Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

psychology AS > social influence > Flashcards

social influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards AP® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

What does milgrams (1963) study demonstrate

A

Obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is obedience

A

This is the change of an individuals behaviour to comply with a demand by an authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the method of milgrams experiment

A

Milgram recruited 40 male volunteers who we led to believe that they were participating in a study to improve learning and memory
The participants were shown how to use a device which gave electric shock to another participant who was really a confederate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What percentage of participants continued to shock the participant up to the maximum voltage (450 volts )

A

65% at this point the learner was unresponsive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the percentage when the setting of the experiment was moved to an office building

A

The highest shock rate dropped to 48%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the shock rate when the learner was in the same room as the teacher

A

The highest shock rate dropped to 40%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the highest shock rate when the teacher and the learners hands were touching

A

The highest shock rate dropped to 30%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the highest shock rate when the researcher gave the orders by phone

A

The rate dropped to 23%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the variations show of milgrams experiment show

A

They showed that when the humanity of the person being shocked was increased, obedience decreased
Similarly , when the authority of the experimenter deceased , so did obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the pros of milgrams experiment

A

Strict variables -variables could be controlled because the experiment was done in a laboratory. We should be able to establish the cause and effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the cons of milgrams study

A
  • low ecological validity = participants were on an artificial situation ( they wouldn’t naturally be in a situation of shocking people. This means the study has low ecological validity ( can’t be generalised easily)
  • deception - participants weren’t able to give informed consent because they didn’t know the real nature of the experiment . They weren’t told they could withdraw
    -lack of protection - participants were visibly stressed during the study
    In Milgram’s defend , no formal ethical guidelines existed at the time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was milgram experiment influenced by

A

Trial of Adolf Eichmann

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is another reason as to why people obey and comply

A

They are concerned about a consequence if they don’t comply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an agentic state

A

This is a state in which an individual behaves as if the agent of another person. This allows them to deny responsibility for their action and distance themselves from the consequence of those actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What two states did milgram suggest that people can be in

A
  • autonomous state = when people have control and act according to their own wishes
  • agentic state =when people obey an authority figure , they give up some free will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is an agentic shift

A

When individuals shift from the autonomous to agentic state
Eg in milgrams study the participants started the experiment in autonomous state but shifted into the agentic state when they started taking orders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What three factors did milgram say caused his participants to stay in the agentic state

A

1 insistence of authority- the experimenter told them to continue when they showed signs of stress
2 pressure of location - the study was conducted in a university. Participants would see the experimenter as a legimate authority
3 unwillingness to disrupt - participants might have felt like they couldn’t stop the experiment
Because they had already been paid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What three factors can affect the likelihood of a person being obedient to authority

A

Proximity , location and uniforms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How does proximity affect obedience

A

How physically close individuals are to the consequences of their actions affects how much they feel compelled to follow orders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Explain an example of how proximity can affect obedience

A
  • milgram found that when the teacher and the leaner were in the same room , and the Teacher could see the distress, obedience dropped to 40%
  • when the teacher was instructed to take the hand of the learner and place it on a metal plate and receive the shock , obedience levels dropped to 30%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How can location affect obedience

A

Locations such as prestigious universities or government buildings add to the legitimacy of the authority figure. Obedience rates are higher in institutional settings and are deemed to have a legitimacy all of their own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is an example of how the location can affect obedience

A

When milgram carried out his study at the prestigious Yale university, obedience levels were higher than when he moved the experiment to a office block in a run down part of town (62.5%-47.5%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How can uniforms affect obedience

A

Uniforms such as those worn by police officers add further legitimacy of an authority figure. This means that means that people are more likely go obey people wearing a uniform as we have been socialised from young that they are high on the hierarchy table

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is an example of how uniform can affect obedience

A

Bickman carries out a study where ordinary people were told to pick up litter on a New York street ,loan a coin to a stranger of move away from a bus
Only 14% of people obeyed an individual dressed as
a milk,am , whilst 38% obeyed a person Westinghouse a security guards uniform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What idea did Adorno et al (1950) propose

A

An authoritarian personality - our personality stems from early childhood experiences and influences , especially parents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Which type of people are more likely to have an authoritarian personality

A

Children raised in strict households are thought to be more likely to develop authoritarian personality type than others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

In milgrams study what happened when two confederates paired with real participants left saying they would discontinue

