Social influence and social change Flashcards
What is social change?
The process by which minorities change the attitudes of whole societies so that new social norms are created.
What are the steps of social change?
1) drawing attention
2) consistency
3) Deeper processing
4) augumentation principle
5) snowball effect- slow conversion of a few people who then influence others, ( conversion happens at a faster rate)
6) social cryptomesia - forgetting how new social norms were adopted and who they came from
Lessons from conformity research
Asch’s research- dissent has potential to lead to social change
environmental & health campaigns exploit conformity processes by appealing to NSI
» provide information about what other people are doing (majority)
-those who go against norm risk rejection
Lessons from obedience research
Milgram - importance of disobedient role models e.g. C refuses to give shock obedience levels in naïve p’s decreased
Zimbardo- obedience can create social change through the process of gradual commitment
small instruction obeyed= difficult to resist bigger one ‘drift’ into new behaviour
Research support for normative influences
Nolan- aimed to see if they could change peoples energy habits
-hung messages on front doors of house
-key message was that most residents were trying to reduce energy levels
Control- had messages that asked them to just save energy
-Significant decrease in energy from first group than 2nd
Limitation is that deeper processing may not play a role in how minority bring about social change . why?
Mackie - majority influence creates deeper processing if you do not share their views
When we find a majority believes something different we are forced to think long and hard about their arguments and
reasoning
-central element of MI challenged > casts doubt on its validity
What can you also use to evaluate how social influence leads to social change?
Methodological issues of Milgram, Asch and Moscovici study
Explain limitation that people still resist social change?
-Bashir et al- found that p’s were less likely to behave in environmentally friendly ways
-did not want to be associated with stereotypical & minority
‘environmentalists’
-describe them in negative ways ( tree-huggers)
-MI not always positive