Social influence and social change Flashcards
What is social change?
- The process by which minorities change the attitudes of whole societies so that new social norms are created as result of social influence, conformity, obedience & minority influence
What are the steps of social change in minority influence?
1) drawing attention (marches, protest)
2) consistency (same message over years)
3) Deeper processing (people think deeply about the status quo)
4) augmentation principle (freedom riders beaten)
5) snowball effect- slow conversion of a few people who then influence others (MLK got attention of US government)
6) social cryptomnesia - forgetting how new social norms were adopted and who they came from (south is a different place but people have no memory of the change)
What are the lessons from conformity research?
- Asch’s research- dissent has potential to lead to social change e.g. confederate gave correct answers which broke power of majority
- environmental & health campaigns exploit conformity processes by appealing to NSI e.g. normative messages such as ‘bin it others do it’
» provide information about what other people are doing (majority) - those who go against norm risk rejection
What are the lessons from obedience research?
- Milgram - importance of disobedient role models e.g. confederate refused to give shock > obedience levels in naïve p’s decreased
- Zimbardo> obedience can create social change through the process of gradual commitment
once a small instruction is obeyed= difficult to resist bigger one so people ‘drift’ into new behaviour
What is a strength of social influence research?
- research support for normative influences
- Nolan et al > aimed to see if they could change peoples energy use habits
- researchers hung messages on front doors of houses in San Diego every week for a month
- key message was that most residents were trying to reduce energy levels >control (had messages that asked them to just save energy)
- Significant decrease in energy from first group than control group
- shows conformity (majority influence) can lead to social change > increased validity
What is a limitation of minority influence bringing about social change?
- deeper processing may not play a role in how minorities bring about social change
- Mackie disagrees that people convert views because they think deeply about the minorities view
- presents evidence that it is majority influence that creates deeper processing if you do not share their views
- When we find a majority believes something different we are forced to think long & hard about their arguments and reasoning
- central element of MI challenged > casts doubt on its validity as explanation for social change
What can you also use to evaluate how social influence leads to social change?
Methodological issues of Milgram, Asch and Moscovici study
What is another limitation of social influence research?
- people can still resist social change
- Bashir et al> found that p’s were less likely to behave in environmentally friendly ways as they did not want to be associated with stereotypical & minority
‘environmentalists’ - described them in negative ways (tree-huggers)
- MI not always positive as it can be off putting to outsider