Social Influence Flashcards
What is conformity?
A change in a persons behaviour or opinions as a result of a real or imagined pressure from a person/group
What is compliance
Going along with others views in public, but in private they arent changed
Superficial change
Temporary
Only when group pressure is present
E.g. Eating with chopsticks at a Chinese even though its tedious, too scared to ask for a fork
What is identification
Conforming to the views of a group because there is something desirable about them
Temporary change
Public change but not private
Only in group pressure
E.g. Buying something because your friend has it and you want them to like you still
What is internalisation
Views change in private and public
More permanent
Opinions internally changed
E.g. Liking a certain band because everyone else does but you realise they are good
Normative social influence
To gain approval or avoid disapproval
Leads to compliance
Informational social influence
Uncertain of what to do in a situation
Look to others for advice
Leads to internalisation
Asch - study of conformity
APFC
A- see if people conform to a group when the answer is clearly wrong
P - thought it was a vision test
One participant, seven confederates
Shown a line, had to say which it was most alike, a/b/c
F - conformed to incorrect answers 32% of the time
75% on at least one critical trial
25% never conformed
Less than 1% incorrect in control group
C - people will conform to the majority, even if the majority is incorrect
Variables affecting conformity - group size
No need for the group to be larger than 3 for conformity to take place
Variables affecting conformity - unanimity
The extent to which all members of the group agree
Majority was unanimous therefore the participants selected the same line
Variables affecting conformity - task difficulty
Harder tasks mean people are most likely to assume that the majority are right
Evaluation of Asch study of conformity
+ conducted in a lab, variables controlled
+ good sample size of 123 participants
- biased sample, all male americans, cant be generalised
- lacks ecological validity, no application to real life as its not meaningful
- participants were deceived, ethical issue
- ‘child of its time’ results may be different if it was done today
Zimbardo - study of conformity to social roles
APFC
A - see if brutality in prisons was to do with personality or identification to the social roles
P - newspaper ad, people applied, paid, two weeks, 24 ‘normal average’ males selected
Randomly assigned roles, prisoner or guard
Mock prison
Prisoners were unexpectedly arrested at their homes
Referred to by number, 3 meals a day, 2 hours reading and 2 visits per week ‘rights’
F - took to their roles ‘too well’
Guards made prisoners do dehumanising tasks, they volunteered to do extra hours without pay
5 prisoners sent home early
Experiment was cut short, only lasted 6 days
C - due to normative social influence and identification
Conditions of the prison are to blame
Evaluation of zimbardo’s prison study
+ lab environment, controlled
+ findings can be applied to real life situations
- biased sample, all white american males
- ethical issues, psychological harm
Milgram - study of obedience
APFC
A - why did germans follow Hitlers orders? Are they more obedient?
P - experiment investigating ‘learning’
40 males between 30 and 50
Range of jobs
Introduced to participant who was a confederate, drew straws to determine role, confederate always learner
Word pairs to remember and recall from a list of 4
Administer electric shock, increases each time, 15v-450v
Wrong answer on purpose, standard instructions and told to continue giving the shocks
F - 65% went all the way to 450v, 100% went to 300v
C - likely to follow orders of an authority figure, even to the extent of killing someone
Evaluation of Milgrims study of obedience
\+ controlled lab environment \+ actor faked screaming to make it more realistic \+ standardised procedure (reliable) \+ can be replicated \+ has been replicated in other cultures
- participants were deceived
- low ecological validity
- not protected from harm (guilt/shame)
- biased sample (all men)
- lack of internal validity, people worked out that it was fake
Variables affecting obedience - proximity
Rate dropped when the experimenter left the room
Also dropped when the person receiving the shocks was in the same room as they could see the pain they were in