Obedience Flashcards

1
Q

What is obedience?

A

A form of social influence in which an individual follows a direct order. Person issuing order is usually a figure of authority who has power to punish when obedient behaviour is not forthcoming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who designed a procedure to test obedience?

A

Milgram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline Milgram’s baseline procedure

A
  • 40 males volunteered to take part
    -randomly assigned P’s to role of ‘learner’ or ‘teacher’ ( actually fixed)
    -Naïve participant always got role of teacher
  • an experimenter was also involved dressed in a grey lab coat
    -experimenter ordered P’s to give a strong shock to learner located in another room (15-450V fake)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were Milgram’s baseline findings?

A

-all P’s delivered shocks to 300 V
-12.5% stopped at 300 volts
-65% continued to 450V
- also collected qualitative data using observations
- P’s showed signs of extreme tensions e.g. sweat. tremble, seizure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Other data of Milgram’s study

A
  • before study Milgram asked 14 psychology students to predict the participants behaviour , estimated 3% will go to 450V
    -P’s in baseline were debriefed, in follow up questionnaire 84% happy to have taken part
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were Milgram’s conclusions?

A

-that German people are not ‘different’.
-The American participants in his study were willing to obey orders even if they might harm another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What ethical issues were in Milgram’s study?

A

-p’s were deceived
-thought the allocation of teacher and learner was random but in fact it was fixed
-also thought the shocks were real
-Led p’s to feel psychologically distressed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a counterpoint for the ethical issues in Milgram’s study?

A

-behaviour would not be natural if they knew aims
-could be argued the benefits outweigh the costs
-Milgram’s studies can be justified on the grounds of what we have learnt
‘the dangers of blind obedience’
-Milgram also debriefed his p’s & 84% said they were glad to have participated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What research support is there for Milgram’s study?

A

-Findings replicated in a French documentary
-focused on a game show made especially for the programme
-p’s in game believed they were contestants in pilot episode for new show
-paid to give fake electric shock(ordered by presenter) to other p’s (actors) in front of studio audience
-80% delivered maximum shock of 460V to unconscious man
-behaviour identical to Milgram’s e.g. nail biting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why does Milgram’s study have low internal validity?

A

-may have not been testing what it intended to test
-Orne & Holland argued p’s behaved the way they did because they didn’t believe set up -‘play-acting’
-Perry, listened to tapes of Milgram’s p’s & reported that only about 1/2 believed shocks were real
-2/3 of them were disobedient
-p’s may have been responding to demand characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why does Milgram’s study lack population validity?

A

-Milgram used 40 white, American males
-findings cannot be generalised to other populations e.g. females
-not known whether females would also show high levels of obedience to authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly