Social Influence Flashcards
What are the 3 social influences
- Conformity (Sherif and Asch)
- Obedience (Milgram)
- Minority change
Describe Milgram (1963)
- Ordered participants to give electric shocks to other participants when they answered a question incorrectly
- In reality there was no other participant, it was just a recording, nobody was receiving shocks
- Shocks range from 15V to 450V, despite participant believing they were actually shocking someone, 62.5% finished experiment
- When participants were unwilling to continue, experimenter would say ‘You must continue’, most obeyed and did
- Participants heard response from ‘learner’
- E.g. ‘This really hurts’, ‘You can’t hold me here, get me out’, ‘I told you I had heart troubles and it is starting to bother me’
- From 330V onwards heart no response, left teacher to interpret this is their own way
- Milgram sent study to various psychiatrists/psychologists around US and asked them to predict how many participants would continue up to 450V
- Predicted there would be an obedience rate of only 2-5% ; only those with sadistic/psychopathic tendencies would finish
Milgram’s variations
Baseline = 62.5%
Gender = 62.5%
Proximity (same room) = 40%
Touch proximity (forced learner’s hand on plate) = 30%
Proximity of experimenter (give instructions over phone) = 20.5%
Proximity of experimenter (gave instructions by note) = 2.5%
Compliance (disobedient confederates = 10%
Compliance (obedient confederates) = 90%
Location (inner city) = 48%
What are the explanations of Migram
Abnormal participants; all had sadistic tendencies
- Unlikely as participants volunteered and didn’t know what they were doing beforehand
- Study has been replicated many times with same result
People in general are sadistic
- Unlikely as many showed signs of distress
What are the explanations of authority
Agentic state:
- When obeying you see yourself as just carrying out someone else’s wishes which reduces responsibly and guilt
Gradual committment:
- Easier to do something if it starts off small and gradually increases
Legitamate authority figures:
- Conditioned from a young age to obey
Describe Asch (1956)
- Put into groups, given unambiguous task, shown a series of lines and asked to say which lane was longest (told it was a study on sight)
- Each group had only one participant, everyone else was a confederate told to give the same incorrect answer to see if real participant would conform and also answer incorrectly
- Rate of conformity = 33%
- Also tested in individual groups as a control, almost no mistakes were made
What effects conformity?
Group size:
- Conformity increases as group size does
- Only case from 1-3, further increase makes little difference
Social support:
- Conformity decreases if they gain support and are able to go against majority together
Anonymity:
- Rate of conformity reduced to 12.5% if they could write answers instead of speaking outloud
Unanimity:
- Conformity decreases if one group member gives a different answer to group
Describe Sherif’s Autokinetic study (1936)
- Used a well-known physiological phenomenon called the autokinetic effect
- If you are in a pitch black room and only see one pin prick of light you will see the light move, due to your eyes moving
- Asked participants 100 times ‘How much does the light move?’
- Asked on their own, then in groups of 3 and 4
- Individual trials - gave a regular estimate, all different from each other
- Group trials - all estimated same amount
- After the experiment - re-tested at a later date, group judgement still remained; suggests internalised norms
What are the reasons for conformity
Normative
- Asch
- Desire of approval and to fit in
Informational
- Sherif
- Desire to be right
- Not sure of answer ourselves so look elsewhere for help
Describe minority influence
- Works through snowball effect
- Minorities must have strong, clear arguments
- Minorities must stick to their views
- Must overestimate their support in order to gain support (that way majority think they are the minority and switch)
Describe Conversion Theory (Moscovici, 1980)
- Exposure to majority view
- Desire to be liked
- Superficial processing of majority’s portion
- Public acceptance, private rejection
- Manifest public influence
- Exposure to minority view
- Intrigued and have a desire to understand
- Deep processing of minority’s position
- public rejection, private acceptance
- Latent private influence