Social Influence [U1] Flashcards

Krill boarself

1
Q

Asch (1951) and Asch (1955) on NSI

A
  • Evaluating NSI
  • Post-OG-Experiment interviews on participants, who reported they wanted to avoid ‘disapproval’ from the others (Asch 1951)
  • Repeat experiment where answers were written and conformity fell to 12.5% (Asch 1955)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lucas et al. on ISI

A
  • Participants given a mathematical problem and a potential answer
  • Greater conformity in harder questions
  • In ambiguity, participants conformed to be correct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Low clarity in conformity explanations

A
  • Conformity can be explained using either
  • E.g. in Asch, a dissenter could provide social support or an alternative info source
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Orne & Holland & Perry on Milgram

A
  • 75% of participants believed shocks were real (Milgram)
  • Participants didn’t believe and were acting (Orne & Holland)
  • Listened to tapes of Milgram’s participants. Half believed the shocks, two thirds of these non-believers were disobedient (Perry)
  • DCs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sheridan & King on puppies

A
  • Delivered shocks to puppies
  • 54% of males and 100% of females administered fatal shocks
  • Counterpoint to Orne & Holland
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Milgram’s impact on Psych’s Reputation

A
  • Right to withdraw, protection from harm
  • One participant had a seizure, observed extreme signs of anxiety like sweating & nail biting.
  • Several prompts (5) before allowed to leave
  • Bad for Psych’s reputation, can harm future research and reduce people’s trust in the field
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lucas et al. on Task Difficulty (+CP)

A
  • Ppts. given easy and hard math problems
  • Also given three wrong answers from other students
  • Harder problems led to greater conformity to wrong answers

BUT

  • Conformity is more complex
  • Higher confidence in maths skills led to less conformity
  • Individual-variation can affect impact of situational variables, which Asch failed to account for
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fisk on Asch’s Research

A
  • Artificial situation
  • Conforming to demand characteristics
  • No consequences to being incorrect, no reason not to conform. Low external validity (Fisk)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bond & Smith and Neto on Asch’s Sample

A
  • 123 white american males
  • Woman are more conformist, because they are more concerned with social relationships (Neto)
  • Conformity research in collectivist cultures has found it to be higher (Bond & Smith)
  • Gender & Culture Bias (Beta)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Zimbardo’s control of variables

A
  • High control
  • Ppts. Screened for emotional stability & personality
  • Results aren’t due to individual differences or participant variables, but due to pressure of situation
  • High internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fromm on Zimbardo’s conclusions

A
  • Overlooked role of personality
  • Guard behaviour varied drastically
  • A third of guards were extremely sadistic, but a few were sympathetic, offering them cigarettes and reinstating lost privileges
  • Zimbardo overstated influence of social rules
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explaining the atrocities of Abu Ghraib

A
  • Zimbardo likened the SPE & Abu Ghraib
  • Lack of training or accountability + endless boredom = brutality and abuse
  • The assigned roles and opportunity for power misuse fuelled this abuse
  • RW Application
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Blass & Schmitt on the sociopsychological explanations

A
  • Had students watch Milgram’s footage
  • Asked who was responsible for harming the learner, students said experimenter
  • Also identified experimenter was at top of social hierarchy, and an assumed expert
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tarnow & Authority in Aviation

A
  • Reviewed NTSB data of accidents, which had flight voice recorders and were due to flight crew actions
  • Found excessive dependence on captain’s authority & expertise
  • One officer said nothing when a captain took a risky approach, because he assumed competence
  • Increase theory credibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rank & Jacobson on sociopsychological explanations

A
  • Cannot explain all findings
  • 16/18 hospital nurses refused to administer an excessive drug dose from a doctor
  • Only when familiar with drug and with other nurses
  • Nurses remained autonomous
  • Can only partially explain obedience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Christie & Jahoda on Adorno’s Political Bias

A
  • F-scale only measures extreme right-wing ideologies
  • Ignores authoritarianism in left-wing politics, like Chinese Maoism
  • Core bias means theory cannot account for obedience across diverse political range
17
Q

Impracticalities of Adorno’s Explanation

A
  • Cannot explain whole population’s obedience
  • E.g. Nazi Germany
  • Everyone was racist and anti-semitic, but not all were the same personality type
  • Can’t have all been raised the same way
  • Adorno is limited because alt. explanations, like social identity theory, are more realistic
18
Q

Milgram & Elms on Adorno’s Work

A
  • Interviewed 20 fully obedient and 20 disobedient Ppts. post-Milgram-Experiment
  • Obedient Ppts. scored higher on F-scale and had more characteristics linked to Auth. personality
  • Reinforces link between Auth. personality and higher obedience
19
Q

Albrecht et al. on Social Support

A
  • Evaluated an 8 week anti-smoking programme for pregnant teens
  • When an older participant buddy gave social support, participants were significantly less likely to smoke than a control
20
Q

Holland on Locus of Control

A
  • Repeated Milgram and measured Loci
  • 37% of internal Loci Ppts. disobeyed the highest shock, while 27% of external Loci ppts. disobeyed
21
Q

Rotter on Rotter’s Loci of Control

A
  • Only applicable in unknown/novel situations
  • If you obeyed or conformed in a situation in the past, you will do so again
  • Therefore LoC only useful in new and ambiguous situations
  • Shouldn’t be used in isolation and we should be conscientious of other factors
22
Q

Wood et al. on consistency

A
  • Meta analysis of 100 moscovici-like studies
  • The most consistent minorities were the most influential
  • Large sample = Highly representative
23
Q

Low external validity of minority research

A
  • Heavily controlled labs and artificial settings
  • Majority has more power & status
  • Oft used to oppress and oppose minority groups
  • This power dynamic is absent in research
  • Findings are limited when it comes to applying them
24
Q

Poor sample in Moscovici’s work

A
  • All american women
  • Beta bias means no data on men
  • Unable to generalise
  • Women are more likely to conform (Neto)
  • An incomplete picture
  • Research has low population validity
25
Q

Nolan et al. on NI in SC

A
  • Hung messages on front door of people’s houses in San Diego
  • Messages said residents were trying to reduce energy usage
  • Control simply asked to save energy
  • Significant different in decrease between both groups
  • Supports conformity role in SC
26
Q

Foxcroft et al. on social norms & SC

A
  • As part of the Cochrane collaboration, they reviewed 70 studies where the social norms approach was used towards alcoholic students
  • A small reduction in quantity of drinking
  • No change to frequency of drinking
  • NI doesn’t always produce long-term SC
27
Q

Mackie on deeper processing in SC

A
  • It’s the majority view that encourages deeper processing, not the minority view
  • We like to assume everyone thinks the same as us
  • We think hard about the majority’s view when this assumption is challenged
  • Presents conflicting views, casting doubt on its validity