A

Only 10% of participants gave the maximum 450- volts shock

So the creation of disobedient group norms puts more pressure on participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What does locus of control mean

A

The extent to which people think they’re in control of their own lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What does internal locus of control

A

The belief that things happen as a result of our choices and decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What is external locus of control

A

The belief that things happen because of luck, fate or other external forces beyond the control of the individual
Individuals with an internal locus of control are less likely to conform than those with an external locus of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is not a factor affecting conformity

A

Self perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What was a minority influence

A

Refers to a type of social influence where individuals reject established majority group norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What does conversion mean

A

A process where the minority gradually adopt a new minority’s viewpoint or behaviour. This new belief or behaviour becomes accepted publically and privately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What type of conformity is conversion

A

Internalisation, And happens through informational social influence. This means that the minority provide new information and ideas to the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Why does minority influence take longer to achieve than majority influence

A

Because majority influence is based on compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What is the name for the process by which a new behaviour is accepted

A

Conversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

How can a minority influence bring about a behavioural change

A

Consistency , commitment and flexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

How can a minority influence be consistent

A

Be consistent in both their opinions and behaviour. This indicates that the minority are committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

How can a minority influence show commitment

A

Commitment is seen as stronger if the minority has had to resist social pressure and abuse because of their viewpoint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

How can a minority influence show flexibility

A

Cons isn’t minority’s that are inflexible and are not persuasive
Those who are flexible ( moderate , co operative and reasonable ) are seem as persuasive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What does consistency and commitment lead to

A

Doubt in established norms

42
Q

What does the code of ethics address

A
  • a participant has the right to withdraw from the research
  • the need to get fully informed consent from the participants
  • the use of deception
  • the importance of protecting participants from the risk of psychological and physical harm
43
Q

What was the aim of Milgrams debriefing

A

This was an opportunity for him to explain the true purpose of the study and what has really happened. It was intended to make the participants feel better about their role in the study, especially if they had been completely obedient throughout

44
Q

What was the rate of obedience in the proximity variations

A
  • When the learner and the teacher were in the same room obedience dropped from 65% to 40%
  • when the teacher forced the Learners hand on the plate = obedience dropped further to 30%
  • when instructions were made my telephone obedience dropped to 20.5%
45
Q

What was the rate of obedience in the location variations

A

-run down building rather than a prestigious Yale uni where it was originally obedience fell to 47.5% from 65%

46
Q

What was the rate of obedience in the uniform variation

A

The role of the experimenter was taken over by an ‘ ordinary member of the public ‘ ( played by a confederate ) in everyday clothes rather than a lab coat. The obedience rate dropped to 20% lowest of these variations

47
Q

Pros of milgrams variation

A
  • cross cultural application - his finding have been replicated in other cultures. For example Miranda et al found an obedience rate of over 90% amonngst Spanish students. This suggests that milgrams conclusions about obedience are not limited to American males but are valid across cultures and apply to females
  • control of variables
48
Q

Cons of milgrams variations

A
  • lack of internal validity - participants realised the procedure was faked such as the experimenter that was a “ member of the public “. This is a limitation as it isn’t clear whether the results are genuinely due to the operation of obedience or the participants worked it out
49
Q

What does legitimacy of authority mean

A

An explanation for obedience which suggests that we are more likely to obey people who we perceive to have authority over us. This authority is justified ( legitimate ) by the individuals position of power within a social hierarchy

50
Q

What is the definition of autonomous state

A

This is the opposite of agentic state. A person in this state is free to behave according to their own principles and therefore feel a sense of responsibility over their own actions

51
Q

What is an agentic shift

A

Milgram suggested that this occurs when a person perceives someone as a figure of authority. This other person has power because of their position in a social hierarchy

52
Q

Evaluation of agentic state

A

+ research support= blass and Schmitt found that people do blame and legitimate authority for the participants behaviour

  • limited explanation =can not explain why some of milgrams participants disobeyed or the lack of moral strain in Hofling et al’s nurses
53
Q

Evaluation of legitimacy of authority

A

+ cultural differences = explains obedience in different cultures because reflects different social hierarchies

54
Q

What is an authoritarian personality

A

A type of personality that adorno argued was especially susceptible to obeying people in authority. Such individuals are also thought to be submissive to those of higher status and dismissive of inferiors

55
Q

What was the procedure in adorno et al study

A

They investigated the cause of the obedient personality in the study of more 2000 middle class, white Americans and their unconscious attitudes towards racial groups.they developed ways to investigate this including the F scale

