Conformity: Types & explanations Flashcards
1
Q
Who suggested that there are three ways people conform?
A
Kelman
2
Q
What is internalisation?
A
- deep type of conformity where a person genuinely accepts the group norms as it has become apart of their value system
- private as well as public change in opinions
- change usually permanent> attitudes internalised
- change persists even in absence of other group members
3
Q
What is identification?
A
- A moderate type of conformity where we conform to the opinions/behaviours of a group because we value the group & want to be a part of it
- leads to a public change in behaviour to be accepted by group but privately disagree with what the group believes
4
Q
What is compliance?
A
- A temporary & superficial type of conformity where we go along with others in public but privately not changing personal opinions/and or behaviour
- behaviour stops when group pressure stops
5
Q
Who developed the two-process theory for explaining why people conform?
A
Deutsch and Gerald
6
Q
What is informational social influence?
A
- An explanation of conformity that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because we feel that they are right
- Leads to internalisation, a permanent change in beliefs
- more likely to occur in situations that are new to a person or ambiguous
7
Q
What is normative social influence?
A
- An explanation for conformity that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because of the need to be liked
- This may lead to compliance -temporary change in opinions/behaviour
- more pronounced in stressful situations
8
Q
What research support is there for NSI as an explanation for conformity?
A
- e.g. Asch interviewed his participants
- some said they conformed because they felt self-conscious giving the correct answer & were afraid of disapproval
- when p’s wrote answers down conformity fell to 12.5%
answer privately=no normative group pressure - shows conformity is due to desire not to be rejected by the group for disagreeing
9
Q
What research support is there for ISI as an explanation for conformity?
A
- Lucas eat al study
- found p’s conformed more often to incorrect answers they were given when maths problems were difficult
- when problems were easy, p’s knew their own minds but when it was hard=situations became ambiguous
- did not want to be wrong so relied on answers given
- ISI= valid explanation
10
Q
What is a counterpoint for research support for ISI?
A
- often unclear whether it is NSI or ISI at work in research studies or real life
- e.g. Asch found conformity reduced when there is one other dissenting p> reduce power of NSI (social support)
- may also reduce power of ISI ( provide alternative source of social information)
- hard to separate ISI & NSI as both probably operate together in most real world situations
11
Q
What is a weakness of NSI explanation?
A
- does not predict conformity in every case
- some ppl are greatly concerned with being liked by others (nAffiliators) > want to relate to others
- McGhee & Teevan found that students who were nAffiliators were more likely to conform
- there are individual differences in conformity that can not be fully explained by one theory