Prosocial behavior (VL 12) Flashcards
Prosocial behavior - Definition
A broad category that refers to all acts positively valued by society (includes Helping and altruistic behavior)
Helping behavior
Refers to intentional acts designed to benefit another person, regardless of the motive (includes altruistic behavior)
Altruistic behavior
Refers to behaviors motivated by the desire to benefit another with no expectation of personal gain or reward
Evolutionary social psychology/biological approach
Genes and Instincts, natural selection
- Kin selection: behaviors that help a genitive relative a re favored by natural selection
- Norm of reciprocity: Helping others will increase the likelihood that they will help us in the future
- Those who have a competitive advantage are the best learners of societal norms (Simon 1990)
Social learning theory approach
- Social exchange theory: Much of what we do stems from the desire to maximize our outcomes and minimize our costs
- Rewards of helping: increase the probability that someone will help us in return, relieve the personal distress of a bystander, gain us social approval and increased self-worth
- Helping can be costly and decreases when costs are high
Integrative approach
combines aspects of the previous approaches and focuses on arousal and empathy
Empathy-altruism Hypothesis (Batson)
When we feel empathy for a person, we will attempt to help purely for altruistic reasons, regardless of what we have to gain
Differences in prosocial behavior
Urban vs. Rural
People in rural areas are more helpful
- Explanation 1: People from rural settings are brought up to be more neighborly and more likely to trust strangers
- Explanation 2: Urban overload hypothesis by Milgram, people living in cities are likely to keep to themselves in order to being overloaded by all the stimulation they receive
Bystander effect
The greater the number of bystanders who witness an emergency the less likely any of them is to help
Good Samaritan study by Darley and Batson
Participants were either told to hurry across campus or take their time, those not in a hurry were way more likely to help a stranger on the way and only 10% of those in a hurry helped
Step-by-Step model by Latané and Darley to decide whether to help a stranger
- Notice the event (no help if distracted or in a hurry)
- Interpret the event as an emergency (no help if pluralistic ignorance – interpret the event as a nonemergency)
- Assume responsibility (no help if diffusion of responsibility – fail to assume personal responsibility)
- Know appropriate form of assistance (no help if lack of knowledge and lack of competence)
- Implement decision (no help if danger to self, legal concerns, embarrassment)
Pluralistic ignorance
Phenomenon where bystanders assume that nothing is wrong in an emergency because no one else looks concerned
Diffusion of responsibility
Phenomenon where each bystander´s sense of responsibility to help decreases as the number of witnesses increases
Audience inhibition/fear of social blunders
The dread of acting inappropriately or of making a foolish mistake witnessed by others
Cultural differences in prosocial behavior:
- People across cultures are more likely to help members of their ingroup
- People from collectivist cultures are more prone to help in-group members and less likely to help out-group members than people from individualist cultures