Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

PN Year 12 - D Block > Social Influence: Milgram & Situational Variables Affecting Obedience 2024/25 > Flashcards

Social Influence: Milgram & Situational Variables Affecting Obedience 2024/25 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
NCLEX-PN® flashcards
1
Q

What is meant by obedience?

A

Where somebody acts in response to a direct order from a figure of perceived authority

Definitions of named concepts are important as it links with the BP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the aim of Milgram’s experiment?

A

To investigate if individuals would obey the orders of an authority figure even if this led to negative consequences

All research aims will begin with the phrase “to investigate”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What research method did Milgram use?

A

Lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Where did Milgram’s study take place? What makes this study a lab experiment?

Consider the environment it took place in

A
  • Yale university
  • It is an artificial / controlled environment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many people took part in Milgram’s experiment? Why can it be considered gender biased?

A
  • 40 participants (aged 20-50)
  • They were all male
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • Who is it difficult to generalise Milgram’s study to?
  • Why?
A
  • Difficult to generalise to females
  • Females may have obeyed differently

Remember to link to the BP - obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did Milgram gather his participants?

A

Advert in a newspaper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • What did the ‘shock level’ begin at?
  • What did it increase by?
  • What was the maximum shock level?
A
  • 15 volts
  • 15 volt increments
  • 450 volts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened if the ‘teacher’ refused?

A

The experimenter used a ‘prompt’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was one prompt used by the experimenter?

A
  • “Please continue.”
  • “The experiment requires that you continue.”
  • “It is absolutely essential that you continue.”
  • “You have no other choice; you must go on.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How many participants (in %) went to at least 300 volts?

A

100%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How many participants (in %) stopped at 300 volts?

A

12.5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How many participants (in %) went to 450 volts

A

65%

Obeying to 450v showed high levels of obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What 3 situational variables did Milgram investigate?

A
  • Proximity
  • Location
  • Uniform

You must know what these variables are, how they were tested, and what was found

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is meant by proximity in the context of Milgram’s research?

A

How close the ‘teacher’ is to the ‘learner’ or experimenter

Misconception: Milgram varied the proximity to both the ‘victim’ and the ‘experimenter’ - who is the authority figure. This is often forgotten.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did Milgram investigate proximity?

There are 2 ways in which this was done

A
  1. ‘Teacher’ was required to force the learners hand onto a shock plate (touch proximity)
  2. The experimenter left the room and gave instructions over phone

Students often forget the 2 ways, and instead focus on just one - you need to be aware of both the procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did Milgram find when investigating ‘touch proximity’?

Remember to compare this to the finding from the original experiment

A

Obedience decreased

Dropped from 65% to 30%

18
Q

What did Milgram find when the experiment gave the instructions over the phone?

A

Obedience decreased

Dropped from 65% to 20.5%

19
Q

What did Milgram conclude from investigating proximity?

Remember a conclusion is an overall statement based on the findings

A

The closer an authority figure is, the more obedient an individual will be

20
Q

How did Milgram investigate location?

Remember to compare to the original experiment here

A

Moved the experiment from a prestigous university to a run down office

Make sure to use the word “run-down” - AQA are quite picky about their wording of this

21
Q

What did Milgram find when he invesitgated how location affects obedience?

Remeber to compare to the original experiment here

A

Obedience decreased

Dropped from 65% to 48%

22
Q

Why did obedience decrease when the location was changed?

A

The legitimacy of the experimenters authority was reduced

Remember it is important to know the reason a finding occured, as well as what the finding actually is

23
Q

How did Milgram investigate uniform?

Remember to compare to the original experiment here

A

Changed the experimenters uniform from a grey lab coat to everyday clothes

24
Q

What was found when Milgram investigated uniform?

Remember to compare to the original experiment here

A

Obedience decreased

Dropped from 65% to 20%

25
Q

Why did obedience decrease when the experiments uniform was changed?

A

The legitimacy of the experimenters authority was reduced

Remember it is important to know the reason a finding occured, as well as what the finding actually is

26
Q

What did Milgram conclude from investigating uniform?

A

Uniform acts as a visual symbol of authority

27
Q

What did obedience levels drop from and to when Milgram investigated location?

A

From 65% to 48%

28
Q

What did obedience levels drop from and to when Milgram investigated uniform?

A

From 65% to 20%

29
Q

What did obedience levels drop from and to when Milgram investigated ‘touch proximity’?

A

From 65% to 30%

30
Q

What did obedience levels drop from and to when Milgram had the experimenter give instructions over the phone?

A

From 65% to 20.5%

31
Q

AO3 Focus

What did Bickman do in his research to support Milgram?

A
  • Asked confederates to dress in 3 different outfits (security guard, milkman, and business man)
  • Ask passers-by to give money to pay for parking or pick up litter

This will be the first E of your PEEL

32
Q

AO3 Focus

What did Bickman find in his research to support Milgram?

A

Participants were 2x as likely to obey the security guard than the businessman

This will be the second E of your PEEL

33
Q

AO3 Focus

Bickman’s research supports the power of uniform - why?

This will be the Link in your PEEL

A

Uniform acted as a visual cue for legitimate authority, so obedience increases

This will be the Link in your PEEL

34
Q

AO3 Focus

  • Who is it difficult to generalise all of Milgram’s research into situational variables to?
  • Why?

This will form the first E in your PEEL

A
  • Difficult to generalise to females
  • Females may have obeyed differently

Remember to refer to obedience - this is your BP
This will form the first E in your PEEL

35
Q

AO3 Focus

  • Why may females obey differently to males?
  • What research is there to support this?

For top band, this would need to be included in your PEEL

A
  • Their gender roles may dictate that they be more submissive - and therefore more obedient
  • Sheridan & King; when asked to shock a puppy, females obeyed 100% of the time compared to 54% of males

For top band, this would need to be included in your PEEL

36
Q

AO3 Focus

Why is Milgram’s research into situational variables of obedience being gender biased a weakness?

This would form the link of your PEEL

A

It weakens the external validity of the research as variables may affect obedience in some people more than others

This would form the link of your PEEL

37
Q

AO3 Focus

“Situational variables affecting obedience are an external explanation for obedience”

What is an alternative explanation for obedience?

A

The authoritarian personality

38
Q

AO3 Focus

How is the authoritarian personality as an explanation for obedience different to situational variables?

This would form the first E of your PEEL

A

Authoritarian personality suggests obedience is due to internal characteristics e.g. personality

WHEREAS

Situational variables suggest obedience is due to external factors e.g. the situation / environment

Remember when writing an alternative explanation PEEL, you MUST outline the difference between the two explanations

39
Q

AO3 Focus

Why does the authoritarian personality weaken research into situational variables?

A

Because it shows it is not the only explanation for obedience

This would form the Link of your PEEL

40
Q

AO3 Focus

What 3x PEEL’s would you use to evaluate Milgram’s research into situational variables of obedience?

A
  • Research to support by Bickman
  • Gender bias
  • Alternative explanation of authoritarian personality

Revision tip: Write these down on a post-it note and stick it on the AO3 page of your booklet - it will make revision a bit more ‘bitesize’

PN Year 12 - D Block (19 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions