Social influence and change (VL 6) Flashcards
Forms of social influence
- Obedience to authority, commands
- Power
- Compliance with requests and internalized conformity to group norms
- Minority group influence
Informal and normative conformity
Informal conformity:
change in opinions occurs as a result of a desire for accurate knowledge, result: private acceptance or real change in opinions on the part of the individual
Normative conformity:
we express opinions or behave in ways that help us to be accepted/keep us from being isolated or rejected by a group; result: public compliance involves a change in behavior that is not accompanied by change in one´s private opinion
What type of Group are People easier influenced by?
Reference Groups
because they are psychologically significant for our behavior and attitudes (than by membership groups, as we belong to them by an external criterion)
What is obedience affected by?
- The proximity and legitimacy of authority
- The proximity of the victim
- The degree of social support for obedience or disobedience
- -> We all have the potential to obey commands blindly, even if it consequently includes harm to others
Milgram´s studies on obedience to authority
- Electric shocks, how far can a person presented as authority produce obedience (even if others are harmed)
- Different variations, participant has to give learner an electric shock if an answer is incorrect
- Results: Changes in the situation dramatically influence the amount of conformity
Why do people conform to a group?
- To feel sure about the objective validity of their perceptions and opinions
- To obtain social approval and avoid social disapproval
- To express or validate their social identity as members of a specific Group
- -> We all tend to yield to the (group) majority –> powerful source of conformity
When is conformity reduced?
Conformity is reduced, when:
- people are not under surveillance and tasks are unambiguous (yet residual conformity exists often)
- Lack of unanimity (Einvernehmen) within the group/majority
Majority and Minority influence
Majority influence:
When a larger number of individuals in the current social group attempt to change the opinions or behaviors of a smaller number of individuals
Minority influence:
When the minority attempts to change the majority
Solomon Asch´s Line Perception Studies
Task:
Relatively easy, compare different lines in size
Results:
- When tested alone, participants didn´t make any mistakes
- In a group, if the confederates gave the same wrong answer before the participant´s turn, the participants sometimes repeated this incorrect answer
- 76% of 123 men gave at least one incorrect response, 24% never conformed –> no absolute conformity
Groups dynamics approach, basic assumption
There is general pressure towards similarity in groups
Social Impact - Definition
- Is the increase in the amount of conformity that is produced by each new member added to the group
- Is greater for initial majority members than it is for later members
Experiment by Milgram, Bickman and Berkowitz
If people look up to the sky, how many people are influenced and consequently look up in the sky as well?
- Influence of each additional confederate went down and it converged to a group of 6 people
- -> after reaching a group of 6, the impact of an additional group member was
- -> confirms social impact theory
- -> conformity is only increased up to a certain point by increasing the size of the majority
Principal of optimal distinctiveness
When there are a lot of people in the majority, people feel the need to maintain their individual identity (by not conforming to the group)
The consistency of unanimity (Einstimmigkeit/Einvernehmen) of the group members
- Is even more important than the size of the majority
- In Asch´s study conformity occurred not just because confederates gave a wrong answer, but because they gave the same wrong answer (when one of 16 gave a different answer, conformity was reduced to 5%)
Why is unanimity such an important determinant of consistency?
- People do not want to be the first to give a different opinion as they stand alone and might embarrass themselves
- People become less sure of their judgement, when there is complete agreement amongst everyone else –> informational conformity
- As soon as the individual has someone else who agrees with him/her, the need to conform is no longer given -> more supporters who challenge the Status Quo validates one´s opinion, disagreeing is less fearful