Memory- Eye Witness Testimonies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the 2 factors affecting EWT’s?

A

-misleading information
-anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 types of misleading information?

A

-leading questions
-post event discussions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a leading question (1)?

A

-a question that wrongly implies something about an event or crime, such as ‘what colour was the youth’s jacket?’ which implies that the perpetrator was a youth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do leading questions affect the accuracy of EWT? (1)

A

-is implied in the question contaminates the witnesses memory and therefore witnesses recall inaccurate information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the aim of Loftus & Palmer’s research into leading questions

A

-to investigate whether the phrasing of a question can affect ppts memory of an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the method of Loftus & Palmer’s research into leading questions

A

Lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe the sample in Loftus & Palmer’s research into leading questions

A

45 American students (split into 5 groups of 9)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the procedure of Loftus & Palmer’s research into leading questions

A

-all 45 ppts were shown a video of a car crash and each group was asked a leading question with a different verb (IV)
-the verbs were smashed, collided, bumped, hit and contacted
-they were asked how fast were the cars travelling when they (verb) each other?
-Loftus & Palmer measured ppts estimated speed in MPH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the verbs in Loftus & Palmer’s research into leading questions and what is an acronym for this?

A

-Smashed, Collided, Bumped, Hit, Contacted
- Simon Cowell Bit His Cat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the findings of Loftus & Palmer’s research into leading questions

A

-they found ppts guessed a higher mean speed when they had ‘smashed’ (40.5 mph) compared to ‘contacted’ (31.8mph)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the conclusion of Loftus & Palmer’s research into leading questions

A

The phrasing of a question can influence a participants memory of an event, decreasing the accuracy of EWT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluate leading questions as a factor affecting EWT

A

-has practical applications (cognitive interviews)
-if witness statements are more accurate, this could lead to quicker convictions of criminals which could improve the economy
-Loftus & Palmer’s research lacks mundane realism as there was an artificial task of watching a video of a car crash

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is meant by post event discussion? (1)

A

Where witnesses of an event/ crime discuss their accounts with each other after the event has occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does post event discussions affect the accuracy of EWT?

A

Reduces it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the two types of post event discussion?

A

-memory contamination
-memory conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe memory contamination

A

-when co-witnesses to a crime discuss it with each other, their EWT may become altered/distorted
-this is because they combine (mis)information from other witnesses with their own memories suggesting that their memories of events have changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe memory conformity

A

-witnesses go along with each other either to win social approval (NSI) or because they believe the other witnesses is right and they are wrong (ISI)
-however, unlike with memory contamination, their memory remains unchanged but the accuracy of recall has been affected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Evaluate post event discussion as a type of misleading information

A

-RTS- Skagerberg and Wright- showed a video of a mugging with two different hair colours
-lacks ecological validity as it was conducted in a controlled environment (lab)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe Skagerberg and Wright’s research into post event discussions

A

-showed ppts 2 versions of a film clip of a mugging, in one the mugger had dark brown hair and in the other he had light brown hair
-they discussed the clip in pairs but each person watched a different version
-it was found that they suggested the mugger had medium brown hair instead of dark or light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is meant by anxiety in terms of EWTs? (1)

A

Anxiety is a string emotional and physical state that affects EWT

21
Q

How does anxiety affect the accuracy of EWT? (1)

A

Extreme anxiety has been found to negatively affect EWT as witnesses only focus on certain aspects of the event so their recall is limited

22
Q

Who conducted research into anxiety as a factor affecting EWT?

A

Johnson & Scott

23
Q

Describe the aim of Johnson & Scott’s research into anxiety as a factor affecting EWTs

A

To investigate the effects of anxiety on the accuracy of EWT

24
Q

What was the method of Johnson & Scott’s research into anxiety as a factor affecting EWT

A

Laboratory experiment

25
Q

What was the procedure of Johnson & Scott’s research into anxiety as a factor affecting EWT

A

-all ppts were told to wait outside a room before the experiment began
-ppts were placed in 1 of 2 conditions (either a high anxiety ‘weapon focus’ condition OR low anxiety condition)
-HIGH ANXIETY CONDITION- ‘weapon focus’ - ppts heard an argument and the sound of breaking glass from within the room and a man walked out of the room carrying a knife covered in blood
-LOW ANXIETY CONDITION- ppts heard an arguement from within the room before a man walked out with grease in their hands and a pen
-ppts had to identify the person who left the room from 50 photographs (DV)

26
Q

Describe the findings of Johnson & Scott’s research into anxiety as a factor affecting EWT

A

-ppts in the low anxiety condition correctly identified the man leaving the room 49% of the time
-ppts in the high anxiety condition correctly identified the man leaving the room 33% of the time

27
Q

What is the conclusion of Johnson & Scott’s research into anxiety as a factor affecting EWT

A

Anxiety caused a ‘weapon focus’ as the witness concentrates on the weapon not the person because of the fear of the situation, reducing accuracy of eyewitness recall

28
Q

Evaluate anxiety as a factor affecting the accuracy of EWT

A
  • RTS-Valentine & Mesout- took part in a high anxiety event and were immediately asked to recall physical details
    -RTC- Christianson & Hubinette- interviewed witnesses of a real life bank robbery and recall was more accurate when directly threatened
    -HOWEVER- they interviewed ppts over several months and had no control over what happened in the intervening time
29
Q

Describe Valentine & Mesout’s research into the negative effect of anxiety as a factor affecting EWT

A

-researchers used an objective measure (heart rate) to divide participants into high and low anxiety groups
-ppts took part in the London dungeon labyrinth (a high anxiety event ) and then were immediately asked to recall physical details of the actor from the event
-high anxiety lowered the accuracy of the EWT significantly

30
Q

Who conducted research to contradict Johnson & Scott’s research

A

Christianson & Hubinette

31
Q

Describe Christianson & Hubinette’s research into anxiety

A
  • interviewed 58 real life witnesses of a bank robbery where some had been directly threatened (high anxiety) and others were bystanders
    -it was found that recall was more than 75% accurate across all witnesses but those who were threatened had even more accurate recall
32
Q

Give a weakness of Christianson & Hubinette’s research into anxiety

A
  • interviewed ppts several months after the event and had no control over what happened between this period
    -For example, participants may have discussed the event with each other
    -The effect of anxiety may have been overwhelmed by the factors such as post event discussion
    -Reduces the validity
33
Q

Describe how Yerkes-Dodson Law can affect anxiety as a factor affecting the accuracy of EWT

A

-proposes anxiety and the accuracy of EWT is not a simple relationship
-For example, too little or too much anxiety would result in poor EWT RECALL
-If you reach an optimum level of anxiety, the accuracy of EWT is high

34
Q

What is a cognitive interview?

A

-a technique used by police to interview witnesses after they have seen a crime or accident to help facilitate the most accurate and detailed memory possible
-lots of ‘open’ questions are asked wheee the witness is not interrupted and free to expand on their own answers

35
Q

Compare a standard interview to a cognitive interview (3)

A

-cognitive interviews have open ended questions WHEREAS standard interviews have closed direct questions
-cognitive interviews are not interrupted WHEREAS standard interviews are often interrupted
-cognitive interviews have more retrieval paths WHEREAS standard interviews have less retrieval paths

36
Q

What techniques are used in a cognitive interview?

A

-recall everything
-context reinstatement
-recall in reverse order
-recall from changed perspective

37
Q

Describe recall everything in a cognitive interview

A

-the witness is asked to report all details of the event even if it seems irrelevant

38
Q

How does recall everything in a cognitive interview improve EWTs?

A

-the recall of one piece of information might act as a trigger to memory recall of other key information

39
Q

Give an example of a question used in a cognitive interview to recall everything?

A

“Start from the beginning, what happened the morning of the robbery?”

40
Q

Describe context reinstatement in a cognitive interview

A

-The witness is asked to mentally place themselves back at the scene of the event and imagine the environment such as
-the weather
-what they could see
-and their emotions

41
Q

How will context reinstatement improve EWTs?

A

-uses content and state dependent cues to help trigger memories if the event that may appear forgotten but are not currently accessible due to retrieval failure

42
Q

Give an example of a question used in a cognitive interview for context reinstatement

A

“Close your eyes… what do you see, what’s the weather like, what was x wearing, how were you feeling when…”

43
Q

Describe recall in reverse order in a cognitive interview

A

-the witness asked to report what happened in a different chronological order, for example from the end of the crime to the start

44
Q

How will recall in reverse order improve EWTs?

A

-prevent witnesses reporting what they expected to happen (schema) rather than what happened
-it also prevents dishonesty as it is harder to lie when having to reverse a story

45
Q

Give an example of a question used a cognitive interview for recall in reverse order

A

“Tell us what happened from when you entered the bank”

46
Q

Describe recall from a changed perspective in cognitive interview

A

-the witness is asked to recall the incident from another persons perspective who witnessed the crime
-e.g another witness or the perpetrator

47
Q

How will recall from a changed perspective improve EWTs?

A

-may prevent witnesses reporting what they expected to happen (schema) rather than what happened

48
Q

Give an example of a question used in a cognitive interview for recall from a changed perspective

A

“Imagine you’re the bank robber… what do you see”