Social Influence - Conformity Flashcards
Define the term ‘conformity’
Changes in an individuals behaviour and/or beliefs due to real or imagined group pressure
What are the 3 types of conformity?
-compliance
-identification
-internalisation
Describe compliance as a type of conformity (3)
-this is most superficial and least permanent change in attitude
-individuals publicly change their beliefs and behaviours to go along with a group and fit in, but in private, revert back to their original belief systems when the group pressure stops. they might not agree with what he group is doing
-Compliance is linked to NSI
Describe identification as a type of conformity (3)
-this is a stronger type of conformity involving possible private as well as public acceptance
-this occurs when individuals look to a group for guidance and adjust their behaviour and beliefs because membership of the group is seen as desirable and they take on a role within the group
-when the group is no longer seen as valuable, behaviour might revert back
Describe internalisation as a type of conformity (3)
-this is the deepest and most permanent change in attitude
-individuals publicly and privately change their behaviours/belief systems to be in line with the group norm, because we accept their attitudes into our own cognitions (internalise them), behaviour lasts when the majority is no longer present
-internalisation is linked to ISI
Define the term Informational Social Influence (3 marks)
-ISI is driven by the desire to be right
-when an individual is unsure (lacks knowledge) about how to behave, they conform by seeking information from the group about how to behave and assume that it is right
-this is a cognitive process and links to internalisation
Define the term Normative Social Influence (3 marks)
-NSI is driven by the desire to be liked
-an individual will ‘go along’ with a groups behaviour in order to avoid ridicule, gain acceptance and fit in
-this is an emotional process and links to compliance
who conducted research for ISI as an explanation for conformity?
Jenness
Who’s aim was to investigate conformity to majority influence in an unambiguous situation?
Jenness
Evaluate ISI as an explanation for conformity (summarise)
RTS - Jenness asked ppts to estimate jellybeans in a jar privately, told a group estimate and then a final private estimate. Second estimate was significantly closer to the group estimate
HOWEVER this research lacks ecological validity because it took place in a lab (artificial environment + is difficult to generalise the findings to real life as individuals are more likely to conform in a lab because no consequences
Give Research To Support ISI as an explanation of conformity (8)
-3 marks for the definition of ISI
-conducted by Jenness
-asked ppts to individually estimate the number of jellybeans in a jar, then gathered and shared a group estimate then gave them a second private estimate & second estimate was significantly closer to the group estimate
-supports ISI because the task was ambiguous and they were unsure about how to behave so conformed by seeking information from the group.
-individuals changed their estimate publicly and privately to be right
Give a counterarguement for ISI as an explanation of conformity
lacks ecological validity as it takes place in an artificial environment (lab) so it is difficult to generalise the findings to real life because in a lab there isn’t consequences for your actions like there is in real life which reduces external validity
Evaluate NSI as an explanation of conformity
RTS - Asch- ppts were asked if line a, b or c was the most similar in length to the stimulus line (x). confederates answered first and gave the wrong answer. ppts answered last or second to last and conformed 37% of the time. This supports NSI as the task was unambiguous and ppts stated they knew the answer but changed it to avoid ridicule
HOWEVER
It is gender bias because only males were tested so it is difficult to generalise the findings to women as they might be more conformist as they are more concerned about social roles and being liked by their peers (Neto,1995). NSI explains conformity for females more than for males
Give both arguements for the evaluation of ISI as an explanation for conformity
RTS- Jenness, changed estimate of number of jellybeans in the jar
However, it lacks ecological validity as it took place in a lab
Give both arguements to evaluate NSI as an explanation of conformity
RTS- Asch’s ppts conformed 37% of the time when the wrong answer was said even though they knew it was wrong
However, it is gender bias as it used a male only sample and Neto suggested women will conform more
What was the aim of Asch’s conformity research?
to investigate the effects of a majority on an individuals judgement