Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Attachment

A

An emotional bond/relationship between an infant and their primary caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interactional synchrony

A

Mother and infant reflect the actions/emotions of the other and do it in a co-ordinated way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Asocial attachment

A

Stage 1
Birth-2 months
Similar response to any caregiver
Synchrony/reciprocity to establish relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Indiscriminate attachment

A
Stage 2
2-7 months
Recognise/prefer certain adults
No stranger/separation anxiety
Preference for people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Specific attachment

A

Stage 3
7-9 months
Distress when separated from certain adults
Primary attachment figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Multiple attachments

A

Stage 4
9+ months
Secondary attachments with others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stages of attachment

A
Schafer and emerson study
60 Glasgow infants
External validity
Longitudinal design
Limited sample
Hard to study asocial stage
Conflicting evidence 
Hard to measure multiple attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Longitudinal study

A

Same kids observed over a long period of time, can see how they develop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Role of the father

A
Paternal leave
Cultural factors
Play time
Temperament of child
Not physically adapted
Paternal involvement
Travelling for work
Males have male attachment figures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Imprinting

A

Make and attachment with the first thing seen after birth.

Innate process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lorenz study

A

Goslings
Half with the mother
Half with lorenz
His group followed him around

Cant be generalised to human babies and theyre unable to move and follow attachment figure around
Differences are too vast between humans/birds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Critical period

A

Time after birth when imprinting must take place

Chicks dont attach to a mother figure if imprinting doesnt occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Harlows study

A

Effects of privation
16 monkeys separated from mothers
Access to surrogate mothers, one cloth & one wire
- 8 got milk from cloth
- 8 got milk from wire
Both groups spent more time with the cloth mother and sook comfort
Monkeys with surrogate mothers were more timid, aggressive and had difficulty mating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Harlow -> evaluation

A

Contact comfort is necessary for animals/humans
Monkeys are most alike to humans
Both become distressed when isolated from mother figure
Social workers realise the risks of child neglect
Zoo’s can have better breeding programmes
Ethical issues as monkeys suffered greatly
Permanently scarred and severe emotional damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Classical conditioning - learning theory/ behaviourist approach

A

Unconditioned stimulus (food) -> unconditioned response (happy)

Neutral stimulus (mother) -> no response

Unconditioned + neutral (food + mother) -> unconditioned response (happy)

Conditioned stimulus (mother) -> conditioned response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Operant conditioning

A

Reward and punishment

Child is hungry and makes noise to attract attention
Comfort is provided by the food (reward) - primary reinforcer
Mother gives food so child wants to be with her - secondary reinforcer

17
Q

Bowlbys monotropic theory

A

1) attachments are needed for survival - social releasers
2) biological process - during critical period
3) monotropic - one primary attachment figure
4) internal working model - what to expect from others
5) continuity hypothesis - securely attached cope well with emotional/social situations
6) secure base - safe place to return in danger

18
Q

Evaluation of bowlbys monotropic theory

A

+ securely attached kids are more popular
+ social releasers lead to interactional synchrony
+ in interviews, those with poor attachments to parents had bad attachments in future

  • some children cope better than others and can recover
  • temperament hypothesis, some form relationships better
  • many children form multiple attachments
19
Q

Strange situation

A

1) parent + child in room
2) parent watches child play
3) stranger enters room and parent leaves
4) stranger tries to interact
5) parent enters, stranger leaves, parent leaves
6) child alone
7) stranger comes back in
8) parent + child reunited and stranger leaves

20
Q

Separation anxiety

A

Unease shown by child when left by the caregiver

21
Q

Stranger anxiety

A

Infants response to a stranger

22
Q

Securely attached

A
Type B
66%
Explore room in mothers presence
Upset when mother leaves
Seek comfort when she returns
Treated mother snd stranger different
23
Q

Insecure-avoidant

A
Type A
22%
Ignored the mother
Few signs of stress when she leaves
Ignored/avoided on return
Treat mother and stranger similarly
24
Q

Insecure-resistant

A
Type C
12%
Very distressed when mother was absent
Sought comfort and rejected it
Caregiver was inconsistent: rejecting/angry or overly responsive/sensitive
25
Q

Evaluation of strange situation

A

+ good reliability
+ standardised procedure - has been repeated many times

  • only looks at attachment to mother, others could be different
  • different behaviours on different occasions e.g. If mother becomes ill
  • ethical issues, child is purposely put under stress
  • biased sample, middle class americans
  • low ecological validity, in a lab environment
26
Q

Culture

A

Norms and values that exist within a group of people

27
Q

Individualist culture

A

Value the rights and interests of the individual
People live in small families
Typical of western-culture
More independence

28
Q

Collectivist culture

A

More value on the collective rather than an individual

Interdependence rather than independence

29
Q

Van ijzendoorn & kroonenberg - strange situation across cultures

A

Compare findings across cultures
Secure attachment is always the norm, innate process
There are differences in patterns, could be due to cultural attitudes or parenting styles

30
Q

Evaluation of cross culture strange situation

A

+ meta-analysis is ethically sound, no more traumatic strange situations
+ larger sample increases internal validity
+ applications in psychology, different child rearing practices can impact on the attachment type

  • biased, ethnocentric procedure and based on american norms
  • samples could be unrepresentative of the culture, comparison was between countries not cultures
31
Q

Maternal deprivation - Bowlby

A

Lack of mother figure could lead to affectionless psychopathy
First 2.5 years is critical period
Deprivation occurs when primary attachment figure is gone for an extended period of time

32
Q

44 juvenile thieves - Bowlby

A

1- 44 teenagers, stealing
2- 44 teenagers, emotional problems
Matched for age/IQ

1- 14 were affectionless psychopaths, 12/14 had prolonged separation
5/30 of none affectionless psychopaths experienced separation

2- 2/44 had separations and none were affectionless psychopaths

33
Q

Maternal deprivation evaluation

A
  • poor evidence, war orphans were traumatised and deprived of many aspects of care
    Carried out the assessment knowing what he hoped to find
  • critical period is sensitive period, effects could be reversed
  • could be psychological separation not physical separation
34
Q

Deprivation vs Privation

A

Deprivation - loss of primary attachment figure after attachment has developed

Privation - failure to form attachment in the first place

35
Q

Romanian institutions

A

111 adopted by the age of 2
54 adopted by the age of 4

Interviewed and progress compared with a British control group

  • romanian children behind in all aspects at time of adoption (physical, cognitive and social development), classed as mentally retarded
  • romanian children adopted before the age of 6 months caught up development wise by the age of 4