56
Q

What was adorno a findings

A
  • those who scores high on the F scale identifies with strong people
  • authoritarian people had a cognitive style where there was no ‘ fuzziness’ between categories of people with fixed and distinctive stereotypes about other groups
57
Q

List some authoritarian characteristics

A
  • especially obedient to authority
  • extreme respect for authority and submissive to it
  • believe we need strong and powerful leaders to enforce traditional values such as love of country and religion
58
Q

What is the origin authoritarian personality

A

They concluded that it formed in childhood as a result of harsh parenting. Typically the parenting style identified by adorno is extremely strict discipline, impossibly high standards , severe criticism

59
Q

Pro of authoritarian personality

A
  • research support = some of milgrams obedient participants had authoritarian personalities ( elms )
60
Q

Cons of authoritarian personality

A
  • limited explaination = can’t increase in obedience across a whole culture
  • political bias = equates authoritarian personality with right wing ideology and ignores extreme left wing authoritarianism
61
Q

Definition of resistance to social norms

A

Refers to the ability of people to withstand the social pressure to conform to the majority or to obey authority.

62
Q

Definition of social support

A

The presence of people who resist pressures to conform or obey can help others to do the same

63
Q

Social support in terms of conformity

A

Social support can help people resist conformity. The pressure to conform can be reduced

64
Q

social support in terms of obedience

A

Social support can help resist obedience. The pressure to obey can be reduced if there is another person who is seen to disobey

65
Q

Resistance to social support in terms of locus of control

A

People who have an internal LOC are more likely to be able to resist pressures to conform or obey. Another explanation is that people with a high internal locus of control tend to be more self confident and have less a need for social approval. These personality traits lead to greater resistance to social influence

66
Q

Definition of minority influence

A

A form of social influence in which minority of people persuade others to adopt their belief , attitudes and behaviours. Leads to internalisation of conversion

67
Q

What does minority influence involve

A
  • consistency - minority influence is most effective if the minority keep the same beliefs over time and with the individuals who form the minority
  • commitment - the minority influence is more powerful if the minority demonstrates dedication to their position
  • flexibility- relentless consistency could be counter productive if it is seen by the majority as unbending and unreasonable
68
Q

Why is consistency effective

A

Because it draws attention to the minority view

69
Q

How is commitment effective

A

Because it shows the minority is not acting out of self interest such as by making personal sacrifices

70
Q

How is flexibility effective

A

By accepting the possibility of compromise

71
Q

The process of change in minority influence

A

Snow ball effect - minority view gathers momentum until it becomes majority influence

72
Q

Evaluation of minority influence

A

+ research support- Moscovici study showed that a consistent minority opinion has a greater effect on other people than an inconsistent opinion ( emphasised the importance of consistency )

  • artificial tasks - ( such as aschs Line judgement task)
    Lacks in external validity and are limited in what they can tell us
73
Q

Definition of social influence

A

The process by which the individuals and groups each others attitudes and behaviours. Includes conformity, obedience and minority influence

74
Q

Definition of social change

A

This occurs when societies rather than just individuals adopt new attitudes ,beliefs and ways of doing things

75
Q

Stanford prison experiments procedure, findings and conclusions

A

Procedures - mock prison with students randomly assigned as guards or prisoners
Findings - guards became increasingly brutal, prisoners increasingly with drawn and depressed
Conclusions - participants conformed to their roles as guards or prisoners

76
Q

Evaluation of Stanford’s prison experiment

A
  • control = random assignment to roles increased internal validity
  • lack of realism = participants were playing-acting their roles according to media derived stereotypes
  • dispositional influence = only one third of guards were brutal so conclusions exaggerated
  • lack of research support + ethical issues
77
Q

Milgrams procedure and findings

A 
Procedure - participants have fake electric shocks to a “learner “in obedience to instructions from the “experimenter “
Findings - 
65% gave highest shock of 450v 
100% gave shocks up to 300v 
Many showed signs of anxiety
78
Q

Social support evaluation

A

Research support = conformity decreases when one person dissents even if they are not credible ( Allen and Levine )
Research support =obedience drops when disobedient role models are present ( Gamsen et al )

79
Q

What special role can minority influence play

A

Minority influence is powerful force for innovation and social change for example civil rights movement in the USA

80
Q

What lessons can be learnt from conformity research

A

Normative social influence can lead to social change by drawing attention to what the minority is doing

81
Q

research support for normative social influence

A

normative beliefs have an important role in shaping behaviours such as smoking and energy conservation. Linkenbach and perkins adolescents exposed to a message that the majority of the peers did not smoke were less likely to take up smoking themselves. This supports the claim that people shape their behaviours out of desire to fit in with the reference group

82
Q

research support for informational social influence

A

exposure to other peoples beliefs and opinions can shape many aspects of social behaviour and beliefs. Wittenbrenk and Henley found that individuals exposed to a negative viewpoint found that individuals to a negative viewpoint (about African Americans), represented as the majority, later reported the same negative attitudes to themselves. this shows the importance of informational social influence in shaping our attitudes and behaviours

83
Q

what does social influence mean

A

the study of how peoples behaviours and attitudes are influenced by the presence- actual or imagined-of other people

84
Q

what is a social group

A

two or more people who interact together and share things in common

85
Q

what are social roles

A

behaviours and beliefs expected of a person with a particular position in a social group

86
Q

what is a social norm

A

the unwritten rules for all members of a social group to behave

87
Q

what was the aim of zimbardos research study

A

to investigate if prison brutality happens because of the personality of the guards or prisoners or because they are conforming to social roles

88
Q

what is the process by which minority influence majority’s

A

conversion- this involves the majority internalising the attitudes of the minority

89
Q

how can you bring about social change through minority influence

A
  • cognitive conflict= a minority creates a conflict in the minds of the majority between what is currently believed and what the majority believe
  • snowball effect= minority influence normally has a small effect but this spreads more widely until it eventually leads to wide scale social change
90
Q

What three factors strengthen the influence of a minority

A

Consistency , flexibility and commitment

91
Q

Definition of social change

A

When minorities change attitudes to that new social norms are created

92
Q

What was the aim of moscovicis study

A

To investigate the role of a consistent minority upon the opinions of a majority in an unambiguous situation

93
Q

What was moscovicis procedure

A

Participants were put in groups of 6.in each group there were 4 participants and 2 can confederates.participants were told it was a study into perception. Each group was shown 36 blue slides varying the intensity of the colour. Inconsistent condition = confederates said 24 slides were green 12 were blue
Consistent = the confederates answers wrongly that the slides were green

94
Q

What was moscovicis findings

A

There were 8.2 % agreement with the minority in the consistent condition , with 32% agreeing at least once. There were only 1.25% agreement in the inconsistent condition

95
Q

What was moscovicis conclusion

A

Findings show that although minority influence is relatively small, consistency is the important variable

96
Q

Evaluation of moscovicis study

A
  • unethical = involves deceit which means informed consent was not given .particpants many have endured mild stress
  • female participants
    Does not identify important factors in minority influence like group size
97
Q

what are dispositional explanations for obedience

A

authoritarian personality

98
Q

evaluation of authoritarian personality

A

research by Middendorp and Meleon (1990) found that less-educated people are more likely to display authoritarian personality characteristics, than well-educated people. If these claims are correct then it is possible to conclude that it is not authoritarian personality characteristics that lead to obedience, but levels of education.

99
Q

describe social support in the context of resistance to social influence

A

One reason that people can resist the pressure to conform or obey is if they have an ally. Having an ally can build confidence and allow individuals to remain independent. Individuals who have support for their point of view no longer fear being ridiculed, allowing them to avoid normative social influence. Furthermore, individuals who have support for their point of view are more likely to disobey orders.

100
Q

describe locus of control for resistance to social influence

A

People with an internal locus of control believe that what happens in their life is largely the result of their own behaviour and that they have control over their life. Whereas people with an external locus of control believe that what happens to them is controlled by external factors and that they do not have complete control over their life.
Consequently, Rotter suggested that individuals with an internal locus of control are more likely to resist the pressures to conform or obey, in comparison to individuals with an external locus of control.

101
Q

research study for minority influence

A

Moscovici (1969) investigated behavioral styles (consistent / inconsistent) on minority influence in his blue-green studies. He showed that a consistent minority was more successful than an inconsistent minority in changing the views of the majority.

102
Q

evaluation for minority influence

A

The study used the lab experiments – i.e. are the results true to real life (ecological validity)? Also Moscovici used female students as participants (i.e. unrepresentative sample), so it would be wrong to generalise his result to all people – they only tell us about the behaviour of female students.

psychology AS (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions