentalising systems

A

implicit system: efficient, automatic, early developing

explicit system: cognitively demanding, late developing

kids under 4 are not able to explicitly mentalise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

is mentalising domain-specific or domain-general

A

domain-specific proponants argue that implicit mentalising effects reflect specific processing of mental states that is an innate ability

domain-general proponents argue for submentalising processes where effects relfect non-social processing due to attentional cueing and perceptual novelty (issue of poor experimental research)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the dot perspective task

A

must count number of dots on a wall
a human avatar is either facing all the dots (consistent) or not (inconsistent)

RT is faster on consistent trials than inconsistent ones

to assess whether this is a domain-specific mentalising effect or domain-general attentional cueing effect an arrow stimulus is introduced as a control - the same pattern of results are found

does not rule out that we adopt the mental state of the avatar, visibility is subsequently manipulated such that a blind avatar is introduced using the telescope method / cloaking device (inc familiarisation trial)
no efffect of telescope type

directionality of central stimulus may be sufficient to explain consistency